Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Prognostics and Health Management: A Systematic Literature Review
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10047v1
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 13:20:08 GMT
- Title: Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Prognostics and Health Management: A Systematic Literature Review
- Abstract summary: This work investigates how Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) is being leveraged in the context of Prognostics and Health Management (PHM)<n>Overall, the review indicates that physics-informed approaches already provide tangible benefits.
- Score: 3.7234035006358988
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In modern industry, keeping complex systems reliable, safe, and efficient hinges on Prognostics and Health Management (PHM). Machine Learning (ML) has largely driven advancements in diagnostics and prognostics, yet purely data-driven models face inherent limitations, such as poor generalization, an inability to infer causal relationships, and a lack of interpretability. Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) helps mitigate these limitations by incorporating prior physical knowledge directly into the ML pipeline, thereby fostering growing interest in its application to PHM. This work investigates how PIML is being leveraged in the context of PHM through a systematic literature review of 212 studies. The review introduces a four-class classification scheme, consisting of observational bias, inductive bias, learning bias, and hybrid approaches, and further categorizes studies by PHM task. Across all four classes, the reviewed studies consistently demonstrate improved predictive performance over conventional baselines across a broad range of assets, although the literature is heavily skewed toward lithium-ion batteries and bearings, and dominated by problem-specific solutions. Overall, the review indicates that physics-informed approaches already provide tangible benefits, whereas claims of improvements concerning some of the aforementioned limitations lack sufficient supporting evidence. Future research should prioritize transferable design patterns, benchmarks comparing integration strategies, and uncertainty-aware models that are lightweight and robust enough for online deployment in real-world settings.
Related papers
- MaP: A Unified Framework for Reliable Evaluation of Pre-training Dynamics [72.00014675808228]
Instability in Large Language Models evaluation process obscures true learning dynamics.<n>We introduce textbfMaP, a framework that integrates underlineMerging underlineand the underlinePass@k metric.<n>Experiments show that MaP yields significantly smoother performance curves, reduces inter-run variance, and ensures more consistent rankings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T11:40:27Z) - From Physics to Machine Learning and Back: Part II - Learning and Observational Bias in PHM [52.64097278841485]
Review examines how incorporating learning and observational biases through physics-informed modeling and data strategies can guide models toward physically consistent and reliable predictions.<n>Fast adaptation methods including meta-learning and few-shot learning are reviewed alongside domain generalization techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T14:15:43Z) - A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Applications in Power System Protection and Disturbance Management [5.539105299550525]
This scoping review synthesizes recent literature on machine learning (ML) applications in power system protection and disturbance management.<n>Three key objectives are addressed: (i) assessing the scope of ML research in protection tasks; (ii) evaluating ML performance across diverse operational scenarios; and (iii) identifying methods suitable for evolving grid conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-10T23:19:28Z) - Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z) - A Survey of Predictive Maintenance Methods: An Analysis of Prognostics via Classification and Regression [0.9802228981482947]
Predictive maintenance (PdM) has become a crucial element of modern industrial practice.<n>Machine learning and deep learning have enabled more precise forecasts of equipment failure and remaining useful life (RUL)<n>In this review, we look across a range of PdM methodologies, while focusing more strongly on the comparative use of classification and regression methods in prognostics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-25T02:22:23Z) - Self-Healing Machine Learning: A Framework for Autonomous Adaptation in Real-World Environments [50.310636905746975]
Real-world machine learning systems often encounter model performance degradation due to distributional shifts in the underlying data generating process.
Existing approaches to addressing shifts, such as concept drift adaptation, are limited by their reason-agnostic nature.
We propose self-healing machine learning (SHML) to overcome these limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T20:05:51Z) - Navigating Uncertainties in Machine Learning for Structural Dynamics: A Comprehensive Survey of Probabilistic and Non-Probabilistic Approaches in Forward and Inverse Problems [2.5142646517195693]
This paper presents a comprehensive review on navigating uncertainties in machine learning (ML)<n>It lists uncertainty-aware approaches into probabilistic methods and non-probabilistic methods.<n>The review aims to assist researchers and practitioners in making informed decisions when utilizing ML techniques to address uncertainties in structural dynamic problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-16T09:43:01Z) - MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making.<n>We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill.<n>Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z) - A Review of Physics-Informed Machine Learning Methods with Applications
to Condition Monitoring and Anomaly Detection [1.124958340749622]
PIML is the incorporation of known physical laws and constraints into machine learning algorithms.
This study presents a comprehensive overview of PIML techniques in the context of condition monitoring.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T11:29:44Z) - Weak Supervision Performance Evaluation via Partial Identification [46.73061437177238]
Programmatic Weak Supervision (PWS) enables supervised model training without direct access to ground truth labels.
We present a novel method to address this challenge by framing model evaluation as a partial identification problem.
Our approach derives reliable bounds on key metrics without requiring labeled data, overcoming core limitations in current weak supervision evaluation techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T07:15:11Z) - Machine Learning in Nano-Scale Biomedical Engineering [77.75587007080894]
We review the existing research regarding the use of machine learning in nano-scale biomedical engineering.
The main challenges that can be formulated as ML problems are classified into the three main categories.
For each of the presented methodologies, special emphasis is given to its principles, applications, and limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-05T15:45:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.