FairDiffuseVQVAE: Sampling-Time Fairness in Tabular Diffusion via Conditional Refinement of Vector-Quantized Latents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28945v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 01:57:07 GMT
• Title: FairDiffuseVQVAE: Sampling-Time Fairness in Tabular Diffusion via Conditional Refinement of Vector-Quantized Latents
• Abstract summary: We introduce FairDiffuseVQVAE, a two-stage architecture that decouples fidelity from fairness.<n>Fairness emerges as a property of the sampling distribution.<n>On the Adult, Bank and COMPAS datasets, FairDiffuseVQVAE achieves the highest mean Demographic Parity Ratio.
• Score: 1.6444986611654075
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Synthetic tabular data is increasingly used in privacy-preserving data sharing, data augmentation, and to mitigate downstream classifier bias. State-of-the-art tabular diffusion models such as TabDDPM and TabSyn achieve excellent distributional fidelity but offer no mechanism for fairness; conversely, fairness-aware tabular generators (DECAF, FairTGAN, FairTabDDPM) impose explicit fairness penalties at training time, yielding modest fairness gains at substantial cost to either sample quality or downstream utility. We introduce FairDiffuseVQVAE, a two-stage architecture that decouples fidelity from fairness: a vector-quantized autoencoder with a row-level discriminator (Stage~1, no fairness terms) is followed by a DiffuseVAE-style continuous diffusion refiner that conditions on both the Stage-1 reconstruction and the protected attribute via classifier-free guidance (Stage~2). Fairness emerges as a property of the sampling distribution -- uniform sampling of the protected attribute at inference time enforces demographic parity by construction, rather than from competing loss terms. On the Adult, Bank and COMPAS datasets, FairDiffuseVQVAE achieves the highest mean Demographic Parity Ratio ($0.702$, $+47\%$ over FairTabDDPM) and Equalized Odds Ratio ($0.686$, $+100\%$). It also attains the lowest mean pair-wise correlation error ($0.034$) of any published method, while explicitly trading $\sim$$15$ AUC points for these fairness gains.

Related papers

• Functional Bilevel Optimization for Predictive Fairness [25.649081304879218]
  We consider mean demographic parity through DPVar, the variance of the conditional-mean prediction given the sensitive attribute, and show that optimizing it yields a functional bilevel problem.<n>We propose two algorithms for this problem: FBO, which uses a closed-form adjoint we derive for the squared-loss case to obtain an exact hypergradient, and ITD, which differentiates through unrolled inner steps and extends beyond squared loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-06T13:56:16Z)
• Fair Finetuning Mitigates Distribution Inference Attacks [0.609170287691728]
  Machine learning models trained on sensitive data can inadvertently leak population-level information about their training distributions.<n>We propose Fair Fine-tuning (FFt): a trained model is fine-tuned on samples from a complementary distribution under an Equalized Odds constraint.<n>Our work provides the first formal bound connecting a model's measured EO disparity directly to its adversarial advantage in the DIA game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T05:34:19Z)
• Post-hoc Provider Fairness Adaptation via Hierarchical Exposure Alignment [54.58748721533078]
  Post-hoc Fairness Adaptation (PFA) is a lightweight framework that equips a frozen recommender with a fairness adapter.<n>It learns personalized additive score adjustments from user-item embeddings to steer provider exposure toward fairness.<n>PFA achieves substantial fairness gains with negligible accuracy loss, consistently outperforming strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T16:32:52Z)
• Learning Fairer Representations with FairVIC [1.4018975578160686]
  Mitigating bias in automated decision-making systems is a critical challenge due to nuanced definitions of fairness and dataset-specific biases.<n>We introduce FairVIC, an innovative approach that enhances fairness in neural networks by integrating variance, invariance, and covariance terms into the loss function during training.<n>We evaluate FairVIC against comparable bias mitigation techniques on benchmark datasets, considering both group and individual fairness, and conduct an ablation study on the accuracy-fairness trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T10:10:21Z)
• FairDP: Certified Fairness with Differential Privacy [55.51579601325759]
  This paper introduces FairDP, a novel training mechanism designed to provide group fairness certification for the trained model's decisions.<n>The key idea of FairDP is to train models for distinct individual groups independently, add noise to each group's gradient for data privacy protection, and integrate knowledge from group models to formulate a model that balances privacy, utility, and fairness in downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T21:07:20Z)
• Fair-CDA: Continuous and Directional Augmentation for Group Fairness [48.84385689186208]
  We propose a fine-grained data augmentation strategy for imposing fairness constraints. We show that group fairness can be achieved by regularizing the models on transition paths of sensitive features between groups. Our proposed method does not assume any data generative model and ensures good generalization for both accuracy and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-01T11:23:00Z)
• Chasing Fairness Under Distribution Shift: A Model Weight Perturbation Approach [72.19525160912943]
  We first theoretically demonstrate the inherent connection between distribution shift, data perturbation, and model weight perturbation. We then analyze the sufficient conditions to guarantee fairness for the target dataset. Motivated by these sufficient conditions, we propose robust fairness regularization (RFR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T17:19:23Z)
• On Comparing Fair Classifiers under Data Bias [42.43344286660331]
  We study the effect of varying data biases on the accuracy and fairness of fair classifiers. Our experiments show how to integrate a measure of data bias risk in the existing fairness dashboards for real-world deployments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-12T13:04:46Z)
• Breaking the Spurious Causality of Conditional Generation via Fairness Intervention with Corrective Sampling [77.15766509677348]
  Conditional generative models often inherit spurious correlations from the training dataset. This can result in label-conditional distributions that are imbalanced with respect to another latent attribute. We propose a general two-step strategy to mitigate this issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T08:09:33Z)
• How Robust is Your Fairness? Evaluating and Sustaining Fairness under Unseen Distribution Shifts [107.72786199113183]
  We propose a novel fairness learning method termed CUrvature MAtching (CUMA) CUMA achieves robust fairness generalizable to unseen domains with unknown distributional shifts. We evaluate our method on three popular fairness datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T02:37:50Z)
• Optimal Transport of Binary Classifiers to Fairness [16.588468396705366]
  We show that Optimal Transport to Fairness (OTF) can be used to achieve an effective trade-off between predictive power and fairness. Experiments show that OTF can be used to achieve an effective trade-off between predictive power and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T12:16:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.