Dysphagia Risk Stratification in Head and Neck Cancer via Two-Stage PRO-Clinical Stacking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22514v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:34:26 GMT
• Title: Dysphagia Risk Stratification in Head and Neck Cancer via Two-Stage PRO-Clinical Stacking
• Abstract summary: Dysphagia is a debilitating late effect of head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment, yet timely identification of at-risk patients remains challenging.<n>Definitive assessment relies on videofluoroscopic imaging, which requires specialized equipment, trained personnel, and significant patient burden.<n>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are low-cost, scalable, and easily collected at any clinical encounter.
• Score: 13.262516787411487
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Dysphagia is a debilitating late effect of head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment, yet timely identification of at-risk patients remains challenging in survivorship care. Definitive assessment relies on videofluoroscopic imaging, as captured by the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (CTCAE-DIGEST), which, while validated, requires specialized equipment, trained personnel, and significant patient burden, limiting its routine use in surveillance. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), by contrast, are low-cost, scalable, and easily collected at any clinical encounter, making them an attractive alternative signal for identifying patients who may warrant further evaluation. However, a clear clinical framework for translating PRO responses into actionable interventions is still evolving. In particular, uncertainty remains regarding when a patient's self-reported symptom burden should prompt escalation of care. This study addresses this gap by formulating a single-visit PRO-clinical prediction framework and introducing a clinically interpretable two-stage stacking model to predict swallowing impairment risk using PRO responses and structured clinical variables, without requiring videofluoroscopic imaging. The proposed framework quantifies the independent contributions of patient-reported symptoms and clinical factors within a unified and interpretable risk assessment model. Our findings demonstrate that individual MDADI responses contain predictive information beyond that captured by composite or global summary scores, while interpretability analyses reveal symptom patterns and clinical risk factors associated with swallowing impairment. Together, these results support the use of structured PRO-clinical integration as a practical, imaging-free approach for dysphagia risk stratification in HNC survivorship.

Related papers

• From Static Risk to Dynamic Trajectories: Toward World-Model-Inspired Clinical Prediction [61.12883122613684]
  This Review focuses on intervention-aware disease trajectory modeling in clinical AI--methods estimating patient-specific longitudinal disease evolution and assessing trajectory changes under alternative treatments.<n>We organize the field around six linked components: three decision tasks (factual forecasting, counterfactual estimation, policy evaluation) and three data-generating mechanisms (disease evolution, treatment assignment, observation process) that determine identifiability.<n>We present the first unified framework bridging forecasting, counterfactual trajectories, and policy evaluation across discrete/continuous time, explicitly addressing treatment assignment, time-varying confounding, and observation bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-16T10:45:26Z)
• RAG4Outcome: A Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Framework for Prognostic Prediction in Chronic Osteomyelitis [8.12645396241252]
  RAG4Outcome is a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework for prognostic prediction in chronic osteomyelitis.<n>Our method integrates multimodal clinical data, including PET-CT imaging reports, structured surgical and diagnostic records, and unstructured follow-up notes, into a unified prediction pipeline.<n>Preliminary results on real-world cases demonstrate promising effectiveness and clinical alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T19:33:54Z)
• Reliability Auditing for Downstream LLM tasks in Psychiatry: LLM-Generated Hospitalization Risk Scores [5.004814662623874]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in clinical reasoning and risk assessment.<n>However, their interpretive reliability in critical and indeterminate domains such as psychiatry remains unclear.<n>We propose an approach for reliability auditing downstream LLM tasks by structuring evaluation around the impact of prompt design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-23T20:42:22Z)
• CURA: Clinical Uncertainty Risk Alignment for Language Model-Based Risk Prediction [10.129412789850239]
  We propose a framework that aligns clinical LM-based risk estimates and uncertainty with both individual error likelihoods and cohort-level ambiguities.<n>Experiments on MIMIC-IV clinical risk prediction tasks show that CURA consistently improves calibration metrics without substantially compromising discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T05:58:37Z)
• Beyond Prompt: Fine-grained Simulation of Cognitively Impaired Standardized Patients via Stochastic Steering [58.85421622061983]
  We propose StsPatient for the fine-grained simulation of cognitively impaired patients.<n>We capture domain-specific features by extracting steering vectors from contrastive pairs of instructions and responses.<n>StsPatient significantly outperforms baselines in both clinical authenticity and severity controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T02:37:46Z)
• AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
  We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z)
• Unsupervised risk factor identification across cancer types and data modalities via explainable artificial intelligence [0.0]
  We present a novel method for unsupervised machine learning that directly optimize for survival heterogeneity across patient clusters.<n>Our approach represents novel methodology for training any neural network architecture on any data modality to identify prognostically distinct patient groups.<n>This pan-cancer, model-agnostic approach represents a valuable advancement in clinical risk stratification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-15T19:11:10Z)
• Adaptable Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction from Heterogeneous Data using Large Language Models [70.64969663547703]
  AdaCVD is an adaptable CVD risk prediction framework built on large language models extensively fine-tuned on over half a million participants from the UK Biobank.<n>It addresses key clinical challenges across three dimensions: it flexibly incorporates comprehensive yet variable patient information; it seamlessly integrates both structured data and unstructured text; and it rapidly adapts to new patient populations using minimal additional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T14:42:02Z)
• Attention-enabled Explainable AI for Bladder Cancer Recurrence Prediction [0.4369058206183195]
  Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrence rates soar as high as 70-80%.<n>Each recurrence triggers a cascade of invasive procedures, lifelong surveillance, and escalating healthcare costs.<n>Existing clinical prediction tools remain fundamentally flawed, often overestimating recurrence risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T20:39:33Z)
• Penalized Deep Partially Linear Cox Models with Application to CT Scans of Lung Cancer Patients [42.09584755334577]
  Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality globally, highlighting the importance of understanding its mortality risks to design effective therapies. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) employed computed tomography texture analysis to quantify the mortality risks of lung cancer patients. We propose a novel Penalized Deep Partially Linear Cox Model (Penalized DPLC), which incorporates the SCAD penalty to select important texture features and employs a deep neural network to estimate the nonparametric component of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T15:38:16Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)
• MIA-Prognosis: A Deep Learning Framework to Predict Therapy Response [58.0291320452122]
  This paper aims at a unified deep learning approach to predict patient prognosis and therapy response. We formalize the prognosis modeling as a multi-modal asynchronous time series classification task. Our predictive model could further stratify low-risk and high-risk patients in terms of long-term survival.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T15:30:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.