ShielDroid: A Hybrid Approach Integrating Machine and Deep Learning for Android Malware Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03250v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:21:51 GMT
• Title: ShielDroid: A Hybrid Approach Integrating Machine and Deep Learning for Android Malware Detection
• Abstract summary: This study presents a real-time Android malware detection framework that analyzes application behavior to accurately identify and classify complex malware.<n>The proposed framework can enhance mobile device security by enabling timely detection of malicious applications and reducing the risk of cyberattacks.
• Score: 0.07817813851272346
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rapid advancement of modern technology has led to a significant increase in the use of smart devices, such as smartphones and tablets, resulting in the widespread adoption of mobile applications. Although applications are required to undergo malware screening before being published on official app stores, many malicious applications successfully evade detection by concealing sophisticated malware variants. These malicious behaviors are often activated only during runtime, making them difficult to identify through conventional static analysis. As a result, malware may remain undetected until after installation, potentially causing irreversible damage to users and their devices. This study presents a real-time Android malware detection framework that analyzes application behavior to accurately identify and classify complex malware. The proposed approach employs a hybrid dynamic analysis technique to distinguish malicious applications from benign ones. After preprocessing and filtering the collected dataset, the applications are classified using multiple machine learning algorithms. A comprehensive performance evaluation is conducted to compare the effectiveness of different classification techniques in terms of detection accuracy and execution time. Experimental results demonstrate that a hybrid model combining Random Forest and a Multilayer Perceptron achieves the best overall performance, attaining an accuracy of 97.5% with an execution time of 22.945 seconds. The proposed framework can enhance mobile device security by enabling timely detection of malicious applications and reducing the risk of cyberattacks.

Related papers

• Empirical Evaluation of SMOTE in Android Malware Detection with Machine Learning: Challenges and Performance in CICMalDroid 2020 [0.0]
  This work tests Machine Learning algorithms in detecting malicious code from dynamic execution characteristics.<n>In 75% of the tested configurations, the application of SMOTE led to performance degradation or only marginal improvements.<n>Tree-based algorithms, such as XGBoost and Random Forest, consistently outperformed the others, achieving weighted recall above 94%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T14:47:47Z)
• Certifiably robust malware detectors by design [48.367676529300276]
  We propose a new model architecture for robust malware detection by design.<n>We show that every robust detector can be decomposed into a specific structure, which can be applied to learn empirically robust malware detectors.<n>Our framework ERDALT is based on this structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T09:19:29Z)
• MASKDROID: Robust Android Malware Detection with Masked Graph Representations [56.09270390096083]
  We propose MASKDROID, a powerful detector with a strong discriminative ability to identify malware. We introduce a masking mechanism into the Graph Neural Network based framework, forcing MASKDROID to recover the whole input graph. This strategy enables the model to understand the malicious semantics and learn more stable representations, enhancing its robustness against adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T07:22:47Z)
• ActDroid: An active learning framework for Android malware detection [3.195234044113248]
  A new piece of malware appears online every 12 seconds. Online learning can be used to mitigate the problem of labelling applications. Our framework achieves accuracies of up to 96%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T13:10:33Z)
• Android Malware Detection with Unbiased Confidence Guarantees [1.6432632226868131]
  We propose a machine learning dynamic analysis approach that provides provably valid confidence guarantees in each malware detection. The proposed approach is based on a novel machine learning framework, called Conformal Prediction, combined with a random forests classifier. We examine its performance on a large-scale dataset collected by installing 1866 malicious and 4816 benign applications on a real android device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T11:07:31Z)
• Enhancing Enterprise Network Security: Comparing Machine-Level and Process-Level Analysis for Dynamic Malware Detection [2.812395851874055]
  Dynamic analysis can overcome evasion techniques commonly used to bypass static analysis. A malicious machine does not necessarily mean all running processes on the machine are also malicious. The existence of background applications decreases previous state-of-the-art accuracy by about 20.12% on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T14:17:35Z)
• Overload: Latency Attacks on Object Detection for Edge Devices [47.9744734181236]
  This paper investigates latency attacks on deep learning applications. Unlike common adversarial attacks for misclassification, the goal of latency attacks is to increase the inference time. We use object detection to demonstrate how such kind of attacks work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-11T17:24:31Z)
• DRSM: De-Randomized Smoothing on Malware Classifier Providing Certified Robustness [58.23214712926585]
  We develop a certified defense, DRSM (De-Randomized Smoothed MalConv), by redesigning the de-randomized smoothing technique for the domain of malware detection. Specifically, we propose a window ablation scheme to provably limit the impact of adversarial bytes while maximally preserving local structures of the executables. We are the first to offer certified robustness in the realm of static detection of malware executables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T17:25:22Z)
• Towards a Fair Comparison and Realistic Design and Evaluation Framework of Android Malware Detectors [63.75363908696257]
  We analyze 10 influential research works on Android malware detection using a common evaluation framework. We identify five factors that, if not taken into account when creating datasets and designing detectors, significantly affect the trained ML models. We conclude that the studied ML-based detectors have been evaluated optimistically, which justifies the good published results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T08:28:08Z)
• Mate! Are You Really Aware? An Explainability-Guided Testing Framework for Robustness of Malware Detectors [49.34155921877441]
  We propose an explainability-guided and model-agnostic testing framework for robustness of malware detectors. We then use this framework to test several state-of-the-art malware detectors' abilities to detect manipulated malware. Our findings shed light on the limitations of current malware detectors, as well as how they can be improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T08:02:38Z)
• EvadeDroid: A Practical Evasion Attack on Machine Learning for Black-box Android Malware Detection [2.2811510666857546]
  EvadeDroid is a problem-space adversarial attack designed to effectively evade black-box Android malware detectors in real-world scenarios. We show that EvadeDroid achieves evasion rates of 80%-95% against DREBIN, Sec-SVM, ADE-MA, MaMaDroid, and Opcode-SVM with only 1-9 queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T09:39:40Z)
• Adversarial EXEmples: A Survey and Experimental Evaluation of Practical Attacks on Machine Learning for Windows Malware Detection [67.53296659361598]
  adversarial EXEmples can bypass machine learning-based detection by perturbing relatively few input bytes. We develop a unifying framework that does not only encompass and generalize previous attacks against machine-learning models, but also includes three novel attacks. These attacks, named Full DOS, Extend and Shift, inject the adversarial payload by respectively manipulating the DOS header, extending it, and shifting the content of the first section.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T07:16:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.