"You should see my partners' fingers": A Qualitative Study of Construction Artisans' Perspective on Technical Innovation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20004v1
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:39:58 GMT
- Title: "You should see my partners' fingers": A Qualitative Study of Construction Artisans' Perspective on Technical Innovation
- Abstract summary: We report the themes that emerged from the qualitative analysis of interviews with construction artisans in North-East Italy.<n>The study sheds more light on the articulated view of technological innovation in small enterprises, where there is no distance between investors and users.
- Score: 2.1550839871882017
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Construction industry scholars have advocated increasing digitalization as a harbinger of manifold improvements, from safe training to efficient waste management. Small construction enterprises, which often face greater difficulties in embracing such a paradigm, are frequently overlooked in investigations of stakeholders' views on technical innovation. This study aims to start filling this gap by investigating the views of small construction enterprises on technical innovation. We report the themes that emerged from the qualitative analysis of interviews with construction artisans in North-East Italy in 2018-2019, including installers, restorers, carpenters, painters, and upholsterers (N=25). We asked what makes new technical devices acceptable to them and conducted inductive and deductive thematic analyses to identify recurrent arguments supporting their positions. The analysis identified fifteen premises underlying the interviewees' positions on technical innovation, grouped around four issues: Is technological innovation part of my job? Is the financial cost of innovating worthwhile? Will the new technology be practical? What part of my business is served by communication devices? The study sheds more light on an underrepresented sector and the articulated view of technological innovation in small enterprises, where there is no distance between investors and users. It also adopts a qualitative methodology that can be exported to investigate the acceptability requirements of other samples and specific devices.
Related papers
- From Papers to Progress: Rethinking Knowledge Accumulation in Software Engineering [0.8680081568962996]
We analyze responses from the ICSE 2026 Future of Software Engineering pre-survey.<n>Our analysis reveals a tension between increasing research productivity and the limited mechanisms available for synthesizing results.<n>We argue that addressing these barriers requires rethinking the fundamental properties of research artifacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-17T16:19:54Z) - Marginal Gains or Meaningful Progress? Exploring Tech Tuber Narratives on Annual Smartphone Innovation [0.0]
Smartphone manufacturers continue to release new models annually, yet the pace of meaningful innovation has slowed.<n>This study examines whether such updates deliver tangible user benefits, as perceived by expert reviewers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T21:09:15Z) - The Prompt Engineering Report Distilled: Quick Start Guide for Life Sciences [0.016851255229980582]
This report focuses on 6 core prompt techniques: zero-shot, few-shot approaches, thought generation, ensembling, self-criticism, and decomposition.<n>We provide detailed recommendations for how prompts should and shouldn't be structured.<n>We examine the effectiveness of Deep Research tools across OpenAI, Google, Anthropic and Perplexity platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-14T14:39:35Z) - From Concept to Manufacturing: Evaluating Vision-Language Models for Engineering Design [5.268919870502001]
This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) across a spectrum of engineering design tasks.<n>Specifically in this paper, we assess the capabilities of two VLMs, GPT-4V and LLaVA 1.6 34B, in design tasks such as sketch similarity analysis, CAD generation, topology optimization, manufacturability assessment, and engineering textbook problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-21T15:20:48Z) - Machine Unlearning: A Survey [56.79152190680552]
A special need has arisen where, due to privacy, usability, and/or the right to be forgotten, information about some specific samples needs to be removed from a model, called machine unlearning.
This emerging technology has drawn significant interest from both academics and industry due to its innovation and practicality.
No study has analyzed this complex topic or compared the feasibility of existing unlearning solutions in different kinds of scenarios.
The survey concludes by highlighting some of the outstanding issues with unlearning techniques, along with some feasible directions for new research opportunities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-06T10:18:36Z) - Trustworthy, responsible, ethical AI in manufacturing and supply chains:
synthesis and emerging research questions [59.34177693293227]
We explore the applicability of responsible, ethical, and trustworthy AI within the context of manufacturing.
We then use a broadened adaptation of a machine learning lifecycle to discuss, through the use of illustrative examples, how each step may result in a given AI trustworthiness concern.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T10:43:06Z) - Knowledge-enhanced Neural Machine Reasoning: A Review [67.51157900655207]
We introduce a novel taxonomy that categorizes existing knowledge-enhanced methods into two primary categories and four subcategories.
We elucidate the current application domains and provide insight into promising prospects for future research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-04T04:54:30Z) - Towards a Taxonomy of Industrial Challenges and Enabling Technologies in
Industry 4.0 [0.0]
This article proposes a mixed approach of humanistic and engineering techniques applied to the technological and enterprise fields.
The study's results are represented by a taxonomy in which industrial challenges and I4.0-focused technologies are categorized and connected.
This taxonomy also formed the basis for creating a public web platform where industrial practitioners can identify candidate solutions for an industrial challenge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-29T19:52:36Z) - Foundations and Recent Trends in Multimodal Machine Learning:
Principles, Challenges, and Open Questions [68.6358773622615]
This paper provides an overview of the computational and theoretical foundations of multimodal machine learning.
We propose a taxonomy of 6 core technical challenges: representation, alignment, reasoning, generation, transference, and quantification.
Recent technical achievements will be presented through the lens of this taxonomy, allowing researchers to understand the similarities and differences across new approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-07T19:21:19Z) - Axes for Sociotechnical Inquiry in AI Research [3.0215443986383734]
We propose four directions for inquiry into new and evolving areas of technological development.
The paper provides a lexicon for sociotechnical inquiry and illustrates it through the example of consumer drone technology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-26T16:49:04Z) - Qlib: An AI-oriented Quantitative Investment Platform [86.8580406876954]
AI technologies have raised new challenges to the quantitative investment system.
Qlib aims to realize the potential, empower the research, and create the value of AI technologies in quantitative investment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-22T12:57:10Z) - Data-Driven Aerospace Engineering: Reframing the Industry with Machine
Learning [49.367020832638794]
The aerospace industry is poised to capitalize on big data and machine learning.
Recent trends will be explored in context of critical challenges in design, manufacturing, verification and services.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-24T22:40:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.