Doom Researching: A Conceptual Framework for Repetitive AI-Assisted Information Seeking, Cognitive Offloading, and the Illusion of Knowing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02723v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 19:18:21 GMT
• Title: Doom Researching: A Conceptual Framework for Repetitive AI-Assisted Information Seeking, Cognitive Offloading, and the Illusion of Knowing
• Abstract summary: This conceptual paper proposes the term doom researching to describe this AI-mediated pattern of repetitive information seeking.<n>The paper develops a framework in which fluent AI responses reduce cognitive effort, inflate perceived knowledge, and increase the likelihood of further querying.<n>The goal is to provide a vocabulary and research agenda for studying when AI-assisted inquiry becomes a substitute for thinking, synthesis, and action.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini have made information seeking faster, more conversational, and more cognitively comfortable. These affordances can support learning and productivity, but they can also encourage a repetitive pattern in which users continue querying AI systems for explanations, summaries, comparisons, plans, and reassurance without converting those interactions into durable understanding, decisions, or finished work. This conceptual paper proposes the term doom researching to describe this AI-mediated pattern of repetitive information seeking without proportional synthesis or output. Building on research on doomscrolling, information seeking, cognitive offloading, transactive memory, human-AI interaction, productivity loss, and the illusion of knowing, the paper develops a framework in which fluent AI responses reduce cognitive effort, inflate perceived knowledge, and increase the likelihood of further querying. The framework distinguishes doom researching from doomscrolling, cyberchondria, ordinary research, and productive AI-assisted work. It introduces a formal model of the doom researching loop, a candidate risk index for empirical measurement, and testable propositions for future studies. It then extends the construct through the lens of the extended mind thesis, distinguishing assistive, substitutive, and disruptive forms of cognitive offloading, and connects individual doom researching to the broader literature on AI-driven homogenization and knowledge collapse. The paper argues that doom researching is not simply "too much AI use" but a misalignment among inquiry, metacognition, and output. The goal is to provide a vocabulary and research agenda for studying when AI-assisted inquiry becomes a substitute for thinking, synthesis, and action.

Related papers

• Vibe Compiler: A Research-Logic Synthesis Tool That Runs without Prompt Engineering -Toward Enhancing Metacognition for Sustaining Agency in the Age of Generative AI- [0.0]
  We present the Vibe Compiler, a research-logic compiler that helps researchers transform vague ideas into coherent research logic.<n>The framework characterizes structural gaps along two dimensions: cognitive function (Synthesis vs. Analysis) and executing agent (human vs. AI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T02:51:03Z)
• AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide [107.0834449839233]
  We present an end-to-end analysis of AI across the complete research lifecycle.<n>We identify a sharp, stage-dependent boundary between reliable assistance and unreliable autonomy.<n>We show that greater automation can obscure rather than eliminate failure modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T17:08:26Z)
• Intentmaking and Sensemaking: Human Interaction with AI-Guided Mathematical Discovery [72.49593499512092]
  We identify and characterize a distinct workflow we term intentmaking.<n>We frame this as a natural extension to sensemaking.<n>Our documentation of these themes suggests an approach to designing AI tools for scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T09:30:25Z)
• Disrupting Cognitive Passivity: Rethinking AI-Assisted Data Literacy through Cognitive Alignment [17.265229093607676]
  We argue that disrupting cognitive passivity requires more dynamic and adaptive strategy through cognitive alignment.<n>In the framework, we provide the mapping between AI's interaction mode (transmissive or deliberative) and users' cognitive demand (receptive or deliberative)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T06:47:55Z)
• Bridging Minds and Machines: Toward an Integration of AI and Cognitive Science [48.38628297686686]
  Cognitive Science has profoundly shaped disciplines such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Philosophy, Psychology, Neuroscience, Linguistics, and Culture.<n>Many breakthroughs in AI trace their roots to cognitive theories, while AI itself has become an indispensable tool for advancing cognitive research.<n>We argue that the future of AI within Cognitive Science lies not only in improving performance but also in constructing systems that deepen our understanding of the human mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T11:26:17Z)
• Mapping Students' AI Literacy Framing and Learning through Reflective Journals [0.13154296174423616]
  This research paper presents a study of undergraduate technology students' self-reflective learning about artificial intelligence (AI)<n>It is important to understand what, how, and why students learn about AI so formal instruction can better support their learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T23:01:51Z)
• Scaling Laws in Scientific Discovery with AI and Robot Scientists [72.3420699173245]
  An autonomous generalist scientist (AGS) concept combines agentic AI and embodied robotics to automate the entire research lifecycle.<n>AGS aims to significantly reduce the time and resources needed for scientific discovery.<n>As these autonomous systems become increasingly integrated into the research process, we hypothesize that scientific discovery might adhere to new scaling laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T14:00:27Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We examine what is known about human wisdom and sketch a vision of its AI counterpart.<n>We argue that AI systems particularly struggle with metacognition.<n>We discuss how wise AI might be benchmarked, trained, and implemented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• Generative AI in Writing Research Papers: A New Type of Algorithmic Bias and Uncertainty in Scholarly Work [0.38850145898707145]
  Large language models (LLMs) and generative AI tools present challenges in identifying and addressing biases. generative AI tools are susceptible to goal misgeneralization, hallucinations, and adversarial attacks such as red teaming prompts. We find that incorporating generative AI in the process of writing research manuscripts introduces a new type of context-induced algorithmic bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T04:05:04Z)
• Taking the Intentional Stance Seriously: A Guide to Progress in Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  We find ourselves building mental models of how each unique tool works. This paper scrutinizes the propositional attitude of intention to clarify this claim.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T13:38:23Z)
• From Psychological Curiosity to Artificial Curiosity: Curiosity-Driven Learning in Artificial Intelligence Tasks [56.20123080771364]
  Psychological curiosity plays a significant role in human intelligence to enhance learning through exploration and information acquisition. In the Artificial Intelligence (AI) community, artificial curiosity provides a natural intrinsic motivation for efficient learning. CDL has become increasingly popular, where agents are self-motivated to learn novel knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-20T17:07:03Z)
• Thinking Fast and Slow in AI [38.8581204791644]
  This paper proposes a research direction to advance AI which draws inspiration from cognitive theories of human decision making. The premise is that if we gain insights about the causes of some human capabilities that are still lacking in AI, we may obtain similar capabilities in an AI system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T20:10:05Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.