Practitioners At The Limit: Bereavement, Mockery and Ideology in Response to Crisis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30667v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 15:11:37 GMT
• Title: Practitioners At The Limit: Bereavement, Mockery and Ideology in Response to Crisis
• Abstract summary: After decades in which the software industry heroized its technical employees, our current moment finds those employees in crisis.<n>Economically, they are squeezed by a job market that has turned on them since Elon Musk gutted Twitter in 2022.<n>Politically, their craft is continually pressed into the service of an ever tighter alliance between Big Tech and authoritarianism.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: After decades in which the software industry heroized its technical employees, our current moment finds those employees in crisis. Economically, they are squeezed by a job market that has turned on them since Elon Musk gutted Twitter in 2022. Politically, their craft is continually pressed into the service of an ever tighter alliance between Big Tech and authoritarianism. Professionally, they find themselves less and less able to contribute anything good to anyone within business models that are running out of room to pretend they do anything but extract. Technically, they are confronted with a much-hyped technology, generative AI, that distorts their work while purporting to make them redundant. And emotionally, they are simply not ok - as designer and developer Andrew Sempere puts it, "I think the word I'm looking for is: bereft." This study draws from a series of practitioner interviews undertaken for a current dissertation in STS and from ongoing content analysis of practitioners' public statements on blogs, microblogs, podcasts and videos to argue that much of the workforce of technocapitalism is actively unaligning itself from that system's priorities and seeking new ones. Countercultural responses among practitioners are proliferating, including mockery of technocapitalists and technocapitalism, rehabilitation of Luddism, interest in organized labour, and endorsement of alternate systems including anarchism and communism. Whether software practitioners will form an organized enough response to decisively influence the crises that beset them (and, often through their products, the wider world) remains to be seen. But heightened critical attention should be paid to this centrally-located population of technosocial actors in their new and volatile state.

Related papers

• Peaceful Anarcho-Accelerationism: Decentralized Full Automation for a Society of Universal Care [1.5736899098702974]
  This paper introduces peaceful anarcho-accelism, a sociotechnical framework grounded in the 200-year anarchist tradition.<n>We state five formal hypotheses and six research objectives, present a formal definition through analytical categories of interdependent spheres.<n>A nonviolent social mobilization strategy maps concrete peaceful methods to each stage of transition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T18:07:57Z)
• Information Access of the Oppressed: A Problem-Posing Framework for Envisioning Emancipatory Information Access Platforms [5.801539233803859]
  Online information access platforms are targets of authoritarian capture.<n>We explore this question through the lens of Paulo Freire's theories of emancipatory pedagogy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T16:15:26Z)
• $100,000 or the Robot Gets it! Tech Workers' Resistance Guide: Tech Worker Actions, History, Risks, Impacts, and the Case for a Radical Flank [2.100497888256766]
  Big Tech has faced increasing levels of worker activism over the past decade.<n>While worker actions have resulted in positive outcomes, such successes have become increasingly infrequent.<n>This is in part because corporations have adjusted their strategies to dealing with increased worker activism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T15:29:34Z)
• A roadmap for AI in robotics [55.87087746398059]
  We are witnessing growing excitement in robotics at the prospect of leveraging the potential of AI to tackle some of the outstanding barriers to the full deployment of robots in our daily lives.<n>This article offers an assessment of what AI for robotics has achieved since the 1990s and proposes a short- and medium-term research roadmap listing challenges and promises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T15:18:28Z)
• Multi Layered Autonomy and AI Ecologies in Robotic Art Installations [42.16631998429073]
  This paper presents Symbiosis of Agents, a large-scale installation by Baoyang Chen.<n>It embeds AI-driven robots in an immersive, mirror-lined arena, probing the tension between machine agency and artistic authorship.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T08:28:19Z)
• Shaping AI's Impact on Billions of Lives [27.78474296888659]
  We argue for the community of AI practitioners to consciously and proactively work for the common good.<n>This paper offers a blueprint for a new type of innovation infrastructure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T16:29:37Z)
• Near to Mid-term Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI [94.06233419171016]
  Applications of Generative AI are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for these seismic changes has triggered a lively debate about potential risks and resulted in calls for tighter regulation. This regulation is likely to put at risk the budding field of open-source Generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T21:14:24Z)
• Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
  Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution. Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts. We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z)
• Exploiting the Margin: How Capitalism Fuels AI at the Expense of Minoritized Groups [0.0]
  This paper explores the relationship between capitalism, racial injustice, and artificial intelligence (AI) It argues that AI acts as a contemporary vehicle for age-old forms of exploitation. The paper promotes an approach that integrates social justice and equity into the core of technological design and policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T22:40:07Z)
• Unlikely Organizers: The Rise of Labor Activism Among Professionals in the U.S. Technology Industry [0.0]
  Since 2017, we have seen a significant rise in labor actions among tech workers. We show periods of intense workplace social activism preceded later periods of heightened labor activism. This finding extends Fantasia's cultures of solidarity argument to professional workers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T20:04:17Z)
• Personal autonomy and surveillance capitalism: possible future developments [0.0]
  I focus on the threat imposed on the autonomy of human beings in the context of surveillance capitalism. I provide an analysis of the reasons why this threat exists and what consequences we could face if we take no action against such practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T15:27:14Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
  Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI. Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.