From Collaboration to Regulation: Characterizing Governance Practice in Three Deep Learning Open Source Communities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19022v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:13:20 GMT
• Title: From Collaboration to Regulation: Characterizing Governance Practice in Three Deep Learning Open Source Communities
• Abstract summary: Collaboration in Open Source Software (OSS) projects creates substantial coordination and quality-control challenges.<n>Project maintainers have limited systematic guidance on what rules to codify, when to introduce or revise them, and how to organize them across documents.<n>We analyzed 109 documents and identified 17 rule themes across seven rule types.
• Score: 12.4881762708727
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Collaboration in Open Source Software (OSS) projects creates substantial coordination and quality-control challenges across diverse contributor bases. Projects address these challenges through documented governance rules, yet maintainers have limited systematic guidance on what rules to codify, when to introduce or revise them, and how to organize them across documents. We conducted a mixed-methods empirical study of three mature deep learning frameworks: PyTorch, TensorFlow, and Paddle. Using the Institutional Analysis and Development framework, we analyzed 109 documents and identified 17 rule themes across seven rule types. Operational rules, such as workflows, appeared across all three projects, whereas structural rules, such as role hierarchies, varied more substantially. Tracing more than 1,700 commits, we found that operational rule themes generally appeared earlier and were revised more frequently, while many structural rule themes emerged later and changed less often. Rule-bearing content also became increasingly specialized across task- and role-specific files. We further identified four governance functions reflected in substantive rule changes: Norm Alignment, Workflow Refinement, Coordination Structuring, and Community and Governance Development. Synthesizing these findings, we derive 33 actionable governance practices for mature, large-scale OSS projects with substantial coordination demands and organizational involvement.

Related papers

• Making Agent-Mediated Contributions Governable: A Project-Level Governance Manifest for Open-Source AI Collaboration [12.77923521434568]
  Generative AI and coding agents are intensifying a central governance tension in open-source software.<n>Existing responses improve agent-readability and traceability, but project rules must also organize contribution-specific risk, evidence, accountability, and review-gate states.<n>We theorize this organizational arrangement as project-side governability infrastructure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T08:58:54Z)
• LLawCo: Learning Laws of Cooperation for Modeling Embodied Multi-Agent Behavior [51.25229110468212]
  Embodied agents operating in decentralized environments often exhibit behaviors that are misaligned with their partners or inconsistent with the environment state.<n>We propose a novel framework, Learning Laws of Cooperation, that enables embodied agents to autonomously align with both their partners and task objectives.<n>Our framework allows agents to reflect on past failures to extract misaligned behavioral patterns, which are used to derive high-level behavioral laws, such as "Talk when necessary" and "Wait for partner"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-26T15:26:12Z)
• OrgAgent: Organize Your Multi-Agent System like a Company [75.47076168155817]
  We introduce OrgAgent, a company-style hierarchical multi-agent framework.<n>We find that multi-agent systems organized in a company-style hierarchy generally outperform other organizational structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T15:21:14Z)
• Governance in Practice: How Open Source Projects Define and Document Roles [11.213029205609146]
  Open source software (OSS) sustainability depends not only on code contributions but also on governance structures that define who decides, who acts, and how responsibility is distributed.<n>This paper investigates how OSS projects define and structure governance through their GOVERNANCE.md files and related documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T23:50:27Z)
• Compliance as Code: A Study of Linux Distributions and Beyond [0.5735035463793009]
  The paper presents an empirical analysis of a compliance as code project addressing open source software (OSS) projects and products.<n>The dataset examined covers a little over 1,500 unique compliance rules designed and implemented for 14 Linux distribution releases from five vendors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T06:50:28Z)
• Deriving and Validating Requirements Engineering Principles for Large-Scale Agile Development: An Industrial Longitudinal Study [2.8007318122183182]
  In large scale agile systems development, the lack of a unified requirements engineering process is a major challenge.<n>To address this challenge, we conducted a five year longitudinal case study with Grundfos AB.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T16:01:10Z)
• Compliance-to-Code: Enhancing Financial Compliance Checking via Code Generation [36.166087396386445]
  We present Compliance-to-Code, the first large-scale Chinese dataset dedicated to financial regulatory compliance.<n> Covering 1,159 annotated clauses from 361 regulations across ten categories, each clause is modularly structured with four logical elements-subject, condition, constraint, and contextual information-along with regulation relations.<n>We provide deterministic Python code mappings, detailed code reasoning, and code explanations to facilitate automated auditing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T10:38:32Z)
• RIRAG: Regulatory Information Retrieval and Answer Generation [51.998738311700095]
  We introduce a task of generating question-passages pairs, where questions are automatically created and paired with relevant regulatory passages.<n>We create the ObliQA dataset, containing 27,869 questions derived from the collection of Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) financial regulation documents.<n>We design a baseline Regulatory Information Retrieval and Answer Generation (RIRAG) system and evaluate it with RePASs, a novel evaluation metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T14:44:19Z)
• Alignment Studio: Aligning Large Language Models to Particular Contextual Regulations [61.141986747544024]
  We present an approach that empowers application developers to tune a model to their particular values, social norms, laws and other regulations. We lay out three main components of such an Alignment Studio architecture: Framers, Instructors, and Auditors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T21:26:49Z)
• Policy Architectures for Compositional Generalization in Control [71.61675703776628]
  We introduce a framework for modeling entity-based compositional structure in tasks. Our policies are flexible and can be trained end-to-end without requiring any action primitives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T06:44:24Z)
• Normative Disagreement as a Challenge for Cooperative AI [56.34005280792013]
  We argue that typical cooperation-inducing learning algorithms fail to cooperate in bargaining problems. We develop a class of norm-adaptive policies and show in experiments that these significantly increase cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-27T11:37:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.