Integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Large Language Models for Transparent Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16779v1
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 07:47:04 GMT
- Title: Integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Large Language Models for Transparent Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
- Abstract summary: This study examines the decision-making capabilities of LLMs through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)<n>We construct a new annotated benchmark based on AHP and propose the first end-to-end approach that enables LLMs to perform the complete AHP workflow.<n> Experiments in real-world decision problems in the legal and higher-education ranking domains show that our method significantly improves alignment with expert judgments.
- Score: 4.86435280701716
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: LLMs are increasingly employed in a wide range of decision-making tasks. However, the opacity of their internal reasoning makes it difficult to validate or interpret their outputs, and the need for interpretability becomes especially critical in high-stakes settings. This study examines the decision-making capabilities of LLMs through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a classical and widely used multicriteria decision-making framework. We construct a new annotated benchmark based on AHP and propose the first end-to-end approach that enables LLMs to perform the complete AHP workflow. Experiments in real-world decision problems in the legal and higher-education ranking domains show that our method significantly improves alignment with expert judgments.
Related papers
- Doc2AHP: Inferring Structured Multi-Criteria Decision Models via Semantic Trees with LLMs [7.026862437055361]
We propose Doc2AHP, a novel structured inference framework guided by AHP principles.<n>We introduce a multi-agent weighting mechanism coupled with an adaptive consistency optimization strategy to ensure the numerical consistency of weight allocation.<n> Empirical results demonstrate that Doc2AHP not only empowers non-expert users to construct high-quality decision models from scratch but also significantly outperforms direct generative baselines in both logical completeness and downstream task accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-23T06:20:23Z) - Increasing AI Explainability by LLM Driven Standard Processes [0.0]
This paper introduces an approach to increasing the explainability of artificial intelligence (AI) systems by embedding Large Language Models (LLMs) within standardized analytical processes.<n>A layered architecture is presented that separates the reasoning space of the LLM from the explainable process space above it.<n> Empirical evaluations show that the system can reproduce human-level decision logic in decentralized governance, systems analysis, and strategic reasoning contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-10T13:16:10Z) - Beyond Majority Voting: LLM Aggregation by Leveraging Higher-Order Information [57.397381631496906]
We develop two new aggregation algorithms called Optimal Weight (OW) and Inverse Surprising Popularity (ISP)<n>Our theoretical analysis shows these methods provably mitigate inherent limitations of majority voting under mild assumptions.<n>We empirically validate our algorithms on synthetic datasets, popular LLM fine-tuning benchmarks such as UltraFeedback and MMLU, and a real-world healthcare setting ARMMAN.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T22:21:50Z) - Feedback-Induced Performance Decline in LLM-Based Decision-Making [6.5990946334144756]
Large Language Models (LLMs) can extract context from natural language problem descriptions.<n>This paper studies the behaviour of these models within a Markov Decision Process (MDPs)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-20T10:38:56Z) - Enhancing Decision-Making of Large Language Models via Actor-Critic [28.870961806283425]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in natural language processing tasks.<n>Existing methods either rely on short-term auto-regressive action generation or face limitations in accurately simulating rollouts and assessing outcomes.<n>This paper introduces a novel LLM-based Actor-Critic framework, termed LAC, that effectively improves LLM policies with long-term action evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-04T14:58:27Z) - An Empirical Study of Conformal Prediction in LLM with ASP Scaffolds for Robust Reasoning [52.29223403698673]
This paper examines the use of Conformal Language Modelling (CLM) alongside Answer Set Programming (ASP)<n>We apply CLM to generate sets of ASP programs from an LLM, providing statistical guarantees on the correctness of the outputs.<n> Experimental results show that CLM significantly outperforms baseline models that use standard sampling methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T14:10:10Z) - Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making [85.24399869971236]
We aim to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) for embodied decision making.<n>Existing evaluations tend to rely solely on a final success rate.<n>We propose a generalized interface (Embodied Agent Interface) that supports the formalization of various types of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T17:59:00Z) - EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For In-Context Exploration [76.66831821738927]
Large language models (LLMs) remain under-studied in scenarios requiring optimal decision-making under uncertainty.<n>We measure LLMs' (in)ability to make optimal decisions in bandits, a state-less reinforcement learning setting relevant to many applications.<n>Motivated by the existence of optimal exploration algorithms, we propose efficient ways to integrate this algorithmic knowledge into LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T17:54:03Z) - Enhancing Decision-Making in Optimization through LLM-Assisted Inference: A Neural Networks Perspective [1.0420394952839245]
This paper explores the seamless integration of Generative AI (GenAI) and Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs)
Focusing on the transformative role of Large Language Models (LLMs), our study investigates the potential of LLM-Assisted Inference to automate and enhance decision-making processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-12T08:22:53Z) - LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights [62.92811060490876]
Large Language Model (LLM) inference is rapidly evolving, presenting a unique blend of opportunities and challenges.
Our survey stands out from traditional literature reviews by not only summarizing the current state of research but also by introducing a framework based on roofline model.
This framework identifies the bottlenecks when deploying LLMs on hardware devices and provides a clear understanding of practical problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T07:33:05Z) - Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration [83.4031923134958]
Corex is a suite of novel general-purpose strategies that transform Large Language Models into autonomous agents.
Inspired by human behaviors, Corex is constituted by diverse collaboration paradigms including Debate, Review, and Retrieve modes.
We demonstrate that orchestrating multiple LLMs to work in concert yields substantially better performance compared to existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-30T07:11:39Z) - Rational Decision-Making Agent with Internalized Utility Judgment [88.01612847081677]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable advancements and have attracted significant efforts to develop LLMs into agents capable of executing intricate multi-step decision-making tasks beyond traditional NLP applications.<n>This paper proposes RadAgent, which fosters the development of its rationality through an iterative framework involving Experience Exploration and Utility Learning.<n> Experimental results on the ToolBench dataset demonstrate RadAgent's superiority over baselines, achieving over 10% improvement in Pass Rate on diverse tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-24T03:11:45Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.