Modernizing HEBO: a robust Bayesian optimization baseline for practical heteroskedastic and non-stationary problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10669v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 09:27:57 GMT
• Title: Modernizing HEBO: a robust Bayesian optimization baseline for practical heteroskedastic and non-stationary problems
• Abstract summary: tidyHEBO is a robust Bayesian optimization model inspired by heteroskedastic evolutionary Bayesian optimization (HEBO)<n> tidyHEBO reconstructs the HEBO design philosophy in BoTorch and revises surrogate training, output-warping selection and acquisition function evaluation.<n>We benchmarked tidyHEBO on synthetic functions, fully experimental reaction-optimization datasets and needle-in-a-haystack (NIAH) materials problems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Bayesian optimization is increasingly used to guide data-efficient experimentation in chemistry, materials science, and related laboratory settings, but its practical performance depends strongly on how well surrogate-model assumptions match the geometry and noise structure of the underlying objective. We introduce tidyHEBO, a robust Bayesian optimization model inspired by heteroskedastic evolutionary Bayesian optimization (HEBO) for single-objective, sequential optimization. tidyHEBO reconstructs the HEBO design philosophy in BoTorch and revises surrogate training, output-warping selection, acquisition function evaluation, and Pareto-front search. We benchmarked tidyHEBO on synthetic functions, Olympus emulators, fully experimental reaction-optimization datasets, needle-in-a-haystack (NIAH) materials problems, and Bayesmark hyperparameter optimization tasks. On these tasks tidyHEBO achieved competitive to superior performance and improvement in robustness across repeated optimization runs. We therefore propose tidyHEBO as a practical tool for sequential experimentations and a strong general-purpose benchmark for future Bayesian optimization research.

Related papers

• Frugal Bayesian Optimization: Scalable Surrogates for Data- and Resource-Limited Discovery [0.6927055673104934]
  We evaluate four surrogate models: Gaussian Process, Random Forests, NGBoost, and Bayesian Adaptive Spline Surfaces.<n>We show that Gaussian Process-based BO incurs the highest time and memory overhead without delivering superior optimization or sample efficiency.<n>We introduce a surrogate-recommendation framework that predicts the most suitable BO surrogate from inexpensive dataset characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T09:55:38Z)
• Benchmarking Generative AI Against Bayesian Optimization for Constrained Multi-Objective Inverse Design [0.15293427903448018]
  This paper investigates the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) as generative feasibles for solving constrained multi-objective regression tasks.<n>The best-performing LLM (Math-7B) achieved a Generational Distance (GD) of 1.21, significantly outperforming the traditional BoTorch Ax baseline.<n>The findings have direct industrial applications in optimizing formulation design for resins, rheological, and chemical properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T10:37:09Z)
• Optimizing the Unknown: Black Box Bayesian Optimization with Energy-Based Model and Reinforcement Learning [42.508822373669936]
  Black-Box Optimization (BBO) has achieved success across various scientific and engineering domains.<n>We propose the Reinforced Energy-Based Model for Bayesian Optimization (REBMBO), which integrates Gaussian Processes (GP) for local guidance with an Energy-Based Model (EBM) to capture global structural information.<n>We conduct extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks, confirming the superior performance of REBMBO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T12:36:49Z)
• Enhanced Bayesian Optimization via Preferential Modeling of Abstract Properties [49.351577714596544]
  We propose a human-AI collaborative Bayesian framework to incorporate expert preferences about unmeasured abstract properties into surrogate modeling. We provide an efficient strategy that can also handle any incorrect/misleading expert bias in preferential judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T09:23:13Z)
• An Empirical Evaluation of Zeroth-Order Optimization Methods on AI-driven Molecule Optimization [78.36413169647408]
  We study the effectiveness of various ZO optimization methods for optimizing molecular objectives. We show the advantages of ZO sign-based gradient descent (ZO-signGD) We demonstrate the potential effectiveness of ZO optimization methods on widely used benchmark tasks from the Guacamol suite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T01:58:10Z)
• Surrogate modeling for Bayesian optimization beyond a single Gaussian process [62.294228304646516]
  We propose a novel Bayesian surrogate model to balance exploration with exploitation of the search space. To endow function sampling with scalability, random feature-based kernel approximation is leveraged per GP model. To further establish convergence of the proposed EGP-TS to the global optimum, analysis is conducted based on the notion of Bayesian regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T16:43:10Z)
• DEBOSH: Deep Bayesian Shape Optimization [48.80431740983095]
  We propose a novel uncertainty-based method tailored to shape optimization. It enables effective BO and increases the quality of the resulting shapes beyond that of state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T11:01:42Z)
• Pre-trained Gaussian Processes for Bayesian Optimization [24.730678780782647]
  We propose a new pre-training based BO framework named HyperBO. We show bounded posterior predictions and near-zero regrets for HyperBO without assuming the "ground truth" GP prior is known.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T20:46:26Z)
• Are we Forgetting about Compositional Optimisers in Bayesian Optimisation? [66.39551991177542]
  This paper presents a sample methodology for global optimisation. Within this, a crucial performance-determiningtrivial is maximising the acquisition function. We highlight the empirical advantages of the approach to optimise functionation across 3958 individual experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T12:18:38Z)
• Bayesian Optimization for Selecting Efficient Machine Learning Models [53.202224677485525]
  We present a unified Bayesian Optimization framework for jointly optimizing models for both prediction effectiveness and training efficiency. Experiments on model selection for recommendation tasks indicate models selected this way significantly improves model training efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T02:56:30Z)
• BOSH: Bayesian Optimization by Sampling Hierarchically [10.10241176664951]
  We propose a novel BO routine pairing a hierarchical Gaussian process with an information-theoretic framework to generate a growing pool of realizations. We demonstrate that BOSH provides more efficient and higher-precision optimization than standard BO across synthetic benchmarks, simulation optimization, reinforcement learning and hyper- parameter tuning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T07:35:49Z)
• Incorporating Expert Prior Knowledge into Experimental Design via Posterior Sampling [58.56638141701966]
  Experimenters can often acquire the knowledge about the location of the global optimum. It is unknown how to incorporate the expert prior knowledge about the global optimum into Bayesian optimization. An efficient Bayesian optimization approach has been proposed via posterior sampling on the posterior distribution of the global optimum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T01:57:36Z)
• Scalable Constrained Bayesian Optimization [10.820024633762596]
  The global optimization of a high-dimensional black-box function under black-box constraints is a pervasive task in machine learning, control, and the scientific community. We propose the scalable constrained Bayesian optimization (SCBO) algorithm that overcomes the above challenges and pushes the state-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T01:48:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.