Just Testing, Move Along: Evasion of LLM-based System Log Interpretation by Prompt Injection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24174v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:59:00 GMT
• Title: Just Testing, Move Along: Evasion of LLM-based System Log Interpretation by Prompt Injection
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a framework for evaluating prompt injection attacks against large language models (LLMs) based on system logs.<n>Using log traces generated during real cyber attacks, our approach creates adversarial examples through generic injection generation, refinement, and attack-specific optimization.<n>Our evaluation shows that these injections can cause malicious log traces to be classified as benign despite containing clear indicators of compromise.
• Score: 2.900900313242943
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into Security Operations Center (SOC) workflows, where they support analysts in tasks such as the interpretation of system logs. However, the ability of LLMs to directly process untrusted textual input also introduces new attack surfaces. In particular, attackers can inject contextual information or explicit instructions into log entries in order to influence how malicious activity is interpreted by the model. Despite the growing adoption of LLMs for log analytics, the robustness of such systems against adversarial log injection remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, this paper presents a framework for evaluating prompt injection attacks against LLM-based log interpretation. Using log traces generated during real cyber attacks, our approach creates adversarial examples through generic injection generation, refinement, and attack-specific optimization. Our evaluation across multiple state-of-the-art LLMs shows that these injections can cause malicious log traces to be classified as benign despite containing clear indicators of compromise. As a potential remedy, we show that the explanations generated by the LLMs alongside their classifications frequently contain indicators of adversarial manipulation that can be leveraged to detect such attacks.

Related papers

• Beyond Over-Refusal: Defending Indirect Prompt Injection via Latent Instruction Manifolds [46.845766815799585]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been integrated into complex ecosystems.<n>LLMs can separate instruction from data intrinsically with both theoretical and empirical evidence.<n>We propose AEGIS (Adaptive Ensemble Guard for Injection Shielding)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-23T07:12:33Z)
• Context Contamination in LLM Analysis of Network Security Logs: Poison with Passive Prompt Injection and Mitigation Evaluation [8.339789704552706]
  Large Language Models are increasingly deployed in Security Operations Centers for log analysis tasks.<n>We demonstrate that adversaries can embed prompt injection payloads in log-generating fields that persist in storage.<n>We present LogInject, a systematic framework for evaluating these threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-16T02:15:35Z)
• AdversarialCoT: Single-Document Retrieval Poisoning for LLM Reasoning [115.3243260783674]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language model (LLM) reasoning by retrieving external documents.<n>We study knowledge-base poisoning attacks in RAG, where an attacker injects malicious content into the retrieval corpus.<n>We propose AdversarialCoT, a query-specific attack that poisons only a single document in the corpus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T02:10:23Z)
• Defending against Indirect Prompt Injection by Instruction Detection [109.30156975159561]
  InstructDetector is a novel detection-based approach that leverages the behavioral states of LLMs to identify potential IPI attacks.<n>InstructDetector achieves a detection accuracy of 99.60% in the in-domain setting and 96.90% in the out-of-domain setting, and reduces the attack success rate to just 0.03% on the BIPIA benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T13:04:45Z)
• Robustness via Referencing: Defending against Prompt Injection Attacks by Referencing the Executed Instruction [68.6543680065379]
  Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks.<n>We propose a novel defense method that leverages, rather than suppresses, the instruction-following abilities of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T07:13:53Z)
• Towards More Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Evaluating RAG Under Adversarial Poisoning Attacks [45.07581174558107]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have emerged as a promising solution to mitigate hallucinations.<n>RAG systems are vulnerable to adversarial poisoning attacks, where malicious passages injected into the retrieval corpus can mislead models into producing factually incorrect outputs.<n>We present a rigorously controlled empirical study of how RAG systems behave under such attacks and how their robustness can be improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-21T17:31:52Z)
• Attention Tracker: Detecting Prompt Injection Attacks in LLMs [62.247841717696765]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various domains but remain vulnerable to prompt injection attacks.<n>We introduce the concept of the distraction effect, where specific attention heads shift focus from the original instruction to the injected instruction.<n>We propose Attention Tracker, a training-free detection method that tracks attention patterns on instruction to detect prompt injection attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T04:05:59Z)
• Human-Interpretable Adversarial Prompt Attack on Large Language Models with Situational Context [49.13497493053742]
  This research explores converting a nonsensical suffix attack into a sensible prompt via a situation-driven contextual re-writing. We combine an independent, meaningful adversarial insertion and situations derived from movies to check if this can trick an LLM. Our approach demonstrates that a successful situation-driven attack can be executed on both open-source and proprietary LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T19:47:26Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
  We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities.<n>Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content.<n>We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
• Hijacking Large Language Models via Adversarial In-Context Learning [10.416972293173993]
  In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm leveraging LLMs for specific downstream tasks by utilizing labeled examples as demonstrations (demos) in the preconditioned prompts.<n>Existing attacks are either easy to detect, require a trigger in user input, or lack specificity towards ICL.<n>This work introduces a novel transferable prompt injection attack against ICL, aiming to hijack LLMs to generate the target output or elicit harmful responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T15:01:48Z)
• Evaluating the Instruction-Following Robustness of Large Language Models to Prompt Injection [70.28425745910711]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional proficiency in instruction-following. This capability brings with it the risk of prompt injection attacks. We evaluate the robustness of instruction-following LLMs against such attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T06:21:50Z)
• Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection [64.67495502772866]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being integrated into various applications. We show how attackers can override original instructions and employed controls using Prompt Injection attacks. We derive a comprehensive taxonomy from a computer security perspective to systematically investigate impacts and vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T17:14:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.