Exploring The Spatial Reasoning Ability of Neural Models in Human IQ Tests

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.05352v1
• Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:41:46 GMT
• Title: Exploring The Spatial Reasoning Ability of Neural Models in Human IQ Tests
• Authors: Hyunjae Kim, Yookyung Koh, Jinheon Baek, Jaewoo Kang
• Abstract summary: We focus on spatial reasoning and explore the spatial understanding of neural models. We constructed datasets that consist of various complexity levels. We provide an analysis of the results and factors that affect the generalization abilities of models.
• Score: 19.338539583910023
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Although neural models have performed impressively well on various tasks such as image recognition and question answering, their reasoning ability has been measured in only few studies. In this work, we focus on spatial reasoning and explore the spatial understanding of neural models. First, we describe the following two spatial reasoning IQ tests: rotation and shape composition. Using well-defined rules, we constructed datasets that consist of various complexity levels. We designed a variety of experiments in terms of generalization, and evaluated six different baseline models on the newly generated datasets. We provide an analysis of the results and factors that affect the generalization abilities of models. Also, we analyze how neural models solve spatial reasoning tests with visual aids. Our findings would provide valuable insights into understanding a machine and the difference between a machine and human.

Related papers

• Don't Cut Corners: Exact Conditions for Modularity in Biologically Inspired Representations [52.48094670415497]
  We develop a theory of when biologically inspired representations modularise with respect to source variables (sources) We derive necessary and sufficient conditions on a sample of sources that determine whether the neurons in an optimal biologically-inspired linear autoencoder modularise. Our theory applies to any dataset, extending far beyond the case of statistical independence studied in previous work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:41:37Z)
• The Topology and Geometry of Neural Representations [13.050815711184821]
  A central question for neuroscience is how to characterize brain representations of perceptual and cognitive content. Previous studies have characterized brain representations by their representational geometry. We propose topological representational similarity analysis (tRSA), an extension of representational similarity analysis (RSA) We evaluate this new family of statistics in terms of the sensitivity and specificity for model selection using both simulations and fMRI data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T03:15:11Z)
• Evaluating alignment between humans and neural network representations in image-based learning tasks [5.657101730705275]
  We tested how well the representations of $86$ pretrained neural network models mapped to human learning trajectories. We found that while training dataset size was a core determinant of alignment with human choices, contrastive training with multi-modal data (text and imagery) was a common feature of currently publicly available models that predicted human generalisation. In conclusion, pretrained neural networks can serve to extract representations for cognitive models, as they appear to capture some fundamental aspects of cognition that are transferable across tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T08:18:29Z)
• Spatiotemporal Patterns in Neurobiology: An Overview for Future Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  We argue that computational models are key tools for elucidating possible functionalities that emerge from network interactions. Here we review several classes of models including spiking neurons, integrate and fire neurons. We hope these studies will inform future developments in artificial intelligence algorithms as well as help validate our understanding of brain processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T10:28:01Z)
• Feature visualization for convolutional neural network models trained on neuroimaging data [0.0]
  We show for the first time results using feature visualization of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) We have trained CNNs for different tasks including sex classification and artificial lesion classification based on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. The resulting images reveal the learned concepts of the artificial lesions, including their shapes, but remain hard to interpret for abstract features in the sex classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-24T15:24:38Z)
• EINNs: Epidemiologically-Informed Neural Networks [75.34199997857341]
  We introduce a new class of physics-informed neural networks-EINN-crafted for epidemic forecasting. We investigate how to leverage both the theoretical flexibility provided by mechanistic models as well as the data-driven expressability afforded by AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T18:59:03Z)
• The Causal Neural Connection: Expressiveness, Learnability, and Inference [125.57815987218756]
  An object called structural causal model (SCM) represents a collection of mechanisms and sources of random variation of the system under investigation. In this paper, we show that the causal hierarchy theorem (Thm. 1, Bareinboim et al., 2020) still holds for neural models. We introduce a special type of SCM called a neural causal model (NCM), and formalize a new type of inductive bias to encode structural constraints necessary for performing causal inferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T01:55:18Z)
• The Neural Coding Framework for Learning Generative Models [91.0357317238509]
  We propose a novel neural generative model inspired by the theory of predictive processing in the brain. In a similar way, artificial neurons in our generative model predict what neighboring neurons will do, and adjust their parameters based on how well the predictions matched reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T01:20:38Z)
• Learning identifiable and interpretable latent models of high-dimensional neural activity using pi-VAE [10.529943544385585]
  We propose a method that integrates key ingredients from latent models and traditional neural encoding models. Our method, pi-VAE, is inspired by recent progress on identifiable variational auto-encoder. We validate pi-VAE using synthetic data, and apply it to analyze neurophysiological datasets from rat hippocampus and macaque motor cortex.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T22:00:38Z)
• Compositional Explanations of Neurons [52.71742655312625]
  We describe a procedure for explaining neurons in deep representations by identifying compositional logical concepts. We use this procedure to answer several questions on interpretability in models for vision and natural language processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T20:37:05Z)
• Rethinking Generalization of Neural Models: A Named Entity Recognition Case Study [81.11161697133095]
  We take the NER task as a testbed to analyze the generalization behavior of existing models from different perspectives. Experiments with in-depth analyses diagnose the bottleneck of existing neural NER models. As a by-product of this paper, we have open-sourced a project that involves a comprehensive summary of recent NER papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-12T04:33:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.