A Unified Issue Resolution Benchmark for Requirement Clarification, Planning, and Code Generation for Coding Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09072v1
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 03:22:04 GMT
- Title: A Unified Issue Resolution Benchmark for Requirement Clarification, Planning, and Code Generation for Coding Agents
- Abstract summary: SWE-RPG is a repository-level benchmark that combines executable patch evaluation with validated ground-truth references.<n>SWE-RPG comprises 163 tasks from 31 Python and Java repositories, including 113 bug fixes and 50 feature additions.<n>We evaluate 3 coding agents, including Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode, with 6 large language model backends.
- Score: 16.4855244145731
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language model-powered coding agents are increasingly used to modify existing code repositories, for example, by adding features or fixing bugs. Yet existing repository-level benchmarks typically evaluate only whether the final patch passes tests. Satisfying a user request requires a long chain of interdependent reasoning and decisions: an agent must recover explicit and implicit requirements, formulate a repository-grounded implementation plan, and translate it into correct code. A pass/fail outcome cannot characterize how an unsuccessful trajectory diverges from the requirements and implementation process needed for a correct patch. To address this gap, we introduce SWE-RPG, a repository-level benchmark that combines executable patch evaluation with validated ground-truth references (GTs) for (1) Requirement Clarification and (2) Implementation Planning. These intermediate GTs support retrospective, GT-aligned diagnosis of complete coding-agent trajectories across clarification, planning, code generation, and artifact submission. SWE-RPG comprises 163 tasks from 31 Python and Java repositories, including 113 bug fixes and 50 feature additions. We evaluate 3 coding agents, including Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode, with 6 large language model backends, including Claude-Sonnet-5 and GPT-5.6-Terra. Results show that the evaluated popular coding agents still struggle to implement user requests in existing repositories, achieving an average resolved rate of only 31.5% on SWE-RPG. Intermediate-GT diagnosis further identifies implicit requirement recovery as the main bottleneck, accounting for 24.5%--46.0% of agent runs. This result suggests implicit-requirement recovery as a key candidate direction for improving coding agents. The benchmark data and evaluation code are available at https://github.com/Xin-Zhou-smu/SWE-RPG-Bench.
Related papers
- SWE-Gate: Passing Functional Tests Is Not Enough for Software Engineering Agents [63.65682461568621]
We introduce SWE-Gate, a repository-level benchmark for software engineering agents that explicitly evaluates review constraint compliance alongside functional correctness.<n>SWE-Gate derives review constraints from real pull request review comments and synthesizes repository-level repair instances around these constraints.<n>Each instance provides separate functional and constraint tests, together with non-compliant and gold patches, enabling explicit separation between issue resolution capability and review constraint compliance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-03T17:53:34Z) - Adaptive Critical Token-Aware Retrieval for Repository-Level Code Generation [53.85136813868056]
ACToR is an adaptive critical token-aware retrieval framework for repository-level code generation.<n>We show that ACToR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods on repository-level benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-01T17:59:39Z) - SpecPath: Testing Coding Agents Across Contract-Equivalent Specification Histories [13.437222222971272]
We identify specification-path sensitivity, a failure mode in which requirement histories that are equivalent in their final meaning lead the same agent system to produce behaviorally different programs.<n>We introduce SpecPath, a diagnostic evaluation that holds the repository, final contract, verifier, agent system, and execution budget fixed while changing only the revision path that leads to the contract.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-10T16:19:00Z) - Fantastic Adaptive Taxonomies and How to Use Them [100.20614173157708]
AdaMAST converts execution traces into a compact, evidence-grounded failure taxonomy.<n>No code is hand-authored, no trace human-annotated.<n>In agent-system search, taxonomy-coded diagnoses of failed candidates outperform free-form.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-17T17:41:16Z) - VeriEvol: Scaling Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning via Verifiable Evol-Instruct [71.22358682581215]
Scaling reinforcement learning for visual mathematical reasoning requires more than generating harder questions.<n>We instantiate this as VeriEvol, an iterative framework with two components.<n>On a five-benchmark visual-math suite, scaling evolved SFT data from 10K to 250K samples raises the mean accuracy from 35.42 to 54.73.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-22T16:17:30Z) - Automating Formal Verification with Agent-Guided Tree Search [0.0]
Formal verification offers a path to provably correct software, but writing verified code remains expensive enough that the technique is rarely used in production.<n>Recent benchmarks measure their ability to translate specifications into code and machine-checked iteration of correctness.<n>This thesis evaluates the state of such LLM-driven verified-code generation in Lean and develops search-based methods for improving performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T14:50:47Z) - BLAgent: Agentic RAG for File-Level Bug Localization [2.2917707112773593]
BLAgent is a novel agentic RAG framework for file-level bug localization.<n> BLAgent attains over 78% Top-1 accuracy with open-source models.<n> BLAgent improves end-to-end repair success by over 20%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-18T07:20:13Z) - Beyond Isolated Tasks: A Framework for Evaluating Coding Agents on Sequential Software Evolution [5.10403054516716]
Existing datasets evaluate performance on isolated, single pull request (PR) tasks in a stateless manner.<n>We introduce an automated coding task generation framework, which helps generate our dataset SWE-STEPS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-03T13:44:40Z) - SlopCodeBench: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Degrade Over Long-Horizon Iterative Tasks [55.76734816061826]
We introduce SlopCodeBench, a language-agnostic benchmark comprising 20 problems and 93 checkpoints.<n>We track two trajectory-level quality signals: verbosity, the fraction of redundant or duplicated code, and structural erosion.<n>No agent solves any problem end-to-end across 11 models; the highest checkpoint solve rate is 17.2%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-25T19:26:44Z) - TRAJEVAL: Decomposing Code Agent Trajectories for Fine-Grained Diagnosis [23.834704102474927]
Code agents can resolve GitHub issues, yet when they fail, current evaluation provides no visibility into where or why.<n>We introduce TRAJEVAL, a diagnostic framework that decomposes agent trajectories into three interpretable stages.<n>We validate that these diagnostics are predictive, achieving model-level Pass@1 prediction within 0.87-2.1% MAE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-25T05:27:03Z) - SPARC: Scenario Planning and Reasoning for Automated C Unit Test Generation [1.0010193170880752]
We introduce a neuro-symbolic, scenario-based framework that bridges the gap between high-level program intent and the rigid syntactic constraints of pointer arithmetic and manual memory management.<n>We evaluate it on 59 real-world and algorithmic subjects, where it outperforms the vanilla prompt generation baseline by 31.36% in line coverage, 26.01% in branch coverage, and 20.78% in mutation score, matching or exceeding the symbolic execution tool KLEE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-18T18:09:03Z) - GREPO: A Benchmark for Graph Neural Networks on Repository-Level Bug Localization [50.009407518866965]
Repository-level bug localization is a critical software engineering challenge.<n>GNNs offer a promising alternative due to their ability to model complex, repository-wide dependencies.<n>We introduce GREPO, the first GNN benchmark for repository-scale bug localization tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-14T23:22:15Z) - Pull Requests as a Training Signal for Repo-Level Code Editing [49.82435173554125]
Clean Pull Request (Clean-PR) is a mid-training paradigm that leverages real-world GitHub pull requests as a training signal for repository-level editing.<n>We introduce a scalable pipeline that converts noisy pull request diffs into Search/Replace edit blocks through reconstruction and validation.<n>On SWE-bench, our model significantly outperforms the instruction-tuned baseline, achieving absolute improvements of 13.6% on SWE-bench Lite and 12.3% on SWE-bench Verified.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-07T09:22:25Z) - SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints [59.645885492637845]
SOPBench is an evaluation pipeline that transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions.<n>Our approach transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions and requires agents to call these functions based on natural language SOP descriptions.<n>We evaluate 18 leading models, and results show the task is challenging even for top-tier models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-11T17:53:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.