Large-Scale Portfolio Optimization Problem Under Cardinality Constraint With Enhanced Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09566v1
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:12:58 GMT
- Title: Large-Scale Portfolio Optimization Problem Under Cardinality Constraint With Enhanced Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms
- Abstract summary: Portfolio optimization seeks to determine how much an investor should invest in which asset.<n>New mating strategies along with the aforesaid package are implemented in well-known multi-objective evolutionary algorithms.<n>Results indicate that the proposed strategy not only provides better approximations but also converges faster as well at no loss of performance.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Decision-making is posing an increasingly formidable challenge to investors because of the growing number of alternatives available in financial markets. A hot area of research over the past few decades has been portfolio optimization that seeks to determine how much an investor should invest in which asset. Introducing real-world conditions to the optimization model turns the problem into an NP-hard one for whose solution exact methods become inefficient; hence, researchers have turned to evolutionary algorithms to approximate solutions. In this paper, strengthening strategies are presented for multi-objective evolutionary algorithms that can provide a faster convergence rate and extensive search ability in the portfolio optimization problem under the cardinality constraint. To implement those features, a unique solution representation, a novel operator, and new repair mechanisms are introduced for solving the aforementioned problem in which lower and upper limits are set on the number of assets in the portfolio. For this purpose, new mating strategies along with the aforesaid package are implemented in well-known multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to solve the problem. The customized algorithms are subsequently tested against traditional ones using well-known market indices as benchmarks. Results indicate that the proposed strategy not only provides better approximations but also converges faster as well at no loss of performance with an increasing number of assets in the market.
Related papers
- FrontierOR: Benchmarking LLMs' Capacity for Efficient Algorithm Design in Large-Scale Optimization [61.43300970020897]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for optimization modeling and solver-code generation.<n>Existing benchmarks are limited to small or simplified examples far below real-world scale and complexity.<n>We introduce FrontierOR, among the first benchmarks to evaluate LLM-based efficient algorithm design for realistic large-scale optimization problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-24T20:10:42Z) - AdaEvolve: Adaptive LLM Driven Zeroth-Order Optimization [61.535567824938205]
We introduce AdaEvolve, a framework that reformulates LLM-driven evolution as a hierarchical adaptive optimization problem.<n>AdaEvolve consistently outperforms the open-ended baselines across 185 different open-ended optimization problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-23T18:45:31Z) - LLM Agents for Combinatorial Efficient Frontiers: Investment Portfolio Optimization [0.0]
This study implements a novel agentic framework for the Cardinality Constrained Mean-Variance Portfolio Optimization problem.<n>In benchmark problems, the implemented agentic framework matches state-of-the-art algorithms.<n>Complex and algorithm development efforts are alleviated, while in the worst case, lower but acceptable error is reported.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-02T18:02:13Z) - PlanGEN: A Multi-Agent Framework for Generating Planning and Reasoning Trajectories for Complex Problem Solving [89.60370366013142]
We propose PlanGEN, a model-agnostic and easily scalable agent framework with three key components: constraint, verification, and selection agents.<n>Specifically, our approach proposes constraint-guided iterative verification to enhance performance of inference-time algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-22T06:21:56Z) - Un-evaluated Solutions May Be Valuable in Expensive Optimization [5.6787965501364335]
We propose a strategic approach that incorporates high-quality, un-evaluated solutions predicted by surrogate models during the selection phase.<n>This approach aims to improve the distribution of evaluated solutions, thereby generating a superior next generation of solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-05T04:06:30Z) - Deep Reinforcement Learning for Online Optimal Execution Strategies [49.1574468325115]
This paper tackles the challenge of learning non-Markovian optimal execution strategies in dynamic financial markets.
We introduce a novel actor-critic algorithm based on Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG)
We show that our algorithm successfully approximates the optimal execution strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T12:38:08Z) - Diversifying Investments and Maximizing Sharpe Ratio: a novel QUBO
formulation [0.0]
We propose a new QUBO formulation for the task described and provide the mathematical details and required assumptions.
We derive results via the available QUBO solvers, as well as discussing the behaviour of Hybrid approaches to tackle large scale problems in the term.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T19:15:44Z) - Backpropagation of Unrolled Solvers with Folded Optimization [55.04219793298687]
The integration of constrained optimization models as components in deep networks has led to promising advances on many specialized learning tasks.
One typical strategy is algorithm unrolling, which relies on automatic differentiation through the operations of an iterative solver.
This paper provides theoretical insights into the backward pass of unrolled optimization, leading to a system for generating efficiently solvable analytical models of backpropagation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-28T01:50:42Z) - Socio-cognitive Optimization of Time-delay Control Problems using
Evolutionary Metaheuristics [89.24951036534168]
Metaheuristics are universal optimization algorithms which should be used for solving difficult problems, unsolvable by classic approaches.
In this paper we aim at constructing novel socio-cognitive metaheuristic based on castes, and apply several versions of this algorithm to optimization of time-delay system model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-23T22:21:10Z) - Comparing Classical-Quantum Portfolio Optimization with Enhanced
Constraints [0.0]
We show how to add fundamental analysis to the portfolio optimization problem, adding in asset-specific and global constraints based on chosen balance sheet metrics.
We analyze the current state-of-the-art algorithms for solving such a problem using D-Wave's Quantum Processor and compare the quality of the solutions obtained to commercially-available optimization software.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-09T17:46:32Z) - Portfolio Search and Optimization for General Strategy Game-Playing [58.896302717975445]
We propose a new algorithm for optimization and action-selection based on the Rolling Horizon Evolutionary Algorithm.
For the optimization of the agents' parameters and portfolio sets we study the use of the N-tuple Bandit Evolutionary Algorithm.
An analysis of the agents' performance shows that the proposed algorithm generalizes well to all game-modes and is able to outperform other portfolio methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-21T09:28:28Z) - PAMELI: A Meta-Algorithm for Computationally Expensive Multi-Objective
Optimization Problems [0.0]
The proposed algorithm is based on solving a set of surrogate problems defined by models of the real one.
Our algorithm also performs a meta-search for optimal surrogate models and navigation strategies for the optimization landscape.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-19T11:18:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.