Causal Gaussian Processes for Robust Treatment Effect Evaluation with Unobserved Confounding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21809v1
• Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:05:25 GMT
• Title: Causal Gaussian Processes for Robust Treatment Effect Evaluation with Unobserved Confounding
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates causal effect evaluation over the continuous domain from confounded observations.<n>We develop a novel family of Causal Gaussian process (CGP) models that effectively approximate the observational and interventional distributions of any causal model with confounded observations.
• Score: 65.76392290956525
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The presence of confounding bias poses a key challenge in policy evaluation, as the target causal effects of actions are not identifiable (i.e., underdetermined) from observational data. On the other hand, existing confounding-robust evaluation strategies require detailed prior knowledge about the environment or apply only to discrete treatments and outcomes. This paper investigates causal effect evaluation over the continuous domain from confounded observations, while requiring only basic temporal ordering between the treatment and the outcome. We introduce a universal discretization of the exogenous domains that approximates the observational and interventional distributions of any causal model with arbitrary accuracy using a finite number of latent states. Building on this newfound universal approximation property, we develop a novel family of Causal Gaussian process (CGP) models that effectively approximate the observational and interventional distributions of any causal model with confounded observations.

Related papers

• Predictive Causal Inference via Spatio-Temporal Modeling and Penalized Empirical Likelihood [0.0]
  This study introduces an integrated framework for predictive causal inference designed to overcome limitations in conventional single model approaches.<n> Specifically, we combine a Hidden Markov Model for spatial health state estimation with a Multi Task and Multi Graph Convolutional Network (MTGCN) for capturing temporal outcome trajectories.<n>To demonstrate its utility, we focus on clinical domains such as cancer, dementia, Parkinson disease, where treatment effects are challenging to observe directly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T03:11:15Z)
• Falsification of Unconfoundedness by Testing Independence of Causal Mechanisms [0.6906005491572399]
  We propose an algorithm that can falsify the assumption of no unmeasured confounding in a setting with observational data.<n>Our proposed falsification strategy leverages a key observation that unmeasured confounding can cause observed causal mechanisms to appear dependent.<n>We show that our method is able to efficiently detect confounding on both simulated and semi-synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T08:05:44Z)
• Bayesian Causal Inference with Gaussian Process Networks [1.7188280334580197]
  We consider the problem of the Bayesian estimation of the effects of hypothetical interventions in the Gaussian Process Network model. We detail how to perform causal inference on GPNs by simulating the effect of an intervention across the whole network and propagating the effect of the intervention on downstream variables. We extend both frameworks beyond the case of a known causal graph, incorporating uncertainty about the causal structure via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T14:39:59Z)
• Benchmarking Bayesian Causal Discovery Methods for Downstream Treatment Effect Estimation [137.3520153445413]
  A notable gap exists in the evaluation of causal discovery methods, where insufficient emphasis is placed on downstream inference. We evaluate seven established baseline causal discovery methods including a newly proposed method based on GFlowNets. The results of our study demonstrate that some of the algorithms studied are able to effectively capture a wide range of useful and diverse ATE modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T02:58:10Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Identification and multiply robust estimation in causal mediation analysis across principal strata [7.801213477601286]
  We consider assessing causal mediation in the presence of a post-treatment event. We derive the efficient influence function for each mediation estimand, which motivates a set of multiply robust estimators for inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T00:39:20Z)
• CausalBench: A Large-scale Benchmark for Network Inference from Single-cell Perturbation Data [61.088705993848606]
  We introduce CausalBench, a benchmark suite for evaluating causal inference methods on real-world interventional data. CaulBench incorporates biologically-motivated performance metrics, including new distribution-based interventional metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T13:04:07Z)
• Distributionally Robust Causal Inference with Observational Data [4.8986598953553555]
  We consider the estimation of average treatment effects in observational studies without the standard assumption of unconfoundedness. We propose a new framework of robust causal inference under the general observational study setting with the possible existence of unobserved confounders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T16:02:33Z)
• The interventional Bayesian Gaussian equivalent score for Bayesian causal inference with unknown soft interventions [0.0]
  In certain settings, such as genomics, we may have data from heterogeneous study conditions, with soft (partial) interventions only pertaining to a subset of the study variables. We define the interventional BGe score for a mixture of observational and interventional data, where the targets and effects of intervention may be unknown.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T12:32:08Z)
• Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Training Deep Networks [83.44219640437657]
  Deep learning models are prone to learning spurious correlations that should not be learned as predictive clues. We propose a causality-based training framework to reduce the spurious correlations caused by observable confounders. We conduct experiments on two real-world tasks: Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Image Captioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T17:47:16Z)
• Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
  Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects. We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders. We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.