Bridging Technical AI, Societal Impacts, and Workforce Competencies in AI Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20994v1
• Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:18 GMT
• Title: Bridging Technical AI, Societal Impacts, and Workforce Competencies in AI Education
• Abstract summary: AI education often remains fragmented, with technical concepts, ethics, human-centered design, and workforce preparation taught separately.<n>This work-in-progress presents a curriculum mapping framework that links technical systems, societal harms, and workforce competencies.
• Score: 2.0901018134712297
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As AI becomes embedded across everyday life and work, educators must help students connect technical knowledge with societal consequences and workplace responsibilities. Yet AI education often remains fragmented, with technical concepts, ethics, human-centered design, and workforce preparation taught separately. This work-in-progress presents a curriculum mapping framework that links technical systems, societal harms, and workforce competencies, beginning with institutional courses and expanding through an external 335-course registry. Early findings from six courses suggest that technical coverage is often strong, societal harms are present but unevenly integrated, and workforce competencies are rarely explicitly assessed. These findings speak to AI literacy efforts by showing that literacy cannot stop at awareness of AI concepts or harms; it must also include competencies for responsible action in AI-enabled contexts.

Related papers

• AI Literacy: An Exercise in Power-Knowledge [0.42970700836450487]
  This paper argues that the existing frameworks for AI literacy are insufficient because they enforce a "consumer" orientation toward AI.<n>It proposes a reconceptualization of AI literacy as a critical practice that equips individuals not just to use AI systems, but to critically evaluate them, resist their structuring assumptions, and participate in their governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-30T00:39:46Z)
• Reshaping Undergraduate Computer Science Education in the Generative AI Era [85.78707817763434]
  Generative AI represents a turning point for Computer Science (CS) education.<n>To keep pace with advances in AI technology, CS curricula should consider a shift toward understanding and verifying AI-generated artifacts.<n>We believe that to effectively prepare future computer science graduates, capable of creating, solving problems, and managing, as well as co-creating, artifacts with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T05:26:24Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Lifelong Learning: Opportunities and Challenges in Adult Education Policy [0.0]
  This paper examines the role of AI in adult education policy, with a focus on both its opportunities and its challenges.<n>It discusses how AI can support personalized learning, intelligent tutoring, learning analytics, and workforce development.<n>At the same time, the paper highlights significant concerns related to the digital divide, data privacy, algorithmic bias, over-reliance on technology, and the readiness of educators and institutions to integrate AI effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T12:59:22Z)
• Learning AI Without a STEM Background: Mixed-Methods Evidence from a Diverse, Mixed-Cohort AIED Program [0.0]
  This paper presents and evaluates an NSF-funded, innovative mixed-cohort AI education model.<n>We examine learners' academic agency, confidence navigating AI concepts, and perceived expansion of career trajectories.<n>Our findings suggest that human-centered instructional supports, such as ethical scaffolding, mentorship, and structured discussion, are essential components of equitable AI education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-27T01:29:36Z)
• The AI Pyramid A Conceptual Framework for Workforce Capability in the Age of AI [2.134211474877041]
  Recent evidence shows that generative AI disproportionately affects highly educated, white collar work.<n>This paper proposes the AI Pyramid, a conceptual framework for organizing human capability in an AI mediated economy.<n>The framework has implications for organizations, education systems, and governments seeking to align learning, measurement, and policy with the evolving demands of AI mediated work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T09:27:56Z)
• Comprehensive AI Literacy: The Case for Centering Human Agency [0.0]
  We are witnessing the rise of a dangerous gap, where a focus on the functional, operational skills of using AI tools is eclipsing the development of critical and ethical reasoning about them.<n>This position paper argues for a systemic shift toward comprehensive AI literacy that centers human agency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T15:25:38Z)
• Deploying AI for Signal Processing education: Selected challenges and intriguing opportunities [44.18936398140735]
  Article explores the use of AI tools to facilitate and enhance education.<n> Primers are provided on several core technical issues that arise when using AI in educational settings.<n>The article serves as a resource for researchers and educators seeking to advance AI's role in engineering education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T19:19:26Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies [48.90506360377104]
  This paper introduces a competency-based model for generative artificial intelligence (AI) literacy covering essential skills and knowledge areas necessary to interact with generative AI.<n>The competencies range from foundational AI literacy to prompt engineering and programming skills, including ethical and legal considerations.<n>These twelve competencies offer a framework for individuals, policymakers, government officials, and educators looking to navigate and take advantage of the potential of generative AI responsibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T14:55:15Z)
• AI Literacy for All: Adjustable Interdisciplinary Socio-technical Curriculum [0.8879149917735942]
  This paper presents a curriculum, "AI Literacy for All," to promote an interdisciplinary understanding of AI. The paper presents four pillars of AI literacy: understanding the scope and technical dimensions of AI, learning how to interact with Gen-AI in an informed and responsible way, the socio-technical issues of ethical and responsible AI, and the social and future implications of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T13:13:53Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.