Adaptive Confidence-weighted Expansion for Trustworthy Multi-Omics Multimodal Fusion
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20742v1
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:42:16 GMT
- Title: Adaptive Confidence-weighted Expansion for Trustworthy Multi-Omics Multimodal Fusion
- Abstract summary: We introduce Adaptive Confidence-weighted Expansion (ACE) to enhance the trustworthiness of multimodal fusion models.<n>ACE significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art algorithms in both classification performance and confidence calibration.
- Score: 0.8749675983608171
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Multimodal learning is a robust approach to improve predictive performance in applications such as medical prognosis. However, the clinical applicability of models that use multimodal learning is hampered by their poor performance under noisy or uninformative data streams. Present fusion approaches often lack robust mechanisms for the dynamic assessment of data quality and for the provision of a trustable confidence score on the final prediction. This dissuades their deployment in safety-critical settings. To address these limitations, we introduce Adaptive Confidence-weighted Expansion (ACE), a novel framework to enhance the trustworthiness of multimodal fusion models. ACE first enhances the multimodal space by generating new, complementary modalities from intra-modality correlations. It then employs a dual-level confidence mechanism that (1) adaptively reweighs all modalities by their reliability before fusion and (2) estimates a global trust score over the fused, final decision. To evaluate ACE, we used four challenging multi-omics datasets (BRCA, KIPAN, LGG, and ROSMAP). ACE significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art algorithms in both classification performance and confidence calibration. Our framework provides a more stable and robust data fusion method that facilitates the use of multimodal learning in addressing high-stakes problems.
Related papers
- Adaptive Confidence Regularization for Multimodal Failure Detection [21.36399203050946]
We propose Adaptive Confidence Regularization (ACR), a framework specifically designed to detect multimodal failures.<n>Our approach is driven by a key observation: in most failure cases, the confidence of the multimodal prediction is significantly lower than that of at least one unimodal branch.<n>In addition, we propose Multimodal Feature Swapping, a novel outlier technique that generates challenging, failure-aware training examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T18:56:38Z) - Confidence Estimation for LLMs in Multi-turn Interactions [48.081802290688394]
This work presents the first systematic study of confidence estimation in multi-turn interactions.<n>We establish a formal evaluation framework grounded in two key desideratas: per-turn calibration and monotonicity of confidence.<n>Our work provides a foundational methodology for developing more reliable and trustworthy conversational agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-05T14:58:04Z) - Open-World Deepfake Attribution via Confidence-Aware Asymmetric Learning [78.92934995292113]
We propose a Confidence-Aware Asymmetric Learning (CAL) framework, which balances confidence across known and novel forgery types.<n>CAL consistently outperforms previous methods, achieving new state-of-the-art performance on both known and novel forgery attribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-14T12:31:28Z) - Confidence-aware multi-modality learning for eye disease screening [58.861421804458395]
We propose a novel multi-modality evidential fusion pipeline for eye disease screening.
It provides a measure of confidence for each modality and elegantly integrates the multi-modality information.
Experimental results on both public and internal datasets demonstrate that our model excels in robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T13:27:30Z) - Calibrating Multimodal Learning [94.65232214643436]
We propose a novel regularization technique, i.e., Calibrating Multimodal Learning (CML) regularization, to calibrate the predictive confidence of previous methods.
This technique could be flexibly equipped by existing models and improve the performance in terms of confidence calibration, classification accuracy, and model robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-02T04:29:57Z) - Trustworthy Multimodal Regression with Mixture of Normal-inverse Gamma
Distributions [91.63716984911278]
We introduce a novel Mixture of Normal-Inverse Gamma distributions (MoNIG) algorithm, which efficiently estimates uncertainty in principle for adaptive integration of different modalities and produces a trustworthy regression result.
Experimental results on both synthetic and different real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness and trustworthiness of our method on various multimodal regression tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-11T14:28:12Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Boosted Ensembling in Multi-Modal Settings [33.25969141014772]
Uncertainty estimation is a widely researched method to highlight the confidence of machine learning systems in deployment.
Sequential and parallel ensemble techniques have shown improved performance of ML systems in multi-modal settings.
We propose an uncertainty-aware boosting technique for multi-modal ensembling in order to focus on the data points with higher associated uncertainty estimates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-21T18:28:13Z) - Providing reliability in Recommender Systems through Bernoulli Matrix
Factorization [63.732639864601914]
This paper proposes Bernoulli Matrix Factorization (BeMF) to provide both prediction values and reliability values.
BeMF acts on model-based collaborative filtering rather than on memory-based filtering.
The more reliable a prediction is, the less liable it is to be wrong.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-05T14:24:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.