The Good, the Bad, and the Brittle: Benchmarking Robustness and Generalisation of Histopathology Foundation Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04401v1
- Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2026 16:49:09 GMT
- Title: The Good, the Bad, and the Brittle: Benchmarking Robustness and Generalisation of Histopathology Foundation Models
- Abstract summary: We benchmarked twelve pathology foundation models (PFMs) and ResNet baselines.<n>PFMs consistently outperform CNNs in both robustness and domain generalisation, yet model scaling shows diminishing returns.<n> NR-Kfold analysis reveals systematic accuracy loss and increased variability when training-test similarity is broken.
- Score: 0.1274452325287335
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: How robust and generalisable are pathology foundation models and have their scaling limites been reached? We benchmarked twelve pathology foundation models (PFMs) and ResNet baselines using our Robustness Evaluation and Enhancement Toolbox (REET) across eleven clinically realistic perturbations and a dissimilarity-driven Non-Redundant K-fold validation (NR-Kfold) protocol. We introduce a Perturbation Performance Index (PPI) to summarise accuracy trends under controlled perturbation sweeps and analyse robustness scaling with parameter count. We show that PFMs consistently outperform CNNs in both robustness and domain generalisation, yet model scaling shows diminishing returns: mid-sized models such (UNI2/Virchow-2 etc.) achieve comparable or greater resilience than larger systems. NR-Kfold analysis further reveals systematic accuracy loss and increased variability when training-test similarity is broken, underscoring the need for explicit distribution-shift evaluation. These findings suggest that the next generation of pathology foundation models must prioritise data quality, multimodality information and domain alignment over parameter count to achieve genuine clinical reliability.
Related papers
- Probabilistic data quality assessment for structural monitoring data via outlier-resistant conditional diffusion model [9.184776098919471]
This study proposes a prediction deviation-based SHM data quality assessment method.<n>The proposed conditional diffusion model (CDM) augments the standard diffusion model to incorporate temporal context.<n>The framework significantly improves the accuracy of data quality assessment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-29T07:26:37Z) - Delving Aleatoric Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation via Vision Foundation Models [56.29123284262618]
This work proposes leveraging the universal representation capabilities of visual foundation models to estimate inherent data uncertainty.<n>We analyze the feature diversity of the model's decoded representations and quantify their singular value energy to define the semantic perception scale for each class.<n>Based on this foundation, we design two uncertainty-driven application strategies: (1) the aleatoric uncertainty-aware data filtering mechanism to eliminate potentially noisy samples and enhance model learning quality; and (2) the dynamic uncertainty-aware optimization strategy that adaptively adjusts class-specific loss weights during training based on the semantic perception scale, combined with a label denoising mechanism to improve training stability
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-13T03:59:54Z) - Bootstrapping-based Regularisation for Reducing Individual Prediction Instability in Clinical Risk Prediction Models [2.1127261244588156]
We propose a novel bootstrapping-based regularisation framework that embeds the bootstrapping process directly into the training of deep neural networks.<n>This approach constrains prediction variability across resampled datasets, producing a single model with inherent stability properties.<n>We evaluated models constructed using the proposed regularisation approach against conventional and ensemble models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-11T20:47:30Z) - Investigating the Impact of Histopathological Foundation Models on Regressive Prediction of Homologous Recombination Deficiency [52.50039435394964]
We systematically evaluate foundation models for regression-based tasks.<n>We extract patch-level features from whole slide images (WSI) using five state-of-the-art foundation models.<n>Models are trained to predict continuous HRD scores based on these extracted features across breast, endometrial, and lung cancer cohorts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T14:06:50Z) - Testing and Improving the Robustness of Amortized Bayesian Inference for Cognitive Models [0.5223954072121659]
Contaminant observations and outliers often cause problems when estimating the parameters of cognitive models.<n>In this study, we test and improve the robustness of parameter estimation using amortized Bayesian inference.<n>The proposed method is straightforward and practical to implement and has a broad applicability in fields where outlier detection or removal is challenging.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-29T21:22:24Z) - Machine Learning for ALSFRS-R Score Prediction: Making Sense of the Sensor Data [44.99833362998488]
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease that presents individuals with limited treatment options.
The present investigation, spearheaded by the iDPP@CLEF 2024 challenge, focuses on utilizing sensor-derived data obtained through an app.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-10T19:17:23Z) - Predictive Analytics of Varieties of Potatoes [2.336821989135698]
We explore the application of machine learning algorithms specifically to enhance the selection process of Russet potato clones in breeding trials.
This study addresses the challenge of efficiently identifying high-yield, disease-resistant, and climate-resilient potato varieties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T00:49:05Z) - Benchmarking Zero-Shot Robustness of Multimodal Foundation Models: A Pilot Study [61.65123150513683]
multimodal foundation models, such as CLIP, produce state-of-the-art zero-shot results.
It is reported that these models close the robustness gap by matching the performance of supervised models trained on ImageNet.
We show that CLIP leads to a significant robustness drop compared to supervised ImageNet models on our benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-15T17:33:49Z) - GREAT Score: Global Robustness Evaluation of Adversarial Perturbation using Generative Models [60.48306899271866]
We present a new framework, called GREAT Score, for global robustness evaluation of adversarial perturbation using generative models.
We show high correlation and significantly reduced cost of GREAT Score when compared to the attack-based model ranking on RobustBench.
GREAT Score can be used for remote auditing of privacy-sensitive black-box models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-19T14:58:27Z) - UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced
Data [81.00385374948125]
We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model.
UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data.
We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)
UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z) - Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under
Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation.
We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.