Evaluating Vision-Language Models as a Zero-Shot Learning Alternative to You Only Look Once and Optical Character Recognition for Nigerian License Plate Recognition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02025v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 10:55:24 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Vision-Language Models as a Zero-Shot Learning Alternative to You Only Look Once and Optical Character Recognition for Nigerian License Plate Recognition
• Abstract summary: This study explores the potential of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) as a unified, zeroshot learning solution for Nigerian license plate recognition.<n>We evaluate five selected VLMs: Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp (Google DeepMind), Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct (Alibaba), GPT-4o (OpenAI), Claude 4 Sonnet (Anthropic) and Llama 3.2 Vision 90b (Meta)<n>Results based on Character Error Rate (CER) reveal that Gemini and Qwen significantly outperform other models in both accuracy and robustness, on the challenging image scenarios.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: License Plate Recognition (LPR) systems are critical tools in traffic monitoring, security enforcement, and urban mobility management. Traditional LPR systems often rely on a multi-stage pipeline involving object detection using You Only Look Once (YOLO) and Optical Character Recognition (OCR), which suffer from limitations such as high resource demands, poor performance in unstructured environments, and the need for large annotated datasets. This study explores the potential of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) as a unified, zeroshot learning solution for Nigerian license plate recognition. Using a curated dataset of 88 challenging real-world images collected in Nigeria, we evaluate five selected VLMs: Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp (Google DeepMind), Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct (Alibaba), GPT-4o (OpenAI), Claude 4 Sonnet (Anthropic), and Llama 3.2 Vision 90b (Meta). Results based on Character Error Rate (CER) reveal that Gemini and Qwen significantly outperform other models in both accuracy and robustness, on the challenging image scenarios. This work highlights the practical advantages of VLMs over YOLO+OCR, questions the claims by model providers, and compares the performances of the VLMs.

Related papers

• Sign Language Recognition in the Age of LLMs [0.2609784101826761]
  Recent Vision Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of multimodal reasoning tasks.<n>We investigate the capability of modern VLMs to perform isolated sign language recognition in a zero-shot setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T09:26:16Z)
• HALP: Detecting Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models without Generating a Single Token [4.2940165358265086]
  Hallucinations remain a persistent challenge for vision-language models (VLMs)<n>We investigate whether hallucination risk can be predicted before any token is generated by probing a model's internal representations in a single forward pass.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T18:36:31Z)
• UAOR: Uncertainty-aware Observation Reinjection for Vision-Language-Action Models [25.401818528256232]
  Uncertainty-aware Observation Reinjection (UAOR) is an effective, training-free and plug-and-play module for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models.<n>Our method consistently improves diverse VLA models across simulation and real-world tasks with minimal overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-20T06:22:21Z)
• SSL4RL: Revisiting Self-supervised Learning as Intrinsic Reward for Visual-Language Reasoning [88.9014727048442]
  SSL4RL is a novel framework that leverages self-supervised learning tasks as a source of verifiable rewards for RL-based fine-tuning.<n>Our approach reformulates SSL objectives-such as predicting image rotation or reconstructing masked patches-into dense, automatic reward signals.<n>Experiments show that SSL4RL substantially improves performance on both vision-centric and vision-language reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-18T09:22:40Z)
• Pixels to Principles: Probing Intuitive Physics Understanding in Multimodal Language Models [5.134872455507186]
  This paper presents a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on intuitive physics tasks.<n>We assess the open-source models InternVL 2.5, Qwen 2.5 VL, LLaVA-OneVision, and the proprietary Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.<n>We find that even the latest models struggle to reliably distinguish physically plausible from implausible scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T13:24:42Z)
• VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models [75.88987277686914]
  We present the Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models (VHELM) VHELM aggregates various datasets to cover one or more of the 9 aspects: visual perception, knowledge, reasoning, bias, fairness, multilinguality, robustness, toxicity, and safety. Our framework is designed to be lightweight and automatic so that evaluation runs are cheap and fast.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:46:34Z)
• VEGA: Learning Interleaved Image-Text Comprehension in Vision-Language Large Models [76.94378391979228]
  We introduce a new, more demanding task known as Interleaved Image-Text (IITC) This task challenges models to discern and disregard superfluous elements in both images and text to accurately answer questions. In support of this task, we further craft a new VEGA dataset, tailored for the IITC task on scientific content, and devised a subtask, Image-Text Association (ITA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T17:59:40Z)
• VLM-PL: Advanced Pseudo Labeling Approach for Class Incremental Object Detection via Vision-Language Model [9.122593534510512]
  We introduce Vision-Language Model assisted Pseudo-Labeling (VLM-PL) This technique uses Vision-Language Model (VLM) to verify the correctness of pseudo ground-truths (GTs) without requiring additional model training. VLM-PL integrates refined pseudo and real GTs from upcoming training, effectively combining new and old knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T14:23:00Z)
• Finer: Investigating and Enhancing Fine-Grained Visual Concept Recognition in Large Vision Language Models [57.95366341738857]
  In-depth analyses show that instruction-tuned LVLMs exhibit modality gap, showing discrepancy when given textual and visual inputs that correspond to the same concept.<n>We propose a multiple attribute-centric evaluation benchmark, Finer, to evaluate LVLMs' fine-grained visual comprehension ability and provide significantly improved explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T05:43:51Z)
• Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models [73.40350756742231]
  Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning. Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:21:14Z)
• Machine Vision Therapy: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Enhance Visual Robustness via Denoising In-Context Learning [67.0609518552321]
  We propose to conduct Machine Vision Therapy which aims to rectify the noisy predictions from vision models. By fine-tuning with the denoised labels, the learning model performance can be boosted in an unsupervised manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T07:29:14Z)
• Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Survey [62.543250338410836]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) learn rich vision-language correlation from web-scale image-text pairs. This paper provides a systematic review of visual language models for various visual recognition tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-03T02:17:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.