Global Crises and National Policies: A Large Scale Analysis of Political Content in German Language Online Media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18268v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 19:39:00 GMT
• Title: Global Crises and National Policies: A Large Scale Analysis of Political Content in German Language Online Media
• Abstract summary: We employ modern political text analysis methods demonstrating the potential of automated fine-grained political bias analysis in online media.<n>We conduct an analysis of political content in German language online media during the period 2019-2022.<n>Our analysis identifies thematic similarity between national (German and Swiss) reporting, particularly for categories driven by international events.<n>A comparison of newspaper and Twitter discourse reveals that both media converge around a shared core during the pandemic, yet differ in intensity and temporal dynamics.
• Score: 0.17188280334580194
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Today most media content is consumed based on algorithmic recommendations. Evidence suggests that this can lead to politically biased media consumption patterns. Automated extraction of political agendas from texts can reveal and analyze political biases in online media -- and thus help fostering politically unbiased media consumption. Here we employ modern political text analysis methods demonstrating the potential of automated fine-grained political bias analysis in online media. We conduct an analysis of political content in German language online media during the period 2019--2022, encompassing several million articles and tweets covering events with profound societal impact globally and nationally, the COVID-19 pandemic and the beginning of the war in Ukraine. Our analysis identifies thematic similarity between national (German and Swiss) reporting, particularly for categories driven by international events. We also find divergences emerging in domestically influenced categories, reflecting differences in national policies and institutional structures. A comparison of newspaper and Twitter discourse reveals that both media converge around a shared core during the pandemic, yet differ in intensity and temporal dynamics. Newspapers exhibit more stable political content, while Twitter reacts through short-lived event-driven spikes. These findings indicate that international crises act as a powerful synchronizing force on political content in classical media, temporarily overriding both national and media-form differences. Our automated political analysis empowers citizens by rendering political agendas in online media transparent. This transparency also enables media outlets to bridge the gap between algorithm-driven echo chambers and a more informed, balanced public discourse.

Related papers

• Automated Identification of Competing Narratives in Political Discourse on Social Media [0.0]
  This paper presents an unsupervised framework for identifying and characterizing competing narratives in political discourse on social media.<n>The framework is able to detect the key competing narratives, highlighting the divergent framings and conflicts surrounding trending political topics.<n>The findings contribute to the broader understanding of how narratives propagate within the digital public sphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-10T08:10:33Z)
• Cross-National Evidence of Disproportionate Media Visibility for the Radical Right in the 2024 European Elections [0.030786914102688592]
  We analyzed news from leading national outlets in Austria, Germany, Ireland, Poland, and Portugal.<n>We identified parties, political leaders, and groups from the article's URLs and titles.<n>Cross-country comparison shows that the Mainstream and the Radical Right were mentioned more often than the other political groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T15:00:59Z)
• In Times of Crisis: An Exploratory Study of Media and Political Discourse on YouTube During the 2024 French Elections [2.456962018536084]
  We analyze over 100,000 video transcripts and metadata from 74 French YouTube channels operated by national news outlets, local media, and political figures.<n>The results reveal distinct thematic patterns across the political spectrum and media types.<n>Less polarizing themes such as video games and nature showed higher approval, reflected in like-to-view ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T16:40:27Z)
• Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z)
• Unveiling Political Influence Through Social Media: Network and Causal Dynamics in the 2022 French Presidential Election [0.0]
  During the 2022 French presidential election, we collected daily Twitter messages on key topics posted by political candidates and their close networks.<n>Using a data-driven approach, we analyze interactions among political parties, identifying central topics that shape the landscape of political debate.<n>Our findings demonstrate how specific issues, such as health and foreign policy, act as catalysts for cross-party influence, particularly during critical election phases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T16:35:02Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries.<n>We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• Same Words, Different Meanings: Interpretable Predictions of Polarization Trends in Broadcast Media Language and Granger Causal Effects on Public Discourse [7.0525662747824365]
  We investigate the relationship between broadcast news media language and social media discourse. By analyzing a decade's worth of closed captions from CNN and Fox News along with topically corresponding discourse from Twitter, we show how semantic polarization between these outlets has evolved. Our results demonstrate a sharp increase in polarization in how topically important keywords are discussed between the two channels, especially after 2016, with overall highest peaks occurring in 2020.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-20T23:59:26Z)
• Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles [55.92100606666497]
  We first adopt a human-guided machine learning framework to develop a new dataset for hyperpartisan news title detection. Overall the Right media tends to use proportionally more hyperpartisan titles. We identify three major topics including foreign issues, political systems, and societal issues that are suggestive of hyperpartisanship in news titles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T05:56:58Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.