Language Models as Interfaces, Not Oracles: A Hybrid LLM-ML System for Pediatric Appendicitis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19183v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 15:22:51 GMT
• Title: Language Models as Interfaces, Not Oracles: A Hybrid LLM-ML System for Pediatric Appendicitis
• Abstract summary: ClaMPAPP (Clinical Language-assisted Machine-learning Pipeline for Appendicitis) is a hybrid system that uses an LLM as an interface rather than as the final decision-maker.<n>We evaluated ClaMPAPP on two independent pediatric appendicitis cohorts from German hospitals.
• Score: 1.0312968200748116
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can make clinical decision support more accessible by interpreting free-text documentation, but their direct use as diagnostic engines is limited by sensitivity to prompts, information order, and plausible but incorrect outputs. Structured machine-learning models offer more stable risk prediction, yet they require tabular inputs that are difficult to integrate with narrative clinical workflows. We present ClaMPAPP (Clinical Language-assisted Machine-learning Pipeline for Appendicitis), a hybrid system that uses an LLM as an interface rather than as the final decision-maker. ClaMPAPP extracts schema-constrained clinical features from note-like narratives, applies deterministic plausibility checks, and passes validated features to an XGBoost classifier trained on clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound variables. We evaluated ClaMPAPP on two independent pediatric appendicitis cohorts from German hospitals and compared it with end-to-end LLM baselines, including open-source and proprietary models. To preserve ground truth while testing free-text input, narratives were generated from structured electronic health records through template rendering and constrained LLM rewriting, with additional sentence-order permutation to assess positional robustness. ClaMPAPP achieved the strongest overall diagnostic performance in both internal and external validation while minimizing missed appendicitis cases, the key safety concern in acute triage. End-to-end LLMs showed unstable sensitivity-specificity trade-offs and greater degradation under narrative reordering. These results support an LLM-as-interface, ML-as-predictor design that separates natural-language usability from predictive inference and provides a more auditable pathway for clinical decision support.

Related papers

• Concept-Grounded Reasoning with Prompt-Driven Localization for Interpretable Structured Report Generation [66.62662330558906]
  CORAL is a multimodal framework that integrates spatial grounding and concept-level supervision into a unified reasoning process.<n>CORAL employs a prompt-driven medical segmentation model to localize lesions and predicts multi-class clinical attributes through a Concept Bottleneck module.<n>Experiments on BUS-CoT and IU X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in diagnostic accuracy, concept consistency, and report quality over strong general-purpose and medical MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T10:21:23Z)
• KREL: Automatic Medical Coding via Knowledge-Guided Reasoning over Clinical Evidence with LLMs [32.666218878368575]
  Automatic Medical Coding (AMC) assigns standardized International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to clinical notes.<n>Key challenges remain, including the extreme length of clinical notes and the vast ICD label space.<n>We propose Knowledge-Guided Reasoning over Clinical Evidence with LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-21T09:05:15Z)
• From Black-Box to Clinical Insight: A Multi-Stage Explainable Framework for Speech-Based Cognitive Impairment Detection [1.8161595018361627]
  We propose a multi-stage explainability framework that translates black-box transformer predictions into clinically grounded narratives.<n>The framework maps model outputs to four cognitive-linguistic dimensions, including lexical richness, syntactic complexity, and semantic coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-26T11:21:42Z)
• Statistics, Not Scale: Modular Medical Dialogue with Bayesian Belief Engine [51.722324399751294]
  Large language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous diagnostic agents, yet they conflate two fundamentally different capabilities.<n>We introduce BMBE, a modular diagnostic dialogue framework that enforces a strict separation between language and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T21:59:57Z)
• LLMs for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction from Structured Clinical Data [0.0]
  Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains one of the leading causes of death globally.<n>We develop a hybrid framework that bridges structured clinical data and natural-language representations for CAD prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T00:16:05Z)
• A Federated and Parameter-Efficient Framework for Large Language Model Training in Medicine [59.78991974851707]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on medical benchmarks, including question answering and diagnosis.<n>Most medical LLMs are trained on data from a single institution, which faces limitations in generalizability and safety in heterogeneous systems.<n>We introduce the model-agnostic and parameter-efficient federated learning framework for adapting LLMs to medical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T18:48:21Z)
• Visualizing token importance for black-box language models [48.747801442240565]
  We consider the problem of auditing black-box large language models (LLMs) to ensure they behave reliably when deployed in production settings.<n>We propose Distribution-Based Sensitivity Analysis (DBSA) to evaluate the sensitivity of the output of a language model for each input token.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T14:01:43Z)
• Toward Reliable Clinical Coding with Language Models: Verification and Lightweight Adaptation [3.952186976672079]
  We show that lightweight interventions, including prompt engineering and small-scale fine-tuning, can improve accuracy without the computational overhead of search-based methods.<n>To address hierarchically near-miss errors, we introduce clinical code verification as both a standalone task and a pipeline component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T23:50:58Z)
• Exploring LLM-based Frameworks for Fault Diagnosis [2.2562573557834686]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based systems present new opportunities for autonomous health monitoring in sensor-rich industrial environments.<n>This study explores the potential of LLMs to detect and classify faults directly from sensor data, while producing inherently explainable outputs through natural language reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T04:53:15Z)
• Applications of Small Language Models in Medical Imaging Classification with a Focus on Prompt Strategies [9.1953139634128]
  This study investigates the performance of small language models (SLMs) in a medical imaging classification task.<n>Using the NIH Chest X-ray dataset, we evaluate multiple SLMs on the task of classifying chest X-ray positions.<n>Our results show that certain SLMs achieve competitive accuracy with well-crafted prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T21:48:45Z)
• Interpretable Medical Diagnostics with Structured Data Extraction by Large Language Models [59.89454513692417]
  Tabular data is often hidden in text, particularly in medical diagnostic reports. We propose a novel, simple, and effective methodology for extracting structured tabular data from textual medical reports, called TEMED-LLM. We demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art text classification models in medical diagnostics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T09:12:28Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)
• VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features, Explanations, and Data for Healthcare Models [85.4333256782337]
  VBridge is a visual analytics tool that seamlessly incorporates machine learning explanations into clinicians' decision-making workflow. We identified three key challenges, including clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML features, lack of contextual information, and the need for cohort-level evidence. We demonstrated the effectiveness of VBridge through two case studies and expert interviews with four clinicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T17:34:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.