Comparison of Statistical and Machine Learning Techniques for Physical Layer Authentication

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.06238v2
• Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:11:23 GMT
• Title: Comparison of Statistical and Machine Learning Techniques for Physical Layer Authentication
• Abstract summary: We consider authentication at the physical layer, in which the authenticator aims at distinguishing a legitimate supplicant from an attacker. We first consider the use of two different statistical decision methods, and we prove that using a large number of references affected by different levels of time-varying fading is not beneficial from a security point of view.
• Score: 12.154451826265314
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this paper we consider authentication at the physical layer, in which the authenticator aims at distinguishing a legitimate supplicant from an attacker on the basis of the characteristics of a set of parallel wireless channels, which are affected by time-varying fading. Moreover, the attacker's channel has a spatial correlation with the supplicant's one. In this setting, we assess and compare the performance achieved by different approaches under different channel conditions. We first consider the use of two different statistical decision methods, and we prove that using a large number of references (in the form of channel estimates) affected by different levels of time-varying fading is not beneficial from a security point of view. We then consider classification methods based on machine learning. In order to face the worst case scenario of an authenticator provided with no forged messages during training, we consider one-class classifiers. When instead the training set includes some forged messages, we resort to more conventional binary classifiers, considering the cases in which such messages are either labelled or not. For the latter case, we exploit clustering algorithms to label the training set. The performance of both nearest neighbor (NN) and support vector machine (SVM) classification techniques is evaluated. Through numerical examples, we show that under the same probability of false alarm, one-class classification (OCC) algorithms achieve the lowest probability of missed detection when a small spatial correlation exists between the main channel and the adversary one, while statistical methods are advantageous when the spatial correlation between the two channels is large.

Related papers

• Collaborative Feature-Logits Contrastive Learning for Open-Set Semi-Supervised Object Detection [75.02249869573994]
  In open-set scenarios, the unlabeled dataset contains both in-distribution (ID) classes and out-of-distribution (OOD) classes. Applying semi-supervised detectors in such settings can lead to misclassifying OOD class as ID classes. We propose a simple yet effective method, termed Collaborative Feature-Logits Detector (CFL-Detector)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T02:57:35Z)
• An Adversarial Approach to Evaluating the Robustness of Event Identification Models [12.862865254507179]
  This paper considers a physics-based modal decomposition method to extract features for event classification. The resulting classifiers are tested against an adversarial algorithm to evaluate their robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T18:11:37Z)
• An Upper Bound for the Distribution Overlap Index and Its Applications [18.481370450591317]
  This paper proposes an easy-to-compute upper bound for the overlap index between two probability distributions. The proposed bound shows its value in one-class classification and domain shift analysis. Our work shows significant promise toward broadening the applications of overlap-based metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-16T20:02:03Z)
• Compare learning: bi-attention network for few-shot learning [6.559037166322981]
  One of the Few-shot learning methods called metric learning addresses this challenge by first learning a deep distance metric to determine whether a pair of images belong to the same category. In this paper, we propose a novel approach named Bi-attention network to compare the instances, which can measure the similarity between embeddings of instances precisely, globally and efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T07:39:10Z)
• Post-Training Detection of Backdoor Attacks for Two-Class and Multi-Attack Scenarios [22.22337220509128]
  Backdoor attacks (BAs) are an emerging threat to deep neural network classifiers. We propose a detection framework based on BP reverse-engineering and a novel it expected transferability (ET) statistic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-20T22:21:38Z)
• Prototypical Classifier for Robust Class-Imbalanced Learning [64.96088324684683]
  We propose textitPrototypical, which does not require fitting additional parameters given the embedding network. Prototypical produces balanced and comparable predictions for all classes even though the training set is class-imbalanced. We test our method on CIFAR-10LT, CIFAR-100LT and Webvision datasets, observing that Prototypical obtains substaintial improvements compared with state of the arts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T01:55:01Z)
• Learning and Evaluating Representations for Deep One-class Classification [59.095144932794646]
  We present a two-stage framework for deep one-class classification. We first learn self-supervised representations from one-class data, and then build one-class classifiers on learned representations. In experiments, we demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on visual domain one-class classification benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T23:33:41Z)
• Beyond cross-entropy: learning highly separable feature distributions for robust and accurate classification [22.806324361016863]
  We propose a novel approach for training deep robust multiclass classifiers that provides adversarial robustness. We show that the regularization of the latent space based on our approach yields excellent classification accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-29T11:15:17Z)
• Joint Visual and Temporal Consistency for Unsupervised Domain Adaptive Person Re-Identification [64.37745443119942]
  This paper jointly enforces visual and temporal consistency in the combination of a local one-hot classification and a global multi-class classification. Experimental results on three large-scale ReID datasets demonstrate the superiority of proposed method in both unsupervised and unsupervised domain adaptive ReID tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T14:31:27Z)
• ReMarNet: Conjoint Relation and Margin Learning for Small-Sample Image Classification [49.87503122462432]
  We introduce a novel neural network termed Relation-and-Margin learning Network (ReMarNet) Our method assembles two networks of different backbones so as to learn the features that can perform excellently in both of the aforementioned two classification mechanisms. Experiments on four image datasets demonstrate that our approach is effective in learning discriminative features from a small set of labeled samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-27T13:50:20Z)
• Certified Robustness to Label-Flipping Attacks via Randomized Smoothing [105.91827623768724]
  Machine learning algorithms are susceptible to data poisoning attacks. We present a unifying view of randomized smoothing over arbitrary functions. We propose a new strategy for building classifiers that are pointwise-certifiably robust to general data poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-07T21:28:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.