Integrating Active Learning in Causal Inference with Interference: A Novel Approach in Online Experiments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12710v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 04:13:59 GMT
• Title: Integrating Active Learning in Causal Inference with Interference: A Novel Approach in Online Experiments
• Authors: Hongtao Zhu, Sizhe Zhang, Yang Su, Zhenyu Zhao, Nan Chen
• Abstract summary: We introduce an active learning approach: Active Learning in Causal Inference with Interference (ACI) ACI uses Gaussian process to flexibly model the direct and spillover treatment effects as a function of a continuous measure of neighbors' treatment assignment. We demonstrate its feasibility in achieving accurate effects estimations with reduced data requirements.
• Score: 5.488412825534217
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In the domain of causal inference research, the prevalent potential outcomes framework, notably the Rubin Causal Model (RCM), often overlooks individual interference and assumes independent treatment effects. This assumption, however, is frequently misaligned with the intricate realities of real-world scenarios, where interference is not merely a possibility but a common occurrence. Our research endeavors to address this discrepancy by focusing on the estimation of direct and spillover treatment effects under two assumptions: (1) network-based interference, where treatments on neighbors within connected networks affect one's outcomes, and (2) non-random treatment assignments influenced by confounders. To improve the efficiency of estimating potentially complex effects functions, we introduce an novel active learning approach: Active Learning in Causal Inference with Interference (ACI). This approach uses Gaussian process to flexibly model the direct and spillover treatment effects as a function of a continuous measure of neighbors' treatment assignment. The ACI framework sequentially identifies the experimental settings that demand further data. It further optimizes the treatment assignments under the network interference structure using genetic algorithms to achieve efficient learning outcome. By applying our method to simulation data and a Tencent game dataset, we demonstrate its feasibility in achieving accurate effects estimations with reduced data requirements. This ACI approach marks a significant advancement in the realm of data efficiency for causal inference, offering a robust and efficient alternative to traditional methodologies, particularly in scenarios characterized by complex interference patterns.

Related papers

• Higher-Order Causal Message Passing for Experimentation with Complex Interference [6.092214762701847]
  We introduce a new class of estimators based on causal message-passing, specifically designed for settings with pervasive, unknown interference. Our estimator draws on information from the sample mean and variance of unit outcomes and treatments over time, enabling efficient use of observed data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T18:00:51Z)
• Estimating Direct and Indirect Causal Effects of Spatiotemporal Interventions in Presence of Spatial Interference [0.46052594866569146]
  We first extend the concept of spatial interference in case of time-varying treatment outcomes by extending the potential outcome framework under the assumption of no unmeasured confounding. We then propose our deep learning based potential outcome model fortemporal causal inference. We utilize latent factor modeling to reduce interference due to time-varying confounding while leveraging the power of U-Net architecture to capture global spatial interference in data over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T20:39:27Z)
• Causal Message Passing for Experiments with Unknown and General Network Interference [5.294604210205507]
  We introduce a new framework to accommodate complex and unknown network interference. Our framework, termed causal message-passing, is grounded in high-dimensional approximate message passing methodology. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach across five numerical scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T17:31:50Z)
• Benchmarking Bayesian Causal Discovery Methods for Downstream Treatment Effect Estimation [137.3520153445413]
  A notable gap exists in the evaluation of causal discovery methods, where insufficient emphasis is placed on downstream inference. We evaluate seven established baseline causal discovery methods including a newly proposed method based on GFlowNets. The results of our study demonstrate that some of the algorithms studied are able to effectively capture a wide range of useful and diverse ATE modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T02:58:10Z)
• B-Learner: Quasi-Oracle Bounds on Heterogeneous Causal Effects Under Hidden Confounding [51.74479522965712]
  We propose a meta-learner called the B-Learner, which can efficiently learn sharp bounds on the CATE function under limits on hidden confounding. We prove its estimates are valid, sharp, efficient, and have a quasi-oracle property with respect to the constituent estimators under more general conditions than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T18:07:19Z)
• CausalBench: A Large-scale Benchmark for Network Inference from Single-cell Perturbation Data [61.088705993848606]
  We introduce CausalBench, a benchmark suite for evaluating causal inference methods on real-world interventional data. CaulBench incorporates biologically-motivated performance metrics, including new distribution-based interventional metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T13:04:07Z)
• Active Learning for Optimal Intervention Design in Causal Models [11.294389953686945]
  We develop a causal active learning strategy to identify interventions that are optimal, as measured by the discrepancy between the post-interventional mean of the distribution and a desired target mean. We apply our approach to both synthetic data and single-cell transcriptomic data from Perturb-CITE-seq experiments to identify optimal perturbations that induce a specific cell state transition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-10T20:40:30Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Learning Neural Causal Models with Active Interventions [83.44636110899742]
  We introduce an active intervention-targeting mechanism which enables a quick identification of the underlying causal structure of the data-generating process. Our method significantly reduces the required number of interactions compared with random intervention targeting. We demonstrate superior performance on multiple benchmarks from simulated to real-world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T13:10:37Z)
• Estimating the Effects of Continuous-valued Interventions using Generative Adversarial Networks [103.14809802212535]
  We build on the generative adversarial networks (GANs) framework to address the problem of estimating the effect of continuous-valued interventions. Our model, SCIGAN, is flexible and capable of simultaneously estimating counterfactual outcomes for several different continuous interventions. To address the challenges presented by shifting to continuous interventions, we propose a novel architecture for our discriminator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T18:46:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.