A Taxonomy and Review of Algorithms for Modeling and Predicting Human
Driver Behavior
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08832v3
- Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 03:40:24 GMT
- Title: A Taxonomy and Review of Algorithms for Modeling and Predicting Human
Driver Behavior
- Authors: Kyle Brown and Katherine Driggs-Campbell and Mykel J. Kochenderfer
- Abstract summary: We present a review and taxonomy of 200 models from the literature on driver behavior modeling.
We begin by introducing a mathematical framework for describing the dynamics of interactive multi-agent traffic.
Our taxonomy is constructed around the core modeling tasks of state estimation, intention estimation, trait estimation, and motion prediction.
- Score: 36.80532606715206
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We present a review and taxonomy of 200 models from the literature on driver
behavior modeling. We begin by introducing a mathematical framework for
describing the dynamics of interactive multi-agent traffic. Based on the
partially observable stochastic game, this framework provides a basis for
discussing different driver modeling techniques. Our taxonomy is constructed
around the core modeling tasks of state estimation, intention estimation, trait
estimation, and motion prediction, and also discusses the auxiliary tasks of
risk estimation, anomaly detection, behavior imitation and microscopic traffic
simulation. Existing driver models are categorized based on the specific tasks
they address and key attributes of their approach.
Related papers
- Trajeglish: Traffic Modeling as Next-Token Prediction [67.28197954427638]
A longstanding challenge for self-driving development is simulating dynamic driving scenarios seeded from recorded driving logs.
We apply tools from discrete sequence modeling to model how vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists interact in driving scenarios.
Our model tops the Sim Agents Benchmark, surpassing prior work along the realism meta metric by 3.3% and along the interaction metric by 9.9%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T18:53:27Z) - Smooth-Trajectron++: Augmenting the Trajectron++ behaviour prediction
model with smooth attention [0.0]
This work investigates the state-of-the-art trajectory forecasting model Trajectron++ which we enhance by incorporating a smoothing term in its attention module.
This attention mechanism mimics human attention inspired by cognitive science research indicating limits to attention switching.
We evaluate the performance of the resulting Smooth-Trajectron++ model and compare it to the original model on various benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T09:19:55Z) - Car-Following Models: A Multidisciplinary Review [35.57095196826516]
Car-following models encompass multiple disciplines, including traffic engineering, physics, dynamic system control, cognitive science, machine learning, and reinforcement learning.
It reviews representative algorithms, ranging from theory-based kinematic models, Psycho-Physical Models, and Adaptive cruise control models to data-driven algorithms like Reinforcement Learning (RL) and Imitation Learning (IL)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-14T14:06:33Z) - Are Neural Topic Models Broken? [81.15470302729638]
We study the relationship between automated and human evaluation of topic models.
We find that neural topic models fare worse in both respects compared to an established classical method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-28T14:38:50Z) - IDM-Follower: A Model-Informed Deep Learning Method for Long-Sequence
Car-Following Trajectory Prediction [24.94160059351764]
Most car-following models are generative and only consider the inputs of the speed, position, and acceleration of the last time step.
We implement a novel structure with two independent encoders and a self-attention decoder that could sequentially predict the following trajectories.
Numerical experiments with multiple settings on simulation and NGSIM datasets show that the IDM-Follower can improve the prediction performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-20T02:24:27Z) - Learning Dynamics Models for Model Predictive Agents [28.063080817465934]
Model-Based Reinforcement Learning involves learning a textitdynamics model from data, and then using this model to optimise behaviour.
This paper sets out to disambiguate the role of different design choices for learning dynamics models, by comparing their performance to planning with a ground-truth model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-29T09:50:25Z) - Bidirectional Interaction between Visual and Motor Generative Models
using Predictive Coding and Active Inference [68.8204255655161]
We propose a neural architecture comprising a generative model for sensory prediction, and a distinct generative model for motor trajectories.
We highlight how sequences of sensory predictions can act as rails guiding learning, control and online adaptation of motor trajectories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-19T09:41:31Z) - Forethought and Hindsight in Credit Assignment [62.05690959741223]
We work to understand the gains and peculiarities of planning employed as forethought via forward models or as hindsight operating with backward models.
We investigate the best use of models in planning, primarily focusing on the selection of states in which predictions should be (re)-evaluated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-26T16:00:47Z) - Goal-Aware Prediction: Learning to Model What Matters [105.43098326577434]
One of the fundamental challenges in using a learned forward dynamics model is the mismatch between the objective of the learned model and that of the downstream planner or policy.
We propose to direct prediction towards task relevant information, enabling the model to be aware of the current task and encouraging it to only model relevant quantities of the state space.
We find that our method more effectively models the relevant parts of the scene conditioned on the goal, and as a result outperforms standard task-agnostic dynamics models and model-free reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-14T16:42:59Z) - A Meta-Bayesian Model of Intentional Visual Search [0.0]
We propose a computational model of visual search that incorporates Bayesian interpretations of the neural mechanisms that underlie categorical perception and saccade planning.
To enable meaningful comparisons between simulated and human behaviours, we employ a gaze-contingent paradigm that required participants to classify occluded MNIST digits through a window that followed their gaze.
Our model is able to recapitulate human behavioural metrics such as classification accuracy while retaining a high degree of interpretability, which we demonstrate by recovering subject-specific parameters from observed human behaviour.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-05T16:10:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.