CURED: Creating, Understanding, and Repairing Errors Demonstrator

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20140v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:41:17 GMT
• Title: CURED: Creating, Understanding, and Repairing Errors Demonstrator
• Abstract summary: Recent research highlights the potential of statistical learning algorithms for error detection and cleaning.<n>This paper combines our recent work on ML-based data cleaning and error models in a unified demonstrator.
• Score: 0.6198237241838559
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Detecting and cleaning errors in tabular data is a prerequisite for data intense software applications. Recent research at the intersection of Machine Learning (ML) and Database Management Systems (DBMS) highlights the potential of statistical learning algorithms for error detection and cleaning. This paper combines our recent work on ML-based data cleaning and error models in a unified demonstrator. The web application allows users to upload tabular data, perturb the data with realistic data dependent errors and use modern ML methods to clean and understand error mechanisms in data. Our demonstrator helps to bridge the gap between theoretical advancements and intuitive practical insights in the context of error models and data cleaning algorithms for tabular data. The demonstrator is available at https://cured.demo.calgo-lab.de/

Related papers

• Semi-Supervised Learning under General Causal Models [51.90307793476367]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) aims to train a machine learning model using both labelled and unlabelled data.<n>We propose a framework that works with general causal models in which the variables have flexible causal relations.<n>The learned causal generative model can generate synthetic labelled data for training a more accurate predictive model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T07:46:38Z)
• The Right to be Forgotten in Pruning: Unveil Machine Unlearning on Sparse Models [18.728123679646398]
  Machine unlearning aims to efficiently eliminate the memory about deleted data from trained models and address the right to be forgotten.<n>In this paper, we empirically find that the deleted data has an impact on the pruned topology in a sparse model.<n>Motivated by the observation and the right to be forgotten, we define a new terminology un-pruning" to eliminate the impact of deleted data on model pruning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T18:13:26Z)
• Towards Practical Benchmarking of Data Cleaning Techniques: On Generating Authentic Errors via Large Language Models [15.985949745494747]
  TableEG is a framework that leverages large language models to generate authentic errors.<n>We trained on 12 real-world datasets spanning 10 diverse domains.<n>TableEG not only bridges the gap between synthetic and real-world errors but also establishes a robust benchmark for subsequent error detection and correction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T02:58:25Z)
• Hey, That's My Data! Label-Only Dataset Inference in Large Language Models [63.35066172530291]
  CatShift is a label-only dataset-inference framework.<n>It capitalizes on catastrophic forgetting: the tendency of an LLM to overwrite previously learned knowledge when exposed to new data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T13:02:59Z)
• Statistically Testing Training Data for Unwanted Error Patterns using Rule-Oriented Regression [0.5831737970661137]
  We provide a method to test training data for flaws, to establish a trustworthy ground-truth for a subsequent training of machine learning models.<n>Our approach extends the abilities of conventional statistical testing by letting the test-condition'' be any condition to describe a pattern in the data.<n>We provide an open source implementation for demonstration and experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T09:52:36Z)
• Exploring LLM Agents for Cleaning Tabular Machine Learning Datasets [19.844836459291546]
  High-quality, error-free datasets are a key ingredient in building reliable, accurate, and unbiased machine learning (ML) models.<n>However, real world datasets often suffer from errors due to sensor malfunctions, data entry mistakes, or improper data integration across multiple sources.<n>In this study, we investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can help alleviate the burden of manual data cleaning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T15:29:46Z)
• Attribute-to-Delete: Machine Unlearning via Datamodel Matching [65.13151619119782]
  Machine unlearning -- efficiently removing a small "forget set" training data on a pre-divertrained machine learning model -- has recently attracted interest. Recent research shows that machine unlearning techniques do not hold up in such a challenging setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:20:10Z)
• Can LLMs Separate Instructions From Data? And What Do We Even Mean By That? [60.50127555651554]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) show impressive results in numerous practical applications, but they lack essential safety features.<n>This makes them vulnerable to manipulations such as indirect prompt injections and generally unsuitable for safety-critical tasks.<n>We introduce a formal measure for instruction-data separation and an empirical variant that is calculable from a model's outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T15:48:56Z)
• Machine Learning Force Fields with Data Cost Aware Training [94.78998399180519]
  Machine learning force fields (MLFF) have been proposed to accelerate molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. Even for the most data-efficient MLFFs, reaching chemical accuracy can require hundreds of frames of force and energy labels. We propose a multi-stage computational framework -- ASTEROID, which lowers the data cost of MLFFs by leveraging a combination of cheap inaccurate data and expensive accurate data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T04:34:54Z)
• AI Model Disgorgement: Methods and Choices [127.54319351058167]
  We introduce a taxonomy of possible disgorgement methods that are applicable to modern machine learning systems. We investigate the meaning of "removing the effects" of data in the trained model in a way that does not require retraining from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T08:50:18Z)
• Learning Over Dirty Data Without Cleaning [12.892359722606681]
  Real-world datasets are dirty and contain many errors. Learning over dirty databases may result in inaccurate models. We propose DLearn, a novel relational learning system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-05T20:21:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.