Learning to Reason with Curriculum II: Compositional Generalization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27721v1
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 05:09:08 GMT
- Title: Learning to Reason with Curriculum II: Compositional Generalization
- Abstract summary: We show that an autocurriculum-based approach building on Part I of this series achieves better statistical complexity than direct methods.<n>For a setting inspired by supervised fine-tuning (SFT), curriculum facilitates learning from only $2mathcalO(sqrtlog T)$ tokens of supervision.<n>For a setting inspired by reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), we show that curriculum reduces the requirement on the reference model from coverage at the full sequence length $T$ to coverage at a shorter block length $B ll T$.
- Score: 27.242998212645784
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Compositional generalization, the ability to solve complex problems by combining solutions to simpler sub-problems, is a fundamental capability of both natural and artificial intelligence, and a key mechanism underlying chain-of-thought reasoning. However, the theoretical underpinnings of compositional generalization remain poorly understood: when and why does decomposing a problem into parts yield more efficient learning than solving it directly? We study this question through the canonical problem of learning to simulate semiautomata (predicting the outcome of $T$ steps of sequential computation), a model that captures state tracking, regular language recognition, and modular arithmetic. We show that an autocurriculum-based approach building on Part I of this series, recursively decomposing longer sequences into shorter sub-problems, learning to solve them, and composing the solutions, achieves dramatically better statistical complexity than direct methods. (i) For a setting inspired by supervised fine-tuning (SFT) where the learner receives interactive feedback on intermediate states of the computation, curriculum facilitates learning from only $2^{\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\log T})}$ tokens of supervision; i.e., subpolynomial in the sequence length $T$, overcoming the $Ω(T)$ token barrier required by direct simulation. (ii) For a setting inspired by reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), where the learner improves a pre-trained reference model using an outcome verifier, we show that curriculum reduces the requirement on the reference model from coverage at the full sequence length $T$ to coverage at a shorter block length $B \ll T$, an exponentially weaker condition.
Related papers
- Provable Benefit of Curriculum in Transformer Tree-Reasoning Post-Training [76.12556589212666]
We show that curriculum post-training avoids the exponential complexity bottleneck.<n>Under outcome-only reward signals, reinforcement learning finetuning achieves high accuracy with sample complexity.<n>We establish guarantees for test-time scaling, where curriculum-aware querying reduces both reward oracle calls and sampling cost from exponential to order.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-10T18:29:54Z) - Code-driven Number Sequence Calculation: Enhancing the inductive Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models [44.17697803306198]
We introduce textitCodeSeq, a synthetic post-training dataset built from number sequences.<n>Our pipeline generates supervised fine data by reflecting on failed test cases and incorporating iterative corrections.<n> Experimental results show that the models trained with textitCodeSeq improve on various reasoning tasks and can preserve the models' OOD performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T12:29:40Z) - Why Can't Transformers Learn Multiplication? Reverse-Engineering Reveals Long-Range Dependency Pitfalls [54.57326125204404]
Language models are increasingly capable, yet still fail at a seemingly simple task of multi-digit multiplication.<n>We study why, by reverse-engineering a model that successfully learns multiplication via emphimplicit chain-of-thought'
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T19:03:26Z) - RL for Reasoning by Adaptively Revealing Rationales [36.50924054394857]
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) relies on dense ground-truth labels, which become increasingly costly as sequence length grows.<n>We address this by adaptive backtracking (AdaBack), a per-sample curriculum learning algorithm that reveals only a partial prefix of the target output during training.<n>We show that our adaptive curriculum over partial answers reliably solves problems that are otherwise intractable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-22T17:46:14Z) - Outcome-Based Online Reinforcement Learning: Algorithms and Fundamental Limits [58.63897489864948]
Reinforcement learning with outcome-based feedback faces a fundamental challenge.<n>How do we assign credit to the right actions?<n>This paper provides the first comprehensive analysis of this problem in online RL with general function approximation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T17:44:08Z) - Syzygy of Thoughts: Improving LLM CoT with the Minimal Free Resolution [59.39066657300045]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting enhances the reasoning of large language models (LLMs) by decomposing problems into sequential steps.<n>We propose Syzygy of Thoughts (SoT)-a novel framework that extends CoT by introducing auxiliary, interrelated reasoning paths.<n>SoT captures deeper logical dependencies, enabling more robust and structured problem-solving.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-13T13:35:41Z) - Fast Controlled Generation from Language Models with Adaptive Weighted Rejection Sampling [90.86991492288487]
evaluating constraint on every token can be prohibitively expensive.<n> LCD can distort the global distribution over strings, sampling tokens based only on local information.<n>We show that our approach is superior to state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T18:30:18Z) - Learning Zero-Sum Linear Quadratic Games with Improved Sample Complexity and Last-Iterate Convergence [18.1055795175092]
Zero-sum Linear Quadratic (LQ) games are fundamental in optimal control.<n>In this work, we propose a simpler nested Zeroth-Order (NPG) algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-08T11:47:31Z) - Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum [25.7378861650474]
This paper considers the learning of logical (Boolean) functions with a focus on the generalization on the unseen (GOTU) setting.
We study how different network architectures trained by (S)GD perform under GOTU.
More specifically, this means an interpolator of the training data that has minimal Fourier mass on the higher degree basis elements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-30T17:44:05Z) - On Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learning: Optimism in the
Face of Large State Spaces [208.67848059021915]
We study the exploration-exploitation tradeoff at the core of reinforcement learning.
In particular, we prove that the complexity of the function class $mathcalF$ characterizes the complexity of the function.
Our regret bounds are independent of the number of episodes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-09T18:32:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.