Addressing Trust in AI Systems through Education: A Didactic Perspective
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02453v1
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 11:20:14 GMT
- Title: Addressing Trust in AI Systems through Education: A Didactic Perspective
- Abstract summary: ICE-T is a didactic framework that integrates three mutually reinforcing facets.<n>We argue that the three facets supply the cognitive mechanisms that the trust calibration literature identifies as drivers of appropriate reliance.
- Score: 0.6346772579930928
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Machine learning (ML) education faces two persistent and connected obstacles: many educational tools present ML as an opaque black box, which leaves learners with a superficial understanding, and this same opacity prevents users from forming the calibrated trust that appropriate reliance on AI systems requires. We present ICE-T, a didactic framework that integrates three mutually reinforcing facets: intermodal transfer grounded in Bruner's enactive, iconic, and symbolic modes of representation, computational thinking operationalized through the Use-Modify-Create progression, and explanatory thinking supported by a process model. Connecting the framework to the empirical literature on algorithm aversion, AI literacy, and mental model formation, and to systematic reviews of the K-12 ML activity landscape, we argue that the three facets supply the cognitive mechanisms that the trust calibration literature identifies as drivers of appropriate reliance: representational richness, graduated process control, and the capacity to contextualize errors. On this basis, we propose that trust calibration be treated as an explicit educational objective, with ICE-T as a principled and scalable means of achieving it.
Related papers
- AffordanceVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model Empowering Action Generation through Affordance-Aware Understanding [55.535374902204296]
AffordanceVLA is a unified framework that introduces structured affordance forecasting as a task-oriented intermediate representation.<n>We show that AffordanceVLA achieves strong performance across diverse manipulation scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-04T13:28:51Z) - AI Misuse in Education Is a Measurement Problem: Toward a Learning Visibility Framework [2.3412211209700997]
This paper reframes AI misuse in education as a measurement problem rooted in the loss of visibility into the learning process.<n>Rather than promoting surveillance, the framework emphasizes transparency and shared evidence as foundations for ethical AI integration in classroom settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-08T22:35:09Z) - The Vibe-Check Protocol: Quantifying Cognitive Offloading in AI Programming [5.584060970507507]
Vibe Coding'' is a paradigm where developers articulate high-level intent through natural language and delegate implementation to AI agents.<n>This paper proposes a theoretical framework to investigate the research question: textitIs Vibe Coding a better way to learn software engineering?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-02T06:13:41Z) - A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z) - Language Guided Concept Bottleneck Models for Interpretable Continual Learning [62.09201360376577]
Continual learning aims to enable learning systems to acquire new knowledge constantly without forgetting previously learned information.<n>Most existing CL methods focus primarily on preserving learned knowledge to improve model performance.<n>We introduce a novel framework that integrates language-guided Concept Bottleneck Models to address both challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-30T02:41:55Z) - Between Randomness and Arbitrariness: Some Lessons for Reliable Machine Learning at Scale [2.50194939587674]
dissertation: quantifying and mitigating sources of arbitiness in ML, randomness in uncertainty estimation and optimization algorithms, in order to achieve scalability without sacrificing reliability.
dissertation serves as an empirical proof by example that research on reliable measurement for machine learning is intimately bound up with research in law and policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T19:29:37Z) - Unpacking Approaches to Learning and Teaching Machine Learning in K-12 Education: Transparency, Ethics, and Design Activities [0.0]
We identify three approaches to how learning and teaching machine learning could be conceptualized.
One of them, a data-driven approach, emphasizes providing young people with opportunities to create data sets, train, and test models.
A second approach, learning algorithm-driven, prioritizes learning about how the learning algorithms or engines behind how ML models work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T17:37:21Z) - Tuning-Free Accountable Intervention for LLM Deployment -- A
Metacognitive Approach [55.613461060997004]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have catalyzed transformative advances across a spectrum of natural language processing tasks.
We propose an innovative textitmetacognitive approach, dubbed textbfCLEAR, to equip LLMs with capabilities for self-aware error identification and correction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T19:18:53Z) - Mathematical Algorithm Design for Deep Learning under Societal and
Judicial Constraints: The Algorithmic Transparency Requirement [65.26723285209853]
We derive a framework to analyze whether a transparent implementation in a computing model is feasible.
Based on previous results, we find that Blum-Shub-Smale Machines have the potential to establish trustworthy solvers for inverse problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-18T15:32:38Z) - Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and
Using Uncertainty [66.17147341354577]
We argue for considering a complementary form of transparency by estimating and communicating the uncertainty associated with model predictions.
We describe how uncertainty can be used to mitigate model unfairness, augment decision-making, and build trustworthy systems.
This work constitutes an interdisciplinary review drawn from literature spanning machine learning, visualization/HCI, design, decision-making, and fairness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-15T17:26:14Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.