PerceptionRubrics: Calibrating Multimodal Evaluation to Human Perception

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28322v2
• Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:30:17 GMT
• Title: PerceptionRubrics: Calibrating Multimodal Evaluation to Human Perception
• Abstract summary: PerceptionRubrics is a rubric-based evaluation framework.<n>It addresses the gap between saturated benchmark scores and real-world brittleness.<n>It pairs 1,038 information-dense images with over 10,000 instance-specific rubrics.
• Score: 75.70273182182397
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We introduce PerceptionRubrics, a rubric-based evaluation framework that addresses the gap between saturated benchmark scores and real-world brittleness. Shifting evaluation from holistic semantic matching to rigorous atomic auditing, PerceptionRubrics pairs 1,038 information-dense images with over 10,000 instance-specific rubrics. These criteria are derived from golden captions constructed via a novel Circular Peer-Review consensus pipeline and then distilled into a dual-stream system of Must-Right (essential facts) and Easy-Wrong (fine-grained details) rubrics. Crucially, PerceptionRubrics implements a Gated Scoring mechanism: unlike linear averages, failure on mandatory visual facts triggers sharp binary penalties. Extensive evaluation yields critical insights: (1) The Reliability Gap: models often verify fragmented elements correctly yet fail strict conjunctive constraints, exposing brittleness in dense domains; (2) Open-Closed Stratification: contrary to reasoning trends, we reveal a persistent 8% perception deficit between open-source and proprietary frontiers; and (3) Human-Aligned Rigor: our gated metrics substantially out-align conventional benchmarks, validating that strict perceptual fidelity is the prerequisite for reliable generation.

Related papers

• Ring-Zero: Scaling Zero RL to a Trillion Parameters for Emergent Reasoning [55.99621402404222]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards without human-annotated data, often referred to as zero RL, has emerged as a powerful paradigm for eliciting chain-of-thought reasoning.<n>We aim to elicit high-quality reasoning behaviors from the model.<n>We find that naive scaling often suffers from poor readability, token redundancy, and a lack of adaptive reasoning depth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T06:14:55Z)
• Dual-Branch Cross-Projection Debiasing through Diffusion-based Disentanglement [66.67463557274358]
  Foundation models trained on biased datasets often rely on spurious correlations between target labels and non-causal attributes.<n>We introduce Confidence-guided Concept Mining (CBCM) to identify reliable spurious attributes without attribute annotations.<n>We propose Dual-branch Cross-projection Debiasing (DCD), a prompt-tuning framework that separates target and spurious representations into two branches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T05:28:47Z)
• Rethinking Reward Supervision: Rubric-Conditioned Self-Distillation [60.55792673956761]
  We propose textbfRubric-Conditioned Self-Distillation, a framework that incorporates rubrics as structured, fine-grained feedback for on-policy self-distillation.<n>We evaluate on a diverse suite of science reasoning benchmarks and results show that rubric-conditioned self-distillation effectively converts rubric-level criteria into token-level guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T17:54:04Z)
• The Evaluation Game: Beyond Static LLM Benchmarking [2.168753020470345]
  We introduce a game-theoretic framework in which the interaction between an evaluator and a trainer is formalized as a two-player game.<n>We provide empirical evidence supporting locality-dependence of the model.<n>Our framework recasts the central object of adversarial evaluation: a benchmark is not a static set of prompts but an orbit under the evaluator's group action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T05:22:21Z)
• Architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header and its application to resolve semantically proximal classification errors with vision transformers [0.0]
  This work presents an architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header that can be integrated into feature extractors such as vision transformers.<n>We also propose a novel metric to capture uncertainty and confidence across misclassification rates, as well as an adaptive arithmetic-mean fusion scheme.<n>Although computational costs increase due to Monte Carlo sampling, the method offers plug-and-play compatibility with pre-trained backbones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T09:18:06Z)
• K$α$LOS finds Consensus: A Meta-Algorithm for Evaluating Inter-Annotator Agreement in Complex Vision Tasks [4.297070083645049]
  We propose K$$LOS, a unified meta-algorithm that generalizes the "Localization First" principle to dataset quality evaluation.<n>By resolving spatial correspondence before assessing agreement, our framework transforms complex-categorical problems into nominal reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-28T08:54:05Z)
• CDRRM: Contrast-Driven Rubric Generation for Reliable and Interpretable Reward Modeling [61.75914342638658]
  CDRRM (Contrast-Driven Reward Model) is a framework for high-quality rubric generation and guided preference judgment.<n>This work offers a scalable, interpretable, and data-efficient path for reward modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T07:15:23Z)
• TrustJudge: Inconsistencies of LLM-as-a-Judge and How to Alleviate Them [58.04324690859212]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) as automated evaluators (LLM-as-a-judge) has revealed critical inconsistencies in current evaluation frameworks.<n>We identify two fundamental types of inconsistencies: Score-Comparison Inconsistency and Pairwise Transitivity Inconsistency.<n>We propose TrustJudge, a probabilistic framework that addresses these limitations through two key innovations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T13:04:29Z)
• Rethinking Semi-supervised Segmentation Beyond Accuracy: Reliability and Robustness [10.220692937750295]
  Reliable Score ( RSS) is a novel metric that combines predictive accuracy, calibration, and uncertainty quality measures via a harmonic mean.<n>We advocate for a shift in evaluation protocols toward more holistic metrics like RSS to better align semi-supervised learning research with real-world deployment needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T09:37:45Z)
• TrustLoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation for Failure Detection under Out-of-distribution Data [62.22804234013273]
  We propose a simple failure detection framework to unify and facilitate classification with rejection under both covariate and semantic shifts.<n>Our key insight is that by separating and consolidating failure-specific reliability knowledge with low-rank adapters, we can enhance the failure detection ability effectively and flexibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T09:20:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.