Toward Contemplative LLM: A Modular Framework for Evaluating and Enhancing LLM Alignment in Mental Health

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10871v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 18:23:52 GMT
• Title: Toward Contemplative LLM: A Modular Framework for Evaluating and Enhancing LLM Alignment in Mental Health
• Abstract summary: Contemplative principles may offer a promising paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs)<n>We present a modular evaluation framework that enables seamless integration of new models, metrics, and benchmarks.<n>This work lays the groundwork for interdisciplinary research spanning cognitive science, behavioral economics, philosophy, and system design.
• Score: 3.8407594886993004
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Contemplative traditions have long guided ethical behavior and prosocial interaction, and recent work suggests that contemplative principles (e.g., mindfulness, compassion, non-dual reasoning) may offer a promising paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs), improving cooperation and reducing ethical violations in LLM outputs. However, as new models, evaluation metrics, and benchmarks emerge rapidly, it remains challenging to systematically assess whether and how contemplative principles enhance LLM alignment across diverse and evolving scenarios, and existing approaches are often ad hoc and fail to generalize. We present a modular, extensible evaluation framework, initially targeted at the mental health domain, that enables seamless integration of new models, metrics, and benchmarks through a reusable pipeline. The framework currently reproduces existing state-of-the-art results and supports systematic cross-evaluation by flexibly mixing and matching models, metrics, and benchmarks, enabling fair comparison and deeper insight. Its plug-and-play prompting module offers a principled pathway for incorporating ethical perspectives such as contemplative principles, allowing domain experts to define alignment criteria without requiring technical expertise. Although initially focused on mental health, the framework is domain-agnostic and extends naturally to areas such as decision-making, moral reasoning, and human-AI collaboration. By bridging computational evaluation with human-centered ethical reasoning, this work lays the groundwork for interdisciplinary research spanning cognitive science, behavioral economics, philosophy, and system design, toward robust, trustworthy, and socially beneficial human-AI ecosystems.

Related papers

• Large Language Models as a Semantic Interface and Ethical Mediator in Neuro-Digital Ecosystems: Conceptual Foundations and a Regulatory Imperative [83.99688944263843]
  This article introduces and substantiates the concept of Neuro-Linguistic Integration (NLI)<n>It is a novel paradigm for human-technology interaction where Large Language Models act as a key semantic interface between raw neural data and their social application.<n>We argue for the development of a second-order neuroethics,' focused not merely on neural data protection but on the ethics of AI-mediated semantic interpretation itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T07:34:17Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
  We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z)
• Mirror: A Multi-Agent System for AI-Assisted Ethics Review [104.3684024153469]
  Mirror is an agentic framework for AI-assisted ethical review.<n>It integrates ethical reasoning, structured rule interpretation, and multi-agent deliberation within a unified architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T03:38:55Z)
• A Survey of Vibe Coding with Large Language Models [93.88284590533242]
  "Vibe Coding" is a development methodology where developers validate AI-generated implementations through outcome observation.<n>Despite its transformative potential, the effectiveness of this emergent paradigm remains under-explored.<n>This survey provides the first comprehensive and systematic review of Vibe Coding with large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T11:26:56Z)
• Alignment and Safety in Large Language Models: Safety Mechanisms, Training Paradigms, and Emerging Challenges [47.14342587731284]
  This survey provides a comprehensive overview of alignment techniques, training protocols, and empirical findings in large language models (LLMs) alignment.<n>We analyze the development of alignment methods across diverse paradigms, characterizing the fundamental trade-offs between core alignment objectives.<n>We discuss state-of-the-art techniques, including Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), Constitutional AI, brain-inspired methods, and alignment uncertainty quantification (AUQ)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T20:52:58Z)
• Wide Reflective Equilibrium in LLM Alignment: Bridging Moral Epistemology and AI Safety [0.0]
  This paper argues that the Method of Wide Reflective Equilibrium (MWRE) offers a uniquely apt framework for understanding current AI alignment efforts.<n>MWRE emphasizes the achievement of coherence between our considered moral judgments, guiding moral principles, and relevant background theories.<n>The paper demonstrates that MWRE serves as a valuable foundational for critically analyzing current alignment efforts and for guiding the future development of more ethically sound and justifiably aligned AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-31T06:40:59Z)
• Large Language Model Psychometrics: A Systematic Review of Evaluation, Validation, and Enhancement [16.608577295968942]
  Review paper introduces and synthesizes the emerging interdisciplinary field of LLM Psychometrics.<n>Psychometrics quantify intangible aspects of human psychology, such as personality, values, and intelligence.<n>Ultimately, the review provides actionable insights for developing future evaluation paradigms that align with human-level AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T05:47:51Z)
• The Convergent Ethics of AI? Analyzing Moral Foundation Priorities in Large Language Models with a Multi-Framework Approach [6.0972634521845475]
  This paper introduces the Priorities in Reasoning and Intrinsic Moral Evaluation (PRIME) framework.<n>PRIME is a comprehensive methodology for analyzing moral priorities across foundational ethical dimensions.<n>We apply this framework to six leading large language models (LLMs) through a dual-protocol approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-27T14:26:48Z)
• A Conceptual Framework for Ethical Evaluation of Machine Learning Systems [12.887834116390358]
  Ethical implications appear when designing evaluations of machine learning systems. We present a utility framework, characterizing the key trade-off in ethical evaluation as balancing information gain against potential ethical harms. Our analysis underscores the critical need for development teams to deliberately assess and manage ethical complexities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T01:06:49Z)
• Inadequacies of Large Language Model Benchmarks in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence [5.147767778946168]
  We critically assess 23 state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) benchmarks. Our research uncovered significant limitations, including biases, difficulties in measuring genuine reasoning, adaptability, implementation inconsistencies, prompt engineering complexity, diversity, and the overlooking of cultural and ideological norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T11:08:10Z)
• MR-GSM8K: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Model Evaluation [60.65820977963331]
  We introduce a novel evaluation paradigm for Large Language Models (LLMs) This paradigm shifts the emphasis from result-oriented assessments, which often neglect the reasoning process, to a more comprehensive evaluation. By applying this paradigm in the GSM8K dataset, we have developed the MR-GSM8K benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T15:49:43Z)
• Rethinking Model Evaluation as Narrowing the Socio-Technical Gap [47.632123167141245]
  We argue that model evaluation practices must take on a critical task to cope with the challenges and responsibilities brought by this homogenization.<n>We urge the community to develop evaluation methods based on real-world contexts and human requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T00:01:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.