Bounded Precision-Geometry Scaling for Robust Multi-Task Learning under Loss Scale Mismatch
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21653v1
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:48:51 GMT
- Title: Bounded Precision-Geometry Scaling for Robust Multi-Task Learning under Loss Scale Mismatch
- Abstract summary: Multi-task learning often combines losses that span several orders of magnitude, causing homoscedastic uncertainty weighting to degrade severely.<n>We propose Bounded Precision-Geometry Scaling (BPGS), a method that maps each task's log-variance through a bounded sigmoid parameterisation anchored to detached batch loss statistics.<n>We evaluate BPGS on synthetic stress tests and three real-world benchmarks: NYUv2 dense prediction, Yeast multi-label classification, and RF1 multi-target regression.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Multi-task learning often combines losses that span several orders of magnitude, causing homoscedastic uncertainty weighting to degrade severely. We propose Bounded Precision-Geometry Scaling (BPGS), a method that maps each task's log-variance through a bounded sigmoid parameterisation anchored to detached batch loss statistics, and decouples network optimisation from uncertainty optimisation. Its normalised task weights are provably invariant to uniform rescaling under non-degenerate loss scales. We evaluate BPGS on synthetic stress tests and three real-world benchmarks: NYUv2 dense prediction, Yeast multi-label classification, and RF1 multi-target regression. Under pure loss rescaling from $\times 1$ to $\times 1000$, its macro score changes from 0.777 to 0.778, whereas Kendall weighting drops from 0.780 to 0.637; $\ell_1$-normalising Kendall's weights does not close the gap. On NYUv2, BPGS records the lowest depth absolute relative error (0.223), depth RMSE (0.790), and total loss (1.891) among all compared methods, including Nash-MTL. Sensitivity studies on batch size and calibration show small variation across the tested ranges, and runtime overhead relative to Kendall is under 1%. BPGS posts the highest Yeast micro-F1 (0.616) and is competitive on RF1, though PCGrad leads RMSE and MAE there. These findings establish BPGS as a scale-robust alternative to homoscedastic uncertainty weighting, notably effective when loss-scale disparities dominate multi-task optimisation.
Related papers
- Leakage-Robust Evaluation and Data-Scale Sensitivity of Attention-Enhanced Multi-Task Learning for Joint Fault Diagnosis and Remaining Useful Life Estimation [0.0]
Multi-task deep learning models can be affected by how sliding-window sequences are split into training and test sets.<n>We show that naive splitting can inflate classification accuracy from a genuine 20-60 percent to 99.9 percent.<n>We introduce a chunk-based, leakage-audited splitting protocol and evaluate all models using five seeds, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey HSD tests.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-17T20:33:36Z) - Modeling Normal Is All You Need: Joint Latent Clustering for Anomaly Detection in Multimodal Cyber-Physical Systems [47.027290803102666]
Normal behaviour is the union of many imbalanced, curved, thin-fringed operating regimes.<n>We model the normal law with a jointly learned latent representation plus explicit Gaussian-mixture mode clustering.<n>We evaluate under a deliberately fair protocol: raw point-wise metrics with no point adjustment, a trivial-detector difficulty split, prevalence-matched F1, and train-normal-only calibration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-07T10:10:00Z) - BOKBO (Best of K Bad Options): Calibrated Abstention for VLA Policies [1.3918848543076061]
Test-time scaling for vision-suite-action (VLA) policies, methods such as RoboMonkey, SEAL, MG-Select, and V-GPS, samples K candidate action chunks at inference and executes the verifier-best.<n>We propose BOKBO, the first conformal abstention layer for K-sample VLA inference, providing finite-sample distribution-free guarantees on executed-violation rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T23:39:09Z) - Bug or Feature$^2$: Weight Drift, Activation Sparsity and Spikes [53.726365933748134]
We analyze a negative weight drift induced by the interaction between standard losses and positively biased activation functions.<n>We characterize the sparsity-accuracy tradeoff across 79 configurations and identify a sharp accuracy cliff above $sim$70% activation sparsity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-17T21:29:20Z) - Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol [69.11739400975445]
We introduce the first theoretical framework for analyzing error accumulation in Model Context Protocol (MCP) agents.<n>We show that cumulative distortion exhibits linear growth and high-probability deviations bounded by $O(sqrtT)$.<n>Key findings include: semantic weighting reduces distortion by 80%, and periodic re-grounding approximately every 9 steps suffices for error control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-10T21:08:53Z) - Multi-Task Deep Learning for Surface Metrology [0.0]
A reproducible deep learning framework is presented for surface metrology to predict surface texture parameters.<n>Uncertainty is modelled via quantile and heteroscedastic heads with post-hoc conformal calibration to yield calibrated intervals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-23T08:38:18Z) - Semiparametric conformal prediction [79.6147286161434]
We construct a conformal prediction set accounting for the joint correlation structure of the vector-valued non-conformity scores.<n>We flexibly estimate the joint cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the scores.<n>Our method yields desired coverage and competitive efficiency on a range of real-world regression problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T14:29:02Z) - Nearest Neighbor Sampling for Covariate Shift Adaptation [7.940293148084844]
We propose a new covariate shift adaptation method which avoids estimating the weights.
The basic idea is to directly work on unlabeled target data, labeled according to the $k$-nearest neighbors in the source dataset.
Our experiments show that it achieves drastic reduction in the running time with remarkable accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-15T17:28:09Z) - Label Distributionally Robust Losses for Multi-class Classification:
Consistency, Robustness and Adaptivity [55.29408396918968]
We study a family of loss functions named label-distributionally robust (LDR) losses for multi-class classification.
Our contributions include both consistency and robustness by establishing top-$k$ consistency of LDR losses for multi-class classification.
We propose a new adaptive LDR loss that automatically adapts the individualized temperature parameter to the noise degree of class label of each instance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-30T00:27:30Z) - Attentional-Biased Stochastic Gradient Descent [74.49926199036481]
We present a provable method (named ABSGD) for addressing the data imbalance or label noise problem in deep learning.
Our method is a simple modification to momentum SGD where we assign an individual importance weight to each sample in the mini-batch.
ABSGD is flexible enough to combine with other robust losses without any additional cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-13T03:41:52Z) - Least Squares Regression with Markovian Data: Fundamental Limits and
Algorithms [69.45237691598774]
We study the problem of least squares linear regression where the data-points are dependent and are sampled from a Markov chain.
We establish sharp information theoretic minimax lower bounds for this problem in terms of $tau_mathsfmix$.
We propose an algorithm based on experience replay--a popular reinforcement learning technique--that achieves a significantly better error rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-16T04:26:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.