Are We Really Making Progress in Group Recommendation? Unmasking the Tie-Breaking Illusion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11190v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:50:08 GMT
• Title: Are We Really Making Progress in Group Recommendation? Unmasking the Tie-Breaking Illusion
• Abstract summary: Group recommendation methods have reported strong improvements on standard benchmarks.<n>But it remains unclear whether these gains always reflect genuine advances in modeling group preferences.<n>We show that several recent methods are affected by a systematic evaluation bias caused by the interaction between training-time score compression and evaluation-time deterministic tie-breaking.
• Score: 4.153834414190214
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent group recommendation methods have reported strong improvements on standard benchmarks, but it remains unclear whether these gains always reflect genuine advances in modeling group preferences. In this paper, we show that several recent methods are affected by a systematic evaluation bias caused by the interaction between training-time score compression and evaluation-time deterministic tie-breaking. Specifically, an additional sigmoid transformation before the BPR objective can greatly increase tied top scores, making top-K metrics such as HR@K and NDCG@K highly sensitive to how ties are resolved. We revisit recent representative methods and their baselines on CAMRa2011 and Mafengwo under both group and user recommendation settings, and evaluate them with a tie-aware protocol that computes the exact expectation of HR@K and NDCG@K under uniform random tie-breaking. Our results show that many previously reported improvements shrink substantially under tie-aware evaluation, and the relative ranking of methods can change markedly. We further show that the additional sigmoid may act as implicit margin smoothing during optimization, and that temperature-scaled BPR can retain much of this benefit without inducing severe tie inflation. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of tie-aware evaluation for establishing reliable progress in group recommendation. The code is available at https://github.com/songduoma/TieAwareGroupRec.

Related papers

• RRPO: Reference-Relative Policy Optimization with Stratified Conditional Rollouts [84.20747697259326]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has shown strong effectiveness in reinforcement learning from verifiable feedback.<n>We propose textbfReference-Relative Policy Optimization (RRPO), which generalizes GRPO by replacing direct correctness-based advantage construction with reference-relative contrastive comparisons.<n>We evaluate RRPO using anchor-based contrastive advantages throughout policy optimization, without relying on task ground-truth verifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T19:40:25Z)
• CoSimRec: Measuring Coordinated-Content Penetration in Recommender Feedback Loops [2.633426951319157]
  CoSimRec is an offline agent-based evaluation framework that models coordinated accounts, dynamic ranking, non-bot responses, and ranking interventions.<n>CoSimRec introduces the Algorithmic Penetration Rate metric family to measure target content's share of non-bot exposure and engagement.<n>We evaluate CoSimRec on MIND, MovieLens, and LastFM using random, popularity-based, feedback-sensitive, MF, and BPR-MF recommenders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-16T15:24:09Z)
• The Hidden Bias of Process Reward Models:PRISM for Rewarding the Right Reasoning [54.0056619145783]
  Process Reward Models (PRMs) improve credit assignment for reasoning by providing step-level feedback.<n>We identify a hidden bias in PRMs caused by severe imbalance in step-level training data.<n>We propose PRISM, a policy-aware PRM training framework that learns from contrastive step-level comparisons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T06:22:33Z)
• Don't Let Bandit Feedback Pull Continual LLM-Recommender Updates Off Target [42.681980014826536]
  Generative recommenders (LLM-Rec) require continual post-deployment updates.<n> deployment logs provide only policy-shaped contextual bandit feedback.<n>We propose an Anchored Bandit Policy Optimization framework for continual LLM-Rec updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T11:10:44Z)
• Revisiting Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards from a Contrastive Perspective [10.958642517467721]
  We present a framework for Contrastive Sequence-level Policy Optimization in RLVR.<n>ConSPO replaces GRPO's clipped ratio-based scores with length-normalized sequence log-probabilities.<n>ConSPO consistently outperforms several strong RLVR baselines on challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T04:02:36Z)
• Mitigating Mismatch within Reference-based Preference Optimization [55.07698254211876]
  Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become the de facto standard for offline preference alignment of large language models.<n>DPO weighs each update relative to a reference, which stabilizes the training by regularizing the updates within a trusted region.<n>This reliance becomes problematic for pessimistic pairs, where the reference model prefers the rejected response.<n>We modify DPO to treat the reference as neutral when it is pessimistic by replacing $_-_mathrmref$ with $_-max0,_mathrmref$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T12:55:51Z)
• Anchoring Values in Temporal and Group Dimensions for Flow Matching Model Alignment [61.80228667422234]
  VGPO redefines value estimation across both temporal and group dimensions.<n>It transforms the sparse terminal reward into dense, process-aware value estimates.<n>It replaces standard group normalization with a novel process enhanced by absolute values to maintain a stable optimization signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-13T16:31:26Z)
• Don't Waste Mistakes: Leveraging Negative RL-Groups via Confidence Reweighting [24.822152032771736]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a standard recipe for improving large language models.<n>We show that negative groups can be leveraged without extra supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T18:01:44Z)
• Uncertainty-Penalized Direct Preference Optimization [52.387088396044206]
  We develop a pessimistic framework for DPO by introducing preference uncertainty penalization schemes. The penalization serves as a correction to the loss which attenuates the loss gradient for uncertain samples. We show improved overall performance compared to vanilla DPO, as well as better completions on prompts from high-uncertainty chosen/rejected responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T14:24:37Z)
• Permutative Preference Alignment from Listwise Ranking of Human Judgments [40.23480751285947]
  We develop an end-to-end alignment algorithm by approximating NDCG with a differentiable surrogate loss.<n>We show that NDCG-based approaches improve ranking accuracy more effectively than B-T-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T03:49:28Z)
• Learning by Sorting: Self-supervised Learning with Group Ordering Constraints [75.89238437237445]
  This paper proposes a new variation of the contrastive learning objective, Group Ordering Constraints (GroCo) It exploits the idea of sorting the distances of positive and negative pairs and computing the respective loss based on how many positive pairs have a larger distance than the negative pairs, and thus are not ordered correctly. We evaluate the proposed formulation on various self-supervised learning benchmarks and show that it not only leads to improved results compared to vanilla contrastive learning but also shows competitive performance to comparable methods in linear probing and outperforms current methods in k-NN performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T11:17:55Z)
• Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap [140.98628848491146]
  We introduce deconfounding scores, which induce better overlap without biasing the target of estimation. We show that deconfounding scores satisfy a zero-covariance condition that is identifiable in observed data. In particular, we show that this technique could be an attractive alternative to standard regularizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T18:50:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.