Towards Reversible Forgetting: Managing Obsolete Knowledge in Continual Enterprise AI Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18177v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:38:46 GMT
• Title: Towards Reversible Forgetting: Managing Obsolete Knowledge in Continual Enterprise AI Agents
• Abstract summary: Continual learning has traditionally treated forgetting as a failure, emphasizing preservation of previously acquired knowledge as environments evolve.<n>We argue that this objective is incomplete for enterprise AI agents operating in non-stationary environments.<n>We propose forgetting: a conceptual framework with three operational memory states: active, dormant, and retired, and a reactivation transition that can restore dormant knowledge when its relevance returns.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Continual learning has traditionally treated forgetting as a failure, emphasizing preservation of previously acquired knowledge as environments evolve. We argue that this objective is incomplete for enterprise AI agents operating in non-stationary environments, where customers, policies, tools, workflows, regulations, and market conditions change over time. Indiscriminate retention can allow obsolete knowledge to influence decisions, creating negative transfer and operational risk. We therefore propose reversible forgetting: a conceptual framework with three operational memory states: active, dormant, and retired, and a reactivation transition that can restore dormant knowledge when its relevance returns. We instantiate the framework as a Hysteretic Reversible Memory Controller that accumulates relevance evidence, uses asymmetric thresholds to prevent state oscillation, tests reactivation in shadow mode, and gates retirement through policy. The framework reduces the influence of obsolete information without conflating temporary suppression with permanent erasure. Finance illustrates the idea: knowledge useful under one market regime may become harmful under another yet regain relevance when similar conditions recur.

Related papers

• ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step [74.83535434786145]
  We introduce ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark designed to isolate behavioral reasoning.<n>The benchmark requires agents to uncover hidden tool behaviors entirely through trial-and-error interaction.<n>Our evaluation of state-of-the-art language models reveals that successful initial discovery does not translate into robust adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T15:07:46Z)
• Closing the Feedback Loop: From Experience Extraction to Insight Governance in Verbal Reinforcement Learning [11.366112232592592]
  Training-free verbal reinforcement learning enables LLM agents to learn from world feedback.<n>We propose a three-layer architecture -- rules, evidence, and skills -- connected by a feedback-driven curation loop.<n>We show that the same accumulated experience either degrades performance below the zero-shot baseline or dramatically improves accuracy and risk-adjusted returns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T06:55:55Z)
• Taming "Zombie'' Agents: A Markov State-Aware Framework for Resilient Multi-Agent Evolution [50.50276752935017]
  AgentRevive is a Markov state-aware framework for resilient multi-agent evolution.<n>Our approach dynamically manages agent collaboration through soft state transitions.<n>It significantly reduces token consumption through state-aware agent scheduling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T09:38:18Z)
• AI Debris: Residual Risk and the Afterlife of Failed AI Systems [0.0]
  This paper argues that decommissioned AI systems generate residual risk, termed AI debris, that persists after model removal.<n>The paper develops a typology of debris domains and identifies mechanisms through which debris persists.<n>To operationalise the concept, the paper proposes an evaluator-ready AI Debris Decommissioning Protocol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T14:59:15Z)
• Robust Continual Unlearning against Knowledge Erosion and Forgetting Reversal [31.09301411794716]
  Machine unlearning plays a crucial role in realizing the right to be forgotten'' in artificial intelligence.<n>We evaluate existing unlearning algorithms in a more realistic scenario where unlearning is conducted repeatedly.<n>We propose SAFER, a continual unlearning framework that maintains representation stability for retain data while enforcing negative logit margins for forget data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T05:35:54Z)
• PolicyBank: Evolving Policy Understanding for LLM Agents [51.86716874651299]
  PolicyBank maintains structured, tool-level policy insights and iteratively refines them.<n>PolicyBank closes up to 82% of the gap toward a human oracle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T20:29:30Z)
• Memory Undone: Between Knowing and Not Knowing in Data Systems [14.165847961943193]
  We show how forgetting can simultaneously protect rights and enable silencing.<n>We propose reframing unlearning as a first-class capability in knowledge infrastructures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T18:29:17Z)
• AI Agents Need Memory Control Over More Context [0.0]
  We introduce a bio-inspired memory controller that replaces transcript replay with a bounded internal state updated online at each turn.<n>ACC consistently maintains bounded memory and exhibits more stable multi-turn behavior.<n>Results show that cognitive compression provides a practical and effective foundation for reliable memory control in long-horizon AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T18:01:59Z)
• Beyond Heuristics: A Decision-Theoretic Framework for Agent Memory Management [49.71055327567513]
  We argue that memory management should be viewed as a sequential decision-making problem under uncertainty.<n>Our contribution is not a new algorithm, but a principled reframing that clarifies the limitations of approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-25T08:23:03Z)
• Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning [53.10194953873209]
  We show how to leverage proxy criticality metrics to generate safety margins. We evaluate our approach on learned policies from APE-X and A3C within an Atari environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T16:49:54Z)
• Dichotomy of Control: Separating What You Can Control from What You Cannot [129.62135987416164]
  We propose a future-conditioned supervised learning framework that separates mechanisms within a policy's control (actions) from those beyond a policy's control (environmentity) We show that DoC yields policies that are consistent with their conditioning inputs, ensuring that conditioning a learned policy on a desired high-return future outcome will correctly induce high-return behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T17:49:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.