CIG-MIA: Context-Induced Information Gain Membership Inference Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14649v1
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 16:34:57 GMT
- Title: CIG-MIA: Context-Induced Information Gain Membership Inference Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- Abstract summary: This paper studies knowledge base membership inference against RAG systems under both gray-box and text-only black-box access.<n>We introduce CIG-MIA, a membership inference attack based on context-induced information gain.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems ground large language models on external knowledge bases, enabling access to private, domain-specific, and up-to-date knowledge without retraining. However, the same retrieval interface can expose whether a candidate document is contained in the knowledge base. This paper studies knowledge base membership inference against RAG systems under both gray-box and text-only black-box access. Existing RAG membership inference attacks rely on signals such as direct membership prompts, response similarity, mask recovery, or query perturbation, which can be sensitive to prompt defenses, semantically related retrieved documents, and the generator's parametric knowledge. We introduce CIG-MIA, a membership inference attack based on context-induced information gain. The key insight is that explicit candidate-document injection affects members and non-members differently: if a document is already available through retrieval, injection provides little additional support for document-derived answers; if it is absent, injection introduces new evidence and yields a larger likelihood gain. In the gray-box setting, CIG-MIA computes this gain directly from token-level likelihoods. In the black-box setting, it estimates the same gain from generated text by scoring selected answer tokens with a lightweight surrogate-based estimator using semantic similarity and exact-match features. We evaluate CIG-MIA on Natural Questions, MS-MARCO, and HealthCareMagic against recent RAG membership inference baselines. On Natural Questions, CIG-MIA achieves an AUC of 0.99 in the gray-box setting and 0.93 in the black-box setting. We further analyze the information-gain signal, RAG configuration effects, ablations, and robustness to paraphrasing and generation randomness.
Related papers
- E-MIA: Exam-Style Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks against RAG Systems [4.305347927600694]
We propose E-MIA, which converts verifiable hard evidence in the target document into an exam with four objectively gradable question types.<n>E-MIA improves member/non-member separability in stringent settings while preserving natural, stealthy queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-01T12:30:00Z) - AdversarialCoT: Single-Document Retrieval Poisoning for LLM Reasoning [115.3243260783674]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language model (LLM) reasoning by retrieving external documents.<n>We study knowledge-base poisoning attacks in RAG, where an attacker injects malicious content into the retrieval corpus.<n>We propose AdversarialCoT, a query-specific attack that poisons only a single document in the corpus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T02:10:23Z) - ReAG: Reasoning-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering [54.72902502486611]
ReAG is a Reasoning-Augmented Multimodal RAG approach that combines coarse- and fine-grained retrieval with a critic model that filters irrelevant passages.<n>ReAG significantly outperforms prior methods, improving answer accuracy and providing interpretable reasoning grounded in retrieved evidence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T19:01:02Z) - SMA: Who Said That? Auditing Membership Leakage in Semi-Black-box RAG Controlling [50.66950115630554]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and its Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MRAG) significantly improve the knowledge coverage and contextual understanding of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>However, retrieval and multimodal fusion obscure content provenance, rendering existing membership inference methods unable to reliably attribute generated outputs to pre-training, external retrieval, or user input, thus undermining privacy leakage accountability.<n>We propose the first Source-aware Membership Audit (SMA) that enables fine-grained source attribution of generated content in a semi-black-box setting with retrieval control capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-12T17:32:24Z) - Fine-Grained Privacy Extraction from Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems via Knowledge Asymmetry Exploitation [15.985529058573912]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems enhance large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge bases.<n>Existing privacy attacks on RAG systems can trigger data leakage but often fail to accurately isolate knowledge-base-derived sentences within mixed responses.<n>This paper presents a novel black-box attack framework that exploits knowledge asymmetry between RAG and standard LLMs to achieve fine-grained privacy extraction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-31T03:50:16Z) - Riddle Me This! Stealthy Membership Inference for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [18.098228823748617]
We present Interrogation Attack (IA), a membership inference technique targeting documents in the RAG datastore.<n>We demonstrate successful inference with just 30 queries while remaining stealthy.<n>We observe a 2x improvement in TPR@1%FPR over prior inference attacks across diverse RAG configurations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-01T04:01:18Z) - Mask-based Membership Inference Attacks for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [25.516648802281626]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has been an effective approach to mitigate hallucinations in large language models (LLMs)<n>Recently, there has been a trend storing up-to-date or copyrighted data in RAG knowledge databases instead of using it for LLM training.<n>This practice has raised concerns about Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs), which aim to detect if a specific target document is stored in the RAG system's knowledge database.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-26T10:43:39Z) - RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z) - Generating Is Believing: Membership Inference Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Generation [9.73190366574692]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique that mitigates issues such as hallucinations and knowledge staleness in Large Language Models (LLMs)
Existing research has demonstrated potential privacy risks associated with the LLMs of RAG.
We present S$2$MIA, a underlineMembership underlineInference underlineAttack that utilizes the underlineSemantic underlineSimilarity between a given sample and the content generated by the RAG system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T14:58:38Z) - ReCaLL: Membership Inference via Relative Conditional Log-Likelihoods [56.073335779595475]
We propose ReCaLL (Relative Conditional Log-Likelihood) to detect pretraining data by leveraging conditional language modeling capabilities.<n>Our empirical findings show that conditioning member data on non-member prefixes induces a larger decrease in log-likelihood compared to non-member data.<n>We conduct comprehensive experiments and show that ReCaLL achieves state-of-the-art performance on the WikiMIA dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-23T00:23:13Z) - Merging Generated and Retrieved Knowledge for Open-Domain QA [72.42262579925911]
COMBO is a compatibility-Oriented knowledge Merging for Better Open-domain QA framework.
We show that COMBO outperforms competitive baselines on three out of four tested open-domain QA benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-22T19:37:06Z) - Attribute Inference Attack of Speech Emotion Recognition in Federated
Learning Settings [56.93025161787725]
Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning paradigm that coordinates clients to train a model collaboratively without sharing local data.
We propose an attribute inference attack framework that infers sensitive attribute information of the clients from shared gradients or model parameters.
We show that the attribute inference attack is achievable for SER systems trained using FL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-26T16:50:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.