Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Early Prediction of Mortality in Elderly Patients with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS): a Multicenter Retrospective Study and Cross Validation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.10977v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 17:15:34 GMT
• Title: Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Early Prediction of Mortality in Elderly Patients with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS): a Multicenter Retrospective Study and Cross Validation
• Authors: Xiaoli Liu, Pan Hu, Zhi Mao, Po-Chih Kuo, Peiyao Li, Chao Liu, Jie Hu, Deyu Li, Desen Cao, Roger G. Mark, Leo Anthony Celi, Zhengbo Zhang, Feihu Zhou
• Abstract summary: Elderly patients with MODS have high risk of death and poor prognosis. This study aims to develop an interpretable and generalizable model for early mortality prediction in elderly patients with MODS.
• Score: 9.808639780672156
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Background: Elderly patients with MODS have high risk of death and poor prognosis. The performance of current scoring systems assessing the severity of MODS and its mortality remains unsatisfactory. This study aims to develop an interpretable and generalizable model for early mortality prediction in elderly patients with MODS. Methods: The MIMIC-III, eICU-CRD and PLAGH-S databases were employed for model generation and evaluation. We used the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model with the SHapley Additive exPlanations method to conduct early and interpretable predictions of patients' hospital outcome. Three types of data source combinations and five typical evaluation indexes were adopted to develop a generalizable model. Findings: The interpretable model, with optimal performance developed by using MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD datasets, was separately validated in MIMIC-III, eICU-CRD and PLAGH-S datasets (no overlapping with training set). The performances of the model in predicting hospital mortality as validated by the three datasets were: AUC of 0.858, sensitivity of 0.834 and specificity of 0.705; AUC of 0.849, sensitivity of 0.763 and specificity of 0.784; and AUC of 0.838, sensitivity of 0.882 and specificity of 0.691, respectively. Comparisons of AUC between this model and baseline models with MIMIC-III dataset validation showed superior performances of this model; In addition, comparisons in AUC between this model and commonly used clinical scores showed significantly better performance of this model. Interpretation: The interpretable machine learning model developed in this study using fused datasets with large sample sizes was robust and generalizable. This model outperformed the baseline models and several clinical scores for early prediction of mortality in elderly ICU patients. The interpretative nature of this model provided clinicians with the ranking of mortality risk features.

Related papers

• CRTRE: Causal Rule Generation with Target Trial Emulation Framework [47.2836994469923]
  We introduce a novel method called causal rule generation with target trial emulation framework (CRTRE) CRTRE applies randomize trial design principles to estimate the causal effect of association rules. We then incorporate such association rules for the downstream applications such as prediction of disease onsets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-10T02:40:06Z)
• Optimizing Mortality Prediction for ICU Heart Failure Patients: Leveraging XGBoost and Advanced Machine Learning with the MIMIC-III Database [1.5186937600119894]
  Heart failure affects millions of people worldwide, significantly reducing quality of life and leading to high mortality rates. Despite extensive research, the relationship between heart failure and mortality rates among ICU patients is not fully understood. This study analyzed data from 1,177 patients over 18 years old from the MIMIC-III database, identified using ICD-9 codes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T07:57:08Z)
• Advanced Predictive Modeling for Enhanced Mortality Prediction in ICU Stroke Patients Using Clinical Data [0.0]
  Stroke is second-leading cause of disability and death among adults. Approximately 17 million people suffer from a stroke annually, with about 85% being ischemic strokes. We developed a deep learning model to assess mortality risk and implemented several baseline machine learning models for comparison.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T11:17:42Z)
• Comprehensive Multimodal Deep Learning Survival Prediction Enabled by a Transformer Architecture: A Multicenter Study in Glioblastoma [4.578027879885667]
  This research aims to improve glioblastoma survival prediction by integrating MR images, clinical and molecular-pathologic data in a transformer-based deep learning model. The model employs self-supervised learning techniques to effectively encode the high-dimensional MRI input for integration with non-imaging data using cross-attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T17:44:48Z)
• The effect of data augmentation and 3D-CNN depth on Alzheimer's Disease detection [51.697248252191265]
  This work summarizes and strictly observes best practices regarding data handling, experimental design, and model evaluation. We focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection, which serves as a paradigmatic example of challenging problem in healthcare. Within this framework, we train predictive 15 models, considering three different data augmentation strategies and five distinct 3D CNN architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T10:40:41Z)
• Clinical Deterioration Prediction in Brazilian Hospitals Based on Artificial Neural Networks and Tree Decision Models [56.93322937189087]
  An extremely boosted neural network (XBNet) is used to predict clinical deterioration (CD) The XGBoost model obtained the best results in predicting CD among Brazilian hospitals' data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-17T23:29:14Z)
• On the explainability of hospitalization prediction on a large COVID-19 patient dataset [45.82374977939355]
  We develop various AI models to predict hospitalization on a large (over 110$k$) cohort of COVID-19 positive-tested US patients. Despite high data unbalance, the models reach average precision 0.96-0.98 (0.75-0.85), recall 0.96-0.98 (0.74-0.85), and $F_score 0.97-0.98 (0.79-0.83) on the non-hospitalized (or hospitalized) class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-28T10:23:38Z)
• A multi-stage machine learning model on diagnosis of esophageal manometry [50.591267188664666]
  The framework includes deep-learning models at the swallow-level stage and feature-based machine learning models at the study-level stage. This is the first artificial-intelligence-style model to automatically predict CC diagnosis of HRM study from raw multi-swallow data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T20:09:23Z)
• Deep learning-based COVID-19 pneumonia classification using chest CT images: model generalizability [54.86482395312936]
  Deep learning (DL) classification models were trained to identify COVID-19-positive patients on 3D computed tomography (CT) datasets from different countries. We trained nine identical DL-based classification models by using combinations of the datasets with a 72% train, 8% validation, and 20% test data split. The models trained on multiple datasets and evaluated on a test set from one of the datasets used for training performed better.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-18T21:14:52Z)
• A Physiology-Driven Computational Model for Post-Cardiac Arrest Outcome Prediction [0.7930054475711718]
  The aim of this study was to build computational models to predict post-CA outcome. We hypothesized that model performance could be enhanced by integrating physiological time series (PTS) data and by training machine learning (ML) classifiers. Results attest to the effectiveness of ML models for post-CA predictive modeling and suggest that PTS recorded in very early phase after resuscitation encode short-term outcome probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-09T07:53:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.