CARA: Cognitive Adaptive Recommendation Agent

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16919v1
• Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 19:57:59 GMT
• Title: CARA: Cognitive Adaptive Recommendation Agent
• Abstract summary: We propose CARA, a framework that formulates recommendation as a structured decision-making process.<n>The core intuition of CARA is that user decisions are jointly shaped by two complementary mechanisms: intuitive affective preference and deliberate rational evaluation.<n>CARA achieves the best performance on most evaluation metrics, with relative improvements of up to 10.15% over the baseline.
• Score: 3.268212305496309
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in large language models and agent-based recommendation frameworks have introduced new opportunities for more flexible and context-aware recommendation. However, existing methods still largely rely on semantic matching, end-to-end generation, or loosely structured agent workflows, without explicitly modeling how user preferences are processed and translated into final decisions. To address this limitation, we propose CARA, a cognitively inspired recommendation framework that formulates recommendation as a structured decision-making process. The core intuition of CARA is that user decisions are jointly shaped by two complementary mechanisms: intuitive affective preference and deliberate rational evaluation. Accordingly, CARA organizes recommendation into two coordinated stages: candidate filtering, which narrows the search space based on coarse-grained preference constraints, and dual-perspective decision modeling, which captures recommendation decisions through affective and rational judgment. We further introduce a boundary-aware KTO strategy that prioritizes instructions the model can solve occasionally but not consistently, thereby increasing the density of informative preference signals. Extensive experiments on three Amazon Reviews domains show that CARA achieves the best performance on most evaluation metrics, with relative improvements of up to 10.15% over the baseline.

Related papers

• Think2Go: Generative Next POI Recommendation with LLM Reasoning [57.37706163990998]
  Next Point-of-Interest (POI) recommendation task focuses on mining user behavioral preference patterns from historical check-ins to provide personalized suggestions for the next destination.<n>Existing methods rely on shallow contextual information and handcrafted feature interactions to predict the next POI.<n>We propose Think2Go, a novel generative next POI recommendation framework, which enhances the model's comprehension of SID representations and explores diverse spatial-temporal patterns via test-time computational scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T03:52:20Z)
• Decisive: Guiding User Decisions with Optimal Preference Elicitation from Unstructured Documents [3.7993411952027163]
  We present Decisive, an interactive decision-making framework that combines document-grounded reasoning with Bayesian preference inference.<n>Our approach grounds decisions in an objective option-scoring matrix extracted from source documents, while actively learning a user's latent preference vector through targeted elicitation.<n>Users answer pairwise tradeoff questions adaptively selected to maximize information gain over the final decision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T11:42:51Z)
• HARPO: Hierarchical Agentic Reasoning for User-Aligned Conversational Recommendation [10.766058469348382]
  We propose HARPO, an agentic framework that reframes conversational recommendation as a structured decision-making process.<n>HarPO integrates hierarchical preference learning that decomposes recommendation quality into interpretable dimensions.<n>We demonstrate consistent improvements over strong baselines on recommendation-centric metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-11T06:07:15Z)
• Tree of Preferences for Diversified Recommendation [54.183647833064136]
  We study diversified recommendation from a data-bias perspective.<n>Inspired by the outstanding performance of large language models (LLMs) in zero-shot inference leveraging world knowledge, we propose a novel approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T04:13:17Z)
• Research on Conversational Recommender System Considering Consumer Types [8.48366251750266]
  We propose a framework that integrates consumer type modeling into dialogue recommendation.<n>Based on consumer type theory, we define four user categories--dependent, efficient, cautious, and expert--derived from two dimensions.<n>Experiments on LastFM, Amazon-Book, and Yelp show that CTCRS improves recommendation success rate and reduces interaction turns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T15:15:52Z)
• What Makes LLMs Effective Sequential Recommenders? A Study on Preference Intensity and Temporal Context [56.590259941275434]
  RecPO is a preference optimization framework for sequential recommendation.<n>It exploits adaptive reward margins based on inferred preference hierarchies and temporal signals.<n>It mirrors key characteristics of human decision-making: favoring timely satisfaction, maintaining coherent preferences, and exercising discernment under shifting contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T21:09:29Z)
• Slow Thinking for Sequential Recommendation [88.46598279655575]
  We present a novel slow thinking recommendation model, named STREAM-Rec.<n>Our approach is capable of analyzing historical user behavior, generating a multi-step, deliberative reasoning process, and delivering personalized recommendations.<n>In particular, we focus on two key challenges: (1) identifying the suitable reasoning patterns in recommender systems, and (2) exploring how to effectively stimulate the reasoning capabilities of traditional recommenders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T15:53:30Z)
• Beyond Predictions: A Participatory Framework for Multi-Stakeholder Decision-Making [3.3044728148521623]
  We propose a participatory framework that reframes decision-making as a multi-stakeholder optimization problem.<n>Our modular, model-agnostic framework employs k-fold cross-validation to fine-tune user-provided prediction models.<n>A synthetic scoring mechanism aggregates user-defined preferences across multiple metrics to rank strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T16:27:40Z)
• Reason4Rec: Large Language Models for Recommendation with Deliberative User Preference Alignment [69.11529841118671]
  We propose a new Deliberative Recommendation task, which incorporates explicit reasoning about user preferences as an additional alignment goal.<n>We then introduce the Reasoning-powered Recommender framework for deliberative user preference alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T07:17:54Z)
• An incremental preference elicitation-based approach to learning potentially non-monotonic preferences in multi-criteria sorting [53.36437745983783]
  We first construct a max-margin optimization-based model to model potentially non-monotonic preferences. We devise information amount measurement methods and question selection strategies to pinpoint the most informative alternative in each iteration. Two incremental preference elicitation-based algorithms are developed to learn potentially non-monotonic preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T14:36:20Z)
• Bayesian Persuasion for Algorithmic Recourse [28.586165301962485]
  In some situations, the underlying predictive model is deliberately kept secret to avoid gaming. This opacity forces the decision subjects to rely on incomplete information when making strategic feature modifications. We capture such settings as a game of Bayesian persuasion, in which the decision-maker sends a signal, e.g., an action recommendation, to a decision subject to incentivize them to take desirable actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-12T17:18:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.