Explainability Assistant: A Conversational XAI Interface for Interpreting Energy Consumption Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11860v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 17:40:11 GMT
• Title: Explainability Assistant: A Conversational XAI Interface for Interpreting Energy Consumption Models
• Abstract summary: Energy consumption forecasting relies on increasingly complex machine learning (ML) models.<n>Traditional Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques address this opacity, but traditional XAI dashboards require substantial technical expertise.<n>This paper introduces the Explainability Assistant, an open-source conversational XAI system.<n>The system achieves 94% intent-parsing accuracy, supports flexible natural language interaction, and adapts to different ML problem types without task-specific fine-tuning.
• Score: 0.4499833362998488
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Energy consumption forecasting relies on increasingly complex machine learning (ML) models, such as Genetic Programming-based symbolic regressors, whose predictions can be difficult for facility managers and building operators to interpret. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques address this opacity, but traditional XAI dashboards require substantial technical expertise and provide limited flexibility for dynamic, context-aware inquiry. Conversational XAI systems offer a promising alternative; however, previous approaches, such as TalkToModel, were constrained by rigid custom grammars and achieved only 76.8% intent-parsing accuracy. This paper introduces the Explainability Assistant, an open-source conversational XAI system that leverages the function-calling capabilities of modern Large Language Models (LLMs) to overcome these limitations. The system achieves 94% intent-parsing accuracy, supports flexible natural language interaction, and adapts to different ML problem types without task-specific fine-tuning. We present the system's architecture and report results from a comparative evaluation conducted with energy domain specialists, contrasting the Explainability Assistant with a traditional XAI dashboard. The evaluation suggests improved usability and consistent task accuracy, with all experts unanimously preferring the conversational interface for practical use.

Related papers

• Generative Explainability for Next-Generation Networks: LLM-Augmented XAI with Mutual Feature Interactions [1.139115821799478]
  Existing explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques often fail to bridge this gap for non-specialists.<n>This paper presents a framework specifically designed to address this shortcoming.<n>It employs a structured prompt enriched with mutual feature interaction data to generate human-understandable natural language explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T14:48:26Z)
• Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions [95.59915390053588]
  This study focuses on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches-focusing on deep neural networks (DNNs) and large language models (LLMs)<n>We discuss critical symptoms that stem from deeper root causes (i.e., two paradoxes, two conceptual confusions, and five false assumptions)<n>To move beyond XAI's limitations, we propose a four-pronged paradigm shift toward reliable and certified AI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T16:58:27Z)
• Beyond single-model XAI: aggregating multi-model explanations for enhanced trustworthiness [43.25173443756643]
  This paper investigates the role of robustness through the usage of a feature importance aggregation derived from multiple models.<n>Preliminary results showcase the potential in increasing the trustworthiness of the application, while leveraging multiple model's predictive power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T08:55:45Z)
• Generative Interfaces for Language Models [70.25765232527762]
  We propose a paradigm in which large language models (LLMs) respond to user queries by proactively generating user interfaces (UIs)<n>Our framework leverages structured interface-specific representations and iterative refinements to translate user queries into task-specific UIs.<n>Results show that generative interfaces consistently outperform conversational ones, with up to a 72% improvement in human preference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T17:43:20Z)
• Measuring User Understanding in Dialogue-based XAI Systems [2.4124106640519667]
  State-of-the-art in XAI is still characterized by one-shot, non-personalized and one-way explanations. In this paper, we measure understanding of users in three phases by asking them to simulate the predictions of the model they are learning about. We analyze the data to reveal patterns of how the interaction between groups with high vs. low understanding gain differ.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T15:17:03Z)
• SCENE: Evaluating Explainable AI Techniques Using Soft Counterfactuals [0.0]
  This paper introduces SCENE (Soft Counterfactual Evaluation for Natural language Explainability), a novel evaluation method. By focusing on token-based substitutions, SCENE creates contextually appropriate and semantically meaningful Soft Counterfactuals. SCENE provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of various XAI techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T16:36:24Z)
• XEdgeAI: A Human-centered Industrial Inspection Framework with Data-centric Explainable Edge AI Approach [2.0209172586699173]
  This paper introduces a novel XAI-integrated Visual Quality Inspection framework. Our framework incorporates XAI and the Large Vision Language Model to deliver human-centered interpretability. This approach paves the way for the broader adoption of reliable and interpretable AI tools in critical industrial applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T14:30:24Z)
• Usable XAI: 10 Strategies Towards Exploiting Explainability in the LLM Era [76.12435556140515]
  XAI is being extended toward explaining Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>This paper analyzes how XAI can explain and improve LLM-based AI systems.<n>We introduce 10 strategies, introducing the key techniques for each and discussing their associated challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T20:25:27Z)
• XAI for All: Can Large Language Models Simplify Explainable AI? [0.0699049312989311]
  "x-[plAIn]" is a new approach to make XAI more accessible to a wider audience through a custom Large Language Model. Our goal was to design a model that can generate clear, concise summaries of various XAI methods. Results from our use-case studies show that our model is effective in providing easy-to-understand, audience-specific explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T21:47:12Z)
• How much informative is your XAI? A decision-making assessment task to objectively measure the goodness of explanations [53.01494092422942]
  The number and complexity of personalised and user-centred approaches to XAI have rapidly grown in recent years. It emerged that user-centred approaches to XAI positively affect the interaction between users and systems. We propose an assessment task to objectively and quantitatively measure the goodness of XAI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T15:49:39Z)
• Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual Explanations (XAI) [68.8204255655161]
  The emphasis of XAI research appears to have turned to a more pragmatic explanation approach for better understanding. An extensive area where cognitive science research may substantially influence XAI advancements is evaluating user knowledge and feedback. We propose a framework to experiment with generating and evaluating the explanations on the grounds of different cognitive levels of understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T19:20:22Z)
• Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AI [65.44737844681256]
  A lack of consensus on how to evaluate explainable AI (XAI) hinders the advancement of the field. We argue that one way to close the gap is to develop evaluation methods that account for different user requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T05:17:33Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.