Estimating Treatment Effects for Depression in Longitudinal Therapy Switching Settings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27214v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 01:31:14 GMT
• Title: Estimating Treatment Effects for Depression in Longitudinal Therapy Switching Settings
• Abstract summary: We use a proprietary longitudinal major depressive disorder (MDD) clinical trial dataset to estimate Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) total scores under alternative treatments.<n>We benchmark 8 estimators, including meta-learners, residual-based methods, and tree-based approaches.<n>Our analysis shows that symptom benefits concentrate in specific switch directions, with dose intensification being generally beneficial.
• Score: 34.84491887827619
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Depression treatment often requires switching medications due to inadequate response or adverse effects. Estimating individualized treatment effects in this setting is challenging because treatment assignment is confounded by patient characteristics, switching induces time-varying selection, and counterfactual outcomes are not observed in follow-up data. Using a proprietary longitudinal major depressive disorder (MDD) clinical trial dataset, we formulate a next-visit counterfactual prediction task to estimate Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) total scores under alternative treatments. We benchmark 8 estimators, including meta-learners, residual-based methods, and tree-based approaches. Causal Forest (CF) demonstrates the most favorable and consistent performance across all criteria. Our analysis shows that symptom benefits concentrate in specific switch directions, with dose intensification being generally beneficial. Notably, we identify a counterintuitive exception where a lower-intensity regimen outperforms a higher-intensity alternative for specific patient subsets. While crude observational comparisons substantially overstate gains, confounding-adjusted estimates yield modest, actionable magnitudes. These findings provide prospectively testable candidates for clinical decision support in depression care.

Related papers

• Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with survival outcomes via a deep survival learner [5.540352966241158]
  Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects in survival settings is complicated by right censoring and the time-varying nature of the estimand.<n>We propose a deep survival learner for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with right-censored outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T01:11:44Z)
• Assessing the robustness of heterogeneous treatment effects in survival analysis under informative censoring [50.164756034797136]
  Dropout is common in clinical studies, with up to half of patients leaving early due to side effects or other reasons.<n>When dropout is informative, it introduces censoring bias, because of which treatment effect estimates are also biased.<n>We propose an assumption-lean framework to assess the robustness of conditional average treatment effect estimates in survival analysis when facing censoring bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T10:51:17Z)
• Beyond the ATE: Interpretable Modelling of Treatment Effects over Dose and Time [46.2482873419289]
  We propose a framework for modelling treatment effect trajectories as smooth surfaces over dose and time.<n>Our approach decouples the estimation of trajectory shape from the specification of clinically relevant properties.<n>We show that our method yields accurate, interpretable, and editable models of treatment dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T20:33:33Z)
• Learning Causally Predictable Outcomes from Psychiatric Longitudinal Data [6.09170287691728]
  Causal inference in longitudinal biomedical data remains a central challenge.<n>Our algorithm learns non-negative, clinically interpretable weights for outcome aggregation.<n>Our algorithm consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in recovering causal effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T21:56:30Z)
• Are causal effect estimations enough for optimal recommendations under multitreatment scenarios? [2.4578723416255754]
  It is essential to include a causal effect estimation analysis to compare potential outcomes under different treatments or controls. We propose a comprehensive methodology for multitreatment selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T16:37:35Z)
• Estimating Long-term Heterogeneous Dose-response Curve: Generalization Bound Leveraging Optimal Transport Weights [54.65531750162626]
  Long-term treatment effect estimation is a significant but challenging problem in many applications.<n>Existing methods rely on ideal assumptions, such as no unobserved confounders or binary treatment, to estimate long-term average treatment effects.<n>We introduce an optimal transport weighting framework to align the long-term observational data to an auxiliary short-term experimental data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T14:13:46Z)
• Dynamic Local Average Treatment Effects [19.014535120129338]
  We consider Dynamic Treatment Regimes (DTRs) with One Sided Noncompliance in digital recommendations and adaptive medical trials.<n>We provide nonparametric identification, estimation, and inference for Dynamic Local Average Treatment Effects (LATEs)<n>We show that the assumptions are sufficient to identify Dynamic LATEs for treating in multiple time periods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T16:52:09Z)
• TCFimt: Temporal Counterfactual Forecasting from Individual Multiple Treatment Perspective [50.675845725806724]
  We propose a comprehensive framework of temporal counterfactual forecasting from an individual multiple treatment perspective (TCFimt) TCFimt constructs adversarial tasks in a seq2seq framework to alleviate selection and time-varying bias and designs a contrastive learning-based block to decouple a mixed treatment effect into separated main treatment effects and causal interactions. The proposed method shows satisfactory performance in predicting future outcomes with specific treatments and in choosing optimal treatment type and timing than state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-17T15:01:05Z)
• BITES: Balanced Individual Treatment Effect for Survival data [0.0]
  Estimating the effects of interventions on patient outcome is one of the key aspects of personalized medicine. Time-to-event data is rarely used for treatment optimization. We suggest an approach named BITES, which combines a treatment-specific semi-parametric Cox loss with a treatment-balanced deep neural network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-05T10:39:31Z)
• Deep Multi-task Learning for Depression Detection and Prediction in Longitudinal Data [50.02223091927777]
  Depression is among the most prevalent mental disorders, affecting millions of people of all ages globally. Machine learning techniques have shown effective in enabling automated detection and prediction of depression for early intervention and treatment. We introduce a novel deep multi-task recurrent neural network to tackle this challenge, in which depression classification is jointly optimized with two auxiliary tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-05T05:14:14Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.