From Period Finding to Lattice Sampling: Experimental Insights into Shor's and Regev's Factoring Algorithms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17647v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:06:38 GMT
• Title: From Period Finding to Lattice Sampling: Experimental Insights into Shor's and Regev's Factoring Algorithms
• Abstract summary: We present an experimental study of Regev's quantum factoring algorithm, implemented on real quantum hardware, and compare its behavior with that of Shor's algorithm.<n>Our analysis emphasizes the different ways in which Shor's and Regev's algorithms encode arithmetic structure into quantum states.<n>Although neither algorithm demonstrates a practical advantage in the small N regime, the results provide insight into their relative robustness and failure modes on contemporary quantum devices.
• Score: 0.7233065479782753
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantum algorithms for integer factorization represent one of the most prominent applications of quantum computation, with far-reaching implications for modern cryptography. While Shor's algorithm provides a polynomial-time solution in the ideal quantum model, its practical implementation is severely constrained by the limitations of current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. These constraints have motivated the exploration of alternative factoring algorithms with different structural and resource trade-offs. In this work, we present an experimental study of Regev's quantum factoring algorithm, implemented on real quantum hardware, and compare its behavior with that of Shor's algorithm under analogous conditions. Focusing on the case N = 15, we execute both algorithms on the QMIO quantum computer at the Centro de Supercomputacion de Galicia (CESGA) and contrast the results with one of IBM's open-access quantum computers and ideal simulations. This parallel execution enables a low-level comparison of the two algorithms, highlighting how their respective quantum implementations interact with hardware noise, limited circuit depth, and finite sampling. Our analysis emphasizes the different ways in which Shor's and Regev's algorithms encode arithmetic structure into quantum states through Fourier sampling in one and higher dimensions, respectively, and how these differences manifest in experimental outcomes. Although neither algorithm demonstrates a practical advantage in the small N regime, the results provide insight into their relative robustness and failure modes on contemporary quantum devices. This study illustrates the value of experimental benchmarking of alternative quantum factoring algorithms as a means of understanding the practical implications of algorithmic design choices in the NISQ era.

Related papers

• Implementation and Analysis of Regev's Quantum Factorization Algorithm [0.2874893537471256]
  We present our implementation of Regev's algorithm for factoring composite numbers.<n>Despite Regev's theoretical advantage, our implementation exhibited execution times longer than Shor's algorithm for small integer factorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T21:02:15Z)
• Performance Benchmarking of Quantum Algorithms for Hard Combinatorial Optimization Problems: A Comparative Study of non-FTQC Approaches [0.0]
  This study systematically benchmarks several non-fault-tolerant quantum computing algorithms across four distinct optimization problems. Our benchmark includes noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) algorithms, such as the variational quantum eigensolver. Our findings reveal that no single non-FTQC algorithm performs optimally across all problem types, underscoring the need for tailored algorithmic strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T08:41:29Z)
• Efficient Learning for Linear Properties of Bounded-Gate Quantum Circuits [62.46800898243033]
  Recent progress in quantum learning theory prompts a question: can linear properties of a large-qubit circuit be efficiently learned from measurement data generated by varying classical inputs?<n>We prove that the sample complexity scaling linearly in $d$ is required to achieve a small prediction error, while the corresponding computational complexity may scale exponentially in d.<n>We propose a kernel-based method leveraging classical shadows and truncated trigonometric expansions, enabling a controllable trade-off between prediction accuracy and computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T08:21:28Z)
• Benchmarking Variational Quantum Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization in Practice [0.0]
  Variational quantum algorithms and, in particular, variants of the varational quantum eigensolver have been proposed to address optimization (CO) problems. We numerically investigate what this scaling result means in practice for solving CO problems using Max-Cut as a benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T09:57:34Z)
• Quantum Subroutine for Variance Estimation: Algorithmic Design and Applications [80.04533958880862]
  Quantum computing sets the foundation for new ways of designing algorithms. New challenges arise concerning which field quantum speedup can be achieved. Looking for the design of quantum subroutines that are more efficient than their classical counterpart poses solid pillars to new powerful quantum algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T09:32:07Z)
• Quantum Annealing for Single Image Super-Resolution [86.69338893753886]
  We propose a quantum computing-based algorithm to solve the single image super-resolution (SISR) problem. The proposed AQC-based algorithm is demonstrated to achieve improved speed-up over a classical analog while maintaining comparable SISR accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T11:57:15Z)
• Decomposition of Matrix Product States into Shallow Quantum Circuits [62.5210028594015]
  tensor network (TN) algorithms can be mapped to parametrized quantum circuits (PQCs) We propose a new protocol for approximating TN states using realistic quantum circuits. Our results reveal one particular protocol, involving sequential growth and optimization of the quantum circuit, to outperform all other methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-01T17:08:41Z)
• Benchmarking Small-Scale Quantum Devices on Computing Graph Edit Distance [52.77024349608834]
  Graph Edit Distance (GED) measures the degree of (dis)similarity between two graphs in terms of the operations needed to make them identical. In this paper we present a comparative study of two quantum approaches to computing GED.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T12:35:26Z)
• Approximate Equivalence Checking of Noisy Quantum Circuits [8.36229449571485]
  We study the problem of equivalence checking in the NISQ (Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum) computing realm where quantum noise is present inevitably. The notion of approximate equivalence of (possibly noisy) quantum circuits is defined based on the Jamiolkowski fidelity. We present two algorithms, aiming at different situations where the number of noises varies, for computing the fidelity between an ideal quantum circuit and its noisy implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-22T05:47:41Z)
• Resource-efficient encoding algorithm for variational bosonic quantum simulations [0.0]
  In the Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) era of quantum computing, quantum resources are limited. We present a resource-efficient quantum algorithm for bosonic ground and excited state computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T19:00:05Z)
• An Application of Quantum Annealing Computing to Seismic Inversion [55.41644538483948]
  We apply a quantum algorithm to a D-Wave quantum annealer to solve a small scale seismic inversions problem. The accuracy achieved by the quantum computer is at least as good as that of the classical computer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T14:18:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.