Discourse-Aware Policy Analysis with Argumentation: A Hybrid LLM-Symbolic Framework for Disaster Governance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13260v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 20:47:38 GMT
• Title: Discourse-Aware Policy Analysis with Argumentation: A Hybrid LLM-Symbolic Framework for Disaster Governance
• Abstract summary: Apaf is a hybrid LLM--symbolic pipeline that operationalizes critical discourse analysis as a quantitative bipolar argumentation framework over policy text.<n>We release a novel dataset of 100 sub- documents of disaster-risk-reduction policy from the USA, UK, Canada, and Australia.
• Score: 4.125187280299246
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Policy documents shape governance outcomes, but their reasoning is often implicit. Participatory commitments and managerial control routinely coexist in the same text, and the tensions between them are rarely stated directly. Existing computational approaches to policy discourse cannot express the frame-mediated relations that drive these tensions, where one argument narrows or instrumentalizes another rather than rejecting it. End-to-end summarization by large language models produces fluent text but offers little structure that domain experts can inspect or contest. We present Apaf, a hybrid LLM--symbolic pipeline that operationalizes critical discourse analysis as a quantitative bipolar argumentation framework over policy text. Arguments are first classified into deliberative or managerial frames. Four frame-mediated relation subtypes (agency reduction, agenda shift, instrumental support, and normative support) are then produced by deterministic rules over LLM-extracted features. We release a novel dataset of 100 sub-documents of disaster-risk-reduction policy from the USA, UK, Canada, and Australia, and show that the resulting argument graphs are accurate, interpretable, and stable across jurisdictions.

Related papers

• PolicyMem: Geometric Policy Memory for LLM Governance [72.04962480384322]
  We introduce PolicyMem, a geometric policy memory that externalizes natural-language policies as reusable geometric memory objects.<n>A memory writer compiles natural-language policies into policy memory slots, and query-response pairs read the policy memory through projection energy.<n>The resulting policy-evidence profile directly mediates the safety verdict and is reused for policy attribution and post-intervention verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-12T06:07:43Z)
• Inference-Time Steering for Cross-Lingual Factual Consistency in LLMs [51.56484100374058]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable multilingual fluency, but their internal knowledge representations remain disproportionately biased toward high-resource languages.<n>We investigate whether these biases can be mitigated at inference time, forcing an English-prompted model to answer as if it were queried in target languages.<n>Experiments on Gemma 3 12B Instruct reveal persona prompting to be the strongest overall intervention, balancing efficacy, safety, and out-of-domain generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-21T16:15:05Z)
• PolicyLLM: Towards Excellent Comprehension of Public Policy for Large Language Models [56.37206340175191]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into real-world decision-making.<n>Yet, their ability to comprehend and reason about policy-related content remains underexplored.<n>We present textbftextitPolicyBench, the first large-scale cross-system benchmark (US-China) evaluating policy comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T17:27:50Z)
• LLM-based Argument Mining meets Argumentation and Description Logics: a Unified Framework for Reasoning about Debates [18.314315278861073]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong performance in analyzing and generating text.<n>They struggle with explicit, transparent, and verifiable reasoning over complex texts such as those containing debates.<n>We propose a framework that integrates learning-based argument mining with quantitative reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T11:06:23Z)
• Doc-PP: Document Policy Preservation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [13.70855540464427]
  We introduce Doc-PP, a novel benchmark constructed from real-world reports requiring reasoning across heterogeneous visual and textual elements under strict non-disclosure policies.<n>Our evaluation highlights a systemic Reasoning-Induced Safety Gap: models frequently leak sensitive information when answers must be inferred through complex synthesis or aggregated across modalities.<n>We propose DVA, a structural inference framework that decouples reasoning from policy verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T13:45:39Z)
• Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z)
• Implicit Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey [67.53966514728383]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong generalization across a wide range of tasks.<n>Recent studies have shifted attention from explicit chain-of-thought prompting toward implicit reasoning.<n>This survey introduces a taxonomy centered on execution paradigms, shifting the focus from representational forms to computational strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T14:16:02Z)
• An Ontology-Driven Graph RAG for Legal Norms: A Structural, Temporal, and Deterministic Approach [0.0]
  RAG systems in the legal domain face a critical challenge: standard, flat-text retrieval is blind to the hierarchical, diachronic, and causal structure of law, leading to anachronistic and unreliable answers.<n>This paper introduces the Structure-Aware Temporal Graph RAG (SAT-Graph RAG), an ontology-driven framework designed to overcome these limitations by explicitly modeling the formal structure and diachronic nature of legal norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T18:36:57Z)
• Strategies for political-statement segmentation and labelling in unstructured text [2.5338097608867542]
  A large corpus of manifestos with by-statement political-stance labels has been created by the participants of the MARPOR project.<n>We propose and test a range of unified split-and-label frameworks that can be used to jointly segment and classify statements from raw textual data.<n>We show that our approaches achieve competitive accuracy when applied to raw text of political manifestos, and then demonstrate the research potential of our method by applying it to the records of the UK House of Commons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T10:56:06Z)
• Few-shot Policy (de)composition in Conversational Question Answering [54.259440408606515]
  We propose a neuro-symbolic framework to detect policy compliance using large language models (LLMs) in a few-shot setting.<n>We show that our approach soundly reasons about policy compliance conversations by extracting sub-questions to be answered, assigning truth values from contextual information, and explicitly producing a set of logic statements from the given policies.<n>We apply this approach to the popular PCD and conversational machine reading benchmark, ShARC, and show competitive performance with no task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T08:40:15Z)
• Exploring the Jungle of Bias: Political Bias Attribution in Language Models via Dependency Analysis [86.49858739347412]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked intense debate regarding the prevalence of bias in these models and its mitigation. We propose a prompt-based method for the extraction of confounding and mediating attributes which contribute to the decision process. We find that the observed disparate treatment can at least in part be attributed to confounding and mitigating attributes and model misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T00:02:25Z)
• Sentiment Analysis through LLM Negotiations [58.67939611291001]
  A standard paradigm for sentiment analysis is to rely on a singular LLM and makes the decision in a single round. This paper introduces a multi-LLM negotiation framework for sentiment analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T12:35:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.