Efficient Neural Network Model Selection for Few-Class Application Datasets
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19712v1
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 02:22:27 GMT
- Title: Efficient Neural Network Model Selection for Few-Class Application Datasets
- Abstract summary: We develop a measure of classification difficulty based on data-side properties and show how it enables more efficient model selection for few-class datasets.<n>Our metric allows comparison of models and datasets 6 to 29$times$ faster than repeated training and testing.<n>We demonstrate few-class model selection across mobile robot, drone, and IoT scenarios.
- Score: 8.91759891163444
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: While much effort has focused on developing and benchmarking high-performance neural networks, less attention has been given to how dataset properties, known to practitioners, can guide efficient model selection. Neural models are typically evaluated on datasets with thousands of classes, yet many real-world applications involve fewer than ten. To address this understudied but common setting, we develop a measure of classification difficulty based on data-side properties and show how it enables more efficient model selection for few-class datasets, where traditional approaches are less effective. We term this phenomenon "few-class distinctiveness". Our metric allows comparison of models and datasets 6 to 29$\times$ faster than repeated training and testing. Leveraging this insight, we extend scaled model families below the smallest published models, achieving greater efficiency at similar accuracy, for example models up to 42% smaller than YOLOv5-nano for a mobile robot task. Targeting resource-constrained applications, we demonstrate few-class model selection across mobile robot, drone, and IoT scenarios, highlighting practical gains in efficiency without sacrificing performance.
Related papers
- Neural Coherence : Find higher performance to out-of-distribution tasks from few samples [22.92306176087978]
This work proposes a novel approach for model selection that operates reliably on just a few unlabeled examples from the target task.<n>We provide experiments where models are pre-trained on ImageNet1K and examine target domains consisting of Food-101, PlantNet-300K and iNaturalist.<n>Our approach significantly improves generalization across these different target domains compared to established baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-05T16:55:41Z) - Enabling Small Models for Zero-Shot Selection and Reuse through Model Label Learning [50.68074833512999]
We introduce a novel paradigm, Model Label Learning (MLL), which bridges the gap between models and their functionalities.<n>Experiments on seven real-world datasets validate the effectiveness and efficiency of MLL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-21T09:08:26Z) - A Lightweight Measure of Classification Difficulty from Application Dataset Characteristics [4.220363193932374]
We propose an efficient cosine similarity-based classification difficulty measure S.
It is calculated from the number of classes and intra- and inter-class similarity metrics of the dataset.
We show how a practitioner can use this measure to help select an efficient model 6 to 29x faster than through repeated training and testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-09T03:27:09Z) - A Two-Phase Recall-and-Select Framework for Fast Model Selection [13.385915962994806]
We propose a two-phase (coarse-recall and fine-selection) model selection framework.
It aims to enhance the efficiency of selecting a robust model by leveraging the models' training performances on benchmark datasets.
It has been demonstrated that the proposed methodology facilitates the selection of a high-performing model at a rate about 3x times faster than conventional baseline methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T14:44:44Z) - Diffusion-Based Neural Network Weights Generation [80.89706112736353]
D2NWG is a diffusion-based neural network weights generation technique that efficiently produces high-performing weights for transfer learning.
Our method extends generative hyper-representation learning to recast the latent diffusion paradigm for neural network weights generation.
Our approach is scalable to large architectures such as large language models (LLMs), overcoming the limitations of current parameter generation techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T08:34:23Z) - A Simple and Efficient Baseline for Data Attribution on Images [107.12337511216228]
Current state-of-the-art approaches require a large ensemble of as many as 300,000 models to accurately attribute model predictions.
In this work, we focus on a minimalist baseline, utilizing the feature space of a backbone pretrained via self-supervised learning to perform data attribution.
Our method is model-agnostic and scales easily to large datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T17:29:46Z) - Efficiently Robustify Pre-trained Models [18.392732966487582]
robustness of large scale models towards real-world settings is still a less-explored topic.
We first benchmark the performance of these models under different perturbations and datasets.
We then discuss on how complete model fine-tuning based existing robustification schemes might not be a scalable option given very large scale networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-14T08:07:49Z) - TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scale [79.56020040993947]
We present TRAK (Tracing with Randomly-trained After Kernel), a data attribution method that is both effective and computationally tractable for large-scale, differenti models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-24T17:56:22Z) - Are Sample-Efficient NLP Models More Robust? [90.54786862811183]
We investigate the relationship between sample efficiency (amount of data needed to reach a given ID accuracy) and robustness (how models fare on OOD evaluation)
We find that higher sample efficiency is only correlated with better average OOD robustness on some modeling interventions and tasks, but not others.
These results suggest that general-purpose methods for improving sample efficiency are unlikely to yield universal OOD robustness improvements, since such improvements are highly dataset- and task-dependent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-12T17:54:59Z) - Practical Active Learning with Model Selection for Small Data [13.128648437690224]
We develop a simple and fast method for practical active learning with model selection.
Our method is based on an underlying pool-based active learner for binary classification using support vector classification with a radial basis function kernel.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-21T23:11:27Z) - STAR: Sparse Transformer-based Action Recognition [61.490243467748314]
This work proposes a novel skeleton-based human action recognition model with sparse attention on the spatial dimension and segmented linear attention on the temporal dimension of data.
Experiments show that our model can achieve comparable performance while utilizing much less trainable parameters and achieve high speed in training and inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-15T02:53:11Z) - ALT-MAS: A Data-Efficient Framework for Active Testing of Machine
Learning Algorithms [58.684954492439424]
We propose a novel framework to efficiently test a machine learning model using only a small amount of labeled test data.
The idea is to estimate the metrics of interest for a model-under-test using Bayesian neural network (BNN)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-11T12:14:04Z) - It's the Best Only When It Fits You Most: Finding Related Models for
Serving Based on Dynamic Locality Sensitive Hashing [1.581913948762905]
Preparation of training data is often a bottleneck in the lifecycle of deploying a deep learning model for production or research.
This paper proposes an end-to-end process of searching related models for serving based on the similarity of the target dataset and the training datasets of the available models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-13T22:52:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.