Beyond Measurement Metrics: A Human-Centered Framework for Semantic Validation of Network Traffic Classification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17014v1
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:24:12 GMT
- Title: Beyond Measurement Metrics: A Human-Centered Framework for Semantic Validation of Network Traffic Classification
- Abstract summary: We adapt the knowledge generation framework for network traffic classification.<n>The adapted framework combines data, ML models, explainability, visualization, and expert reasoning.<n>By complementing predictive performance with semantic validation and human expertise, the proposed framework supports the development of network traffic classification models.
- Score: 2.8055179094637688
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Machine learning (ML) has become the dominant approach for network traffic classification, achieving very high predictive performance. However, a model is only valuable if it learns semantically meaningful and trustworthy patterns rather than exploiting spurious correlations. Conventional evaluation practices predominantly assess predictive performance. Consequently, whether the model relies on semantically meaningful patterns remains unknown. To address these challenges, we adapt the knowledge generation framework for network traffic classification. The adapted framework combines data, ML models, explainability, visualization, and expert reasoning to support the iterative exploration, verification, and refinement of model behavior and data preprocessing. The framework is grounded in findings from the literature, benchmark dataset analyses, practical experience with XAI-based traffic classification, and expert feedback, providing practical guidance for semantic model validation. By complementing predictive performance with semantic validation and human expertise, the proposed framework supports the development of network traffic classification models that are not only accurate but also robust and trustworthy.
Related papers
- Large Vision-Language Models Get Lost in Attention [51.851592109135716]
We propose a unified framework grounded in information theory and geometry to quantify the geometric and entropic nature of residual updates.<n>Applying this unified framework reveals a fundamental functional decoupling: Attention acts as a subspace-language operator focused on reconfiguration, whereas FFNs serve as subspace-language operators driving semantic innovation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T04:45:52Z) - Dual-Teacher Distillation with Subnetwork Rectification for Black-Box Domain Adaptation [69.7036779439312]
Black box domain adaptation represents a highly practical yet extremely challenging setting.<n>We propose a dual teacher distillation with subnetwork rectification (DDSR) model that exploits specific knowledge embedded in black box source models.<n>Our approach demonstrates consistent improvements over state of the art methods, including those using source data or models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-24T07:54:19Z) - Provenance Networks: End-to-End Exemplar-Based Explainability [0.0]
We introduce provenance networks, a novel class of neural models designed to provide end-to-end, training-data-driven explainability.<n>Provenance networks learn to link each prediction directly to its supporting training examples as part of the model's normal operation.<n>It addresses critical challenges in modern deep learning, including model opaqueness, hallucination, and the assignment of credit to data contributors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-03T01:48:38Z) - Analysis of Transferability Estimation Metrics for Surgical Phase Recognition [3.3285108719932555]
Fine-tuning pre-trained models has become a cornerstone of modern machine learning, allowing practitioners to achieve high performance with limited labeled data.<n>In surgical video analysis, where expert annotations are especially time-consuming and costly, identifying the most suitable pre-trained model for a downstream task is both critical and challenging.<n>We provide the first comprehensive benchmark of three representative metrics, LogME, H-Score, and TransRate, on two diverse datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-22T18:05:33Z) - Understanding GUI Agent Localization Biases through Logit Sharpness [15.986679553468989]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have enabled GUI agents to interact with operating systems by grounding language into spatial actions.<n>Despite their promising performance, these models frequently exhibit hallucinations-systematic localization errors that compromise reliability.<n>We propose a fine-grained evaluation framework that categorizes model predictions into four distinct types, revealing nuanced failure modes beyond traditional accuracy metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-18T12:55:35Z) - Neural Network Reprogrammability: A Unified Theme on Model Reprogramming, Prompt Tuning, and Prompt Instruction [57.19302613163439]
We introduce neural network reprogrammability as a unifying framework for model adaptation.<n>We present a taxonomy that categorizes such information manipulation approaches across four key dimensions.<n>We also analyze remaining technical challenges and ethical considerations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T05:42:27Z) - Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Encrypted Traffic Using SHAP with Machine Learning Models [0.0]
This study aims to develop an interpretable machine learning-based framework for anomaly detection in encrypted network traffic.<n>Models are trained and evaluated on three benchmark encrypted traffic datasets.<n> SHAP visualizations successfully revealed the most influential traffic features contributing to anomaly predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T05:50:39Z) - QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement.
QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights.
We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z) - Exploring validation metrics for offline model-based optimisation with
diffusion models [50.404829846182764]
In model-based optimisation (MBO) we are interested in using machine learning to design candidates that maximise some measure of reward with respect to a black box function called the (ground truth) oracle.
While an approximation to the ground oracle can be trained and used in place of it during model validation to measure the mean reward over generated candidates, the evaluation is approximate and vulnerable to adversarial examples.
This is encapsulated under our proposed evaluation framework which is also designed to measure extrapolation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-19T16:57:37Z) - Vehicle Behavior Prediction and Generalization Using Imbalanced Learning
Techniques [1.3381749415517017]
This paper proposes an interaction-aware prediction model consisting of an LSTM autoencoder and SVM classifier.
Evaluations show that the method enhances model performance, resulting in improved classification accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-22T11:21:20Z) - Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Model [56.44269917346376]
We show how a sequence-to-sequence model can be trained to generate relevance labels as "target words"
Our approach significantly outperforms an encoder-only model in a data-poor regime.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-14T22:29:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.