Statistical Assessments of Representational Reforms: A Case Study from Los Angeles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17083v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 19:43:11 GMT
• Title: Statistical Assessments of Representational Reforms: A Case Study from Los Angeles
• Abstract summary: We develop a statistical framework for the prospective evaluation of electoral reforms.<n>We apply this framework to reforms being considered for the Los Angeles City Council.<n>We find that expanding the Council alone is unlikely to substantially improve representation for underrepresented communities.
• Score: 0.042970700836450486
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Electoral reforms -- including changes to district boundaries, electoral rules, and the size of elected bodies -- are a recurrent feature of American state and municipal politics. The representational impact of such reforms is challenging to assess before they are implemented, and even well-intentioned civic reformers are often surprised by the unintended consequences of changes to the political system. We develop a statistical framework for the prospective evaluation of electoral reforms by integrating several modes of analysis: descriptive statistics of the voter file, probabilistic race and ethnicity imputation, ecological inference, and redistricting simulations via ensembles. Together, these tools provide a unified assessment of how proposed reforms affect whose voices are ultimately heard in government. We apply this framework to reforms currently being considered for the Los Angeles City Council, including increasing the number of single-member districts, adopting ranked-choice voting, and introducing multimember districts elected by proportional ranked choice voting. We find that expanding the Council alone is unlikely to substantially improve representation for underrepresented communities. In contrast, eliminating low-turnout primary elections and adopting multimember districts produce larger improvements in representational equity. Our analyses were shared with L.A.'s Charter Reform Commission via public testimony in late 2025. Although motivated by Los Angeles, the framework is broadly applicable to evaluating prospective electoral reforms across American jurisdictions.

Related papers

• Simulating Single Transferable Voting for the Colorado House of Representatives [0.0]
  Using multi-member districts and ranked ballots with STV would affect the representation of political parties in the Colorado House of Representatives.<n>Our simulated STV elections for the Colorado House of Representatives gave more proportional representation for Democrats and Republicans than the current first-past-the-post system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-27T22:08:39Z)
• 3+ Seat Risk-Limiting Audits for Single Transferable Vote Elections [56.12949230611067]
  We present an assertion-based approach to conducting full or partial RLAs for STV elections with three or more seats.<n>We show that we can quite often form partial audits that verify most, and sometimes all, of the reported winners.<n>We evaluate our method on a dataset of over 500 three- and four-seat STV elections from the 2017 and 2022 local council elections in Scotland.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T00:29:53Z)
• Efficient Lower Bounding of Single Transferable Vote Election Margins [56.12949230611067]
  Single transferable vote (STV) is a system of preferential proportional voting employed in multi-seat elections.<n>The margin of victory, or simply'margin', is the smallest number of ballots that need to be manipulated to alter the set of winners.<n>Lower bounds on the margin can also be used for this purpose, in cases where exact margins are difficult to compute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T13:39:23Z)
• ElectionSim: Massive Population Election Simulation Powered by Large Language Model Driven Agents [70.17229548653852]
  We introduce ElectionSim, an innovative election simulation framework based on large language models. We present a million-level voter pool sampled from social media platforms to support accurate individual simulation. We also introduce PPE, a poll-based presidential election benchmark to assess the performance of our framework under the U.S. presidential election scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T05:25:50Z)
• Convergences and Divergences in the 2024 Judicial Reform in Mexico: A Neural Network Analysis of Transparency, Judicial Autonomy, and Public Acceptance [0.0]
  The study utilizes neural networks to evaluate the 2024 judicial reform in Mexico. It is a proposal designed to overhaul the judicial system by increasing transparency, judicial autonomy, and introducing the popular election of judges. Key areas of convergence include enhanced transparency and judicial autonomy, which are seen as improvements to the system. However, major points of divergence, such as the high costs of implementation and concerns about the legitimacy of electing judges, pose significant challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T17:35:26Z)
• Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models [54.48283690603358]
  This study seeks to identify and quantify biases in simulating political samples with Large Language Models. Using the GPT-3.5-Turbo model, we leverage data from the American National Election Studies, German Longitudinal Election Study, Zuobiao dataset, and China Family Panel Studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T05:52:26Z)
• Comparing Voting Districts with Uncertain Data Envelopment Analysis [0.0]
  Gerrymandering voting districts is one of the most salient concerns of contemporary American society. We show how to use uncertain data envelopment analysis to assess maps on a variety of metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T20:12:27Z)
• Exploring Fairness in District-based Multi-party Elections under different Voting Rules using Stochastic Simulations [0.5076419064097732]
  Many democratic societies use district-based elections, where the region under consideration is geographically divided into districts and a representative is chosen for each district based on the preferences of the electors who reside there. We show that this can lead to situations where many electors are dissatisfied with the election results, which is not desirable in a democracy. Inspired by current literature on fairness of Machine Learning algorithms, we define measures of fairness to quantify the satisfaction of electors, irrespective of their political choices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T18:03:03Z)
• Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur: Visual Communication of Uncertainty in Election Polls [56.8172499765118]
  We discuss potential sources of bias in nowcasting and forecasting. Concepts are presented to attenuate the issue of falsely perceived accuracy. One key idea is the use of Probabilities of Events instead of party shares.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T07:02:24Z)
• A Computational Approach to Measuring Vote Elasticity and Competitiveness [24.88022242349515]
  competitiveness metrics evaluate a districting plan based on the extent to which district-level outcomes are in play or are likely to be closely contested. This paper examines several classes of competitiveness metrics motivated by recent reform proposals and then evaluate their potential outcomes across large ensembles of districting plans at the Congressional and state Senate levels. We highlight situation-specific difficulties in creating good competitiveness metrics and show that optimizing competitiveness can produce unintended consequences on other partisan metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T14:01:31Z)
• Electoral Forecasting Using a Novel Temporal Attenuation Model: Predicting the US Presidential Elections [91.3755431537592]
  We develop a novel macro-scale temporal attenuation (TA) model, which uses pre-election poll data to improve forecasting accuracy. Our hypothesis is that the timing of publicizing opinion polls plays a significant role in how opinion oscillates, especially right before elections. We present two different implementations of the TA model, which accumulate an average forecasting error of 2.8-3.28 points over the 48-year period.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T09:21:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.