Agora: Enhancing LLM Agent Reasoning Via Auction-Based Task Allocation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09600v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:54:52 GMT
• Title: Agora: Enhancing LLM Agent Reasoning Via Auction-Based Task Allocation
• Abstract summary: Agora is a framework that introduces an incentive-compatible auction mechanism for dynamically allocating tasks to expert models and tools.<n>We show that Agora improves over matched single-model, routing, and cascade baselines under comparable candidate pools.
• Score: 22.035822429032894
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language model (LLM) agents requires effective orchestration of diverse expert models and tools. However, existing frameworks typically call APIs based on coarse-grained matching between tasks and the functions of expert models or tools, while overlooking critical factors such as performance variability and cost efficiency among functionally similar alternatives. To address this, we propose Agora, a framework that introduces an incentive-compatible auction mechanism for dynamically allocating tasks to expert models and tools. By treating reasoning steps as tradeable items, Agora enables agents to bid based on their rectified competence-ensuring that critical logic is routed to the most capable solver rather than the most overconfident one. Evaluations across five benchmarks show that Agora improves over matched single-model, routing, and cascade baselines under comparable candidate pools, while exposing a controllable cost-quality trade-off through a single auction parameter.

Related papers

• Beyond LLM-Based Reasoning: Lightweight GNNs for Agent Failure Attribution [47.70578021328887]
  Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems often exhibit complex failure modes.<n>We introduce AFANet, a lightweight graph-based framework that models interaction trajectories through step-level semantic signals and agent-level relationships.<n>Our results suggest that effective agent failure attribution does not require heavy reasoning and a lightweight, structured approach can achieve strong performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-19T06:16:09Z)
• EASy: Towards Efficient LLM-Based Agentic System [54.10819421625103]
  We propose EASy, a trainable agentic framework that jointly optimize task performance and computational efficiency through reinforcement learning.<n> EASy equips an LLM-based orchestrator with explicit knowledge of the capability and cost profiles of heterogeneous executors, enabling context-sensitive coordination beyond performance-only routing.<n>It further introduces a milestone-plan-act workflow that decomposes complex tasks into manageable milestones, constructs dependency-aware execution graphs, assigns suitable executors, and parallelizes independent steps while adapting subsequent decisions to intermediate outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T08:50:36Z)
• From Atomic Actions to Standard Operating Procedures: Iterative Tool Optimization for Self-Evolving LLM Agents [90.3279207163486]
  EvoSOP is a framework that empowers agents to extract SOPs from execution trajectories and iteratively optimize the toolset.<n>We show that EvoSOP significantly boosts task success rates while substantially reducing the number of interaction rounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T12:09:49Z)
• FAMA: Failure-Aware Meta-Agentic Framework for Open-Source LLMs in Interactive Tool Use Environments [60.3427704389541]
  Large Language Models are being increasingly deployed as the decision-making core of autonomous agents.<n>Yet, in conversational benchmarks, these agents frequently fail due to the cascading effects of incorrect decision-making.<n>We present the Failure-Aware Meta-Agentic framework to tackle these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T02:21:53Z)
• RPA-Check: A Multi-Stage Automated Framework for Evaluating Dynamic LLM-based Role-Playing Agents [4.07447364754644]
  This paper introduces RPA-Check, a multi-stage automated evaluation framework designed to objectively assess the performance of LLM-based RPAs.<n>We validate this framework by applying it to LLM Court, a serious game for forensic training involving several quantized local models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T16:08:03Z)
• Explainable Model Routing for Agentic Workflows [0.9379969114114787]
  Topaz is a framework that introduces formal auditability to agentic routing.<n>We present Topaz, a framework that introduces formal auditability to agentic routing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-04T00:11:24Z)
• AgentCollab: A Self-Evaluation-Driven Collaboration Paradigm for Efficient LLM Agents [37.232397795331444]
  We present AgentCollab, a self-driven collaborative inference framework that dynamically coordinates models with different reasoning capacities during agent execution.<n>Instead of relying on external routing modules, the framework uses the agent's own self-reflection signal to determine whether the current reasoning trajectory is making meaningful progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-27T03:07:34Z)
• Beyond Unimodal Shortcuts: MLLMs as Cross-Modal Reasoners for Grounded Named Entity Recognition [51.68340973140949]
  Multimodal Named Entity Recognition (GMNER) aims to extract text-based entities, assign them semantic categories, and ground them to corresponding visual regions.<n> MLLMs exhibit $textbfmodality bias$, including visual bias and textual bias, which stems from their tendency to take unimodal shortcuts.<n>We propose Modality-aware Consistency Reasoning ($bfMCR$), which enforces structured cross-modal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T12:12:49Z)
• Refer-Agent: A Collaborative Multi-Agent System with Reasoning and Reflection for Referring Video Object Segmentation [50.22481337087162]
  Referring Video Object (RVOS) aims to segment objects in videos based on textual queries.<n>Refer-Agent is a collaborative multi-agent system with alternating reasoning-reflection mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T14:48:12Z)
• A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Reasoning: From Single-Model to Multi-Agent Paradigms [20.241519889633285]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as reasoning systems, where reasoning paradigms play a critical role.<n>We conduct a comprehensive and unified evaluation of reasoning paradigms, spanning direct single-model generation, CoT-augmented single-model reasoning, and representative MAS.<n>We introduce MIMeBench, a new open-ended benchmark that targets two foundational yet underexplored semantic capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T17:23:45Z)
• Learning to Use Tools via Cooperative and Interactive Agents [58.77710337157665]
  Tool learning empowers large language models (LLMs) as agents to use external tools and extend their utility. We propose ConAgents, a Cooperative and interactive Agents framework, which coordinates three specialized agents for tool selection, tool execution, and action calibration separately. Our experiments on three datasets show that the LLMs, when equipped with ConAgents, outperform baselines with substantial improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T15:08:16Z)
• Towards Robust Multi-Modal Reasoning via Model Selection [7.6621866737827045]
  LLM serves as the "brain" of the agent, orchestrating multiple tools for collaborative multi-step task solving. We propose the $textitM3$ framework as a plug-in with negligible runtime overhead at test-time. Our experiments reveal that our framework enables dynamic model selection, considering both user inputs and subtask dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T16:06:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.