Mitigating measurement errors in multi-qubit experiments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.14044v2
• Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 23:36:10 GMT
• Title: Mitigating measurement errors in multi-qubit experiments
• Authors: Sergey Bravyi, Sarah Sheldon, Abhinav Kandala, David C. Mckay, and Jay M. Gambetta
• Abstract summary: We show how to mitigate measurement errors by a classical post-processing of the measured outcomes. Two error mitigation schemes are presented based on tensor product and correlated Markovian noise models.
• Score: 2.7015517125109247
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reducing measurement errors in multi-qubit quantum devices is critical for performing any quantum algorithm. Here we show how to mitigate measurement errors by a classical post-processing of the measured outcomes. Our techniques apply to any experiment where measurement outcomes are used for computing expected values of observables. Two error mitigation schemes are presented based on tensor product and correlated Markovian noise models. Error rates parameterizing these noise models can be extracted from the measurement calibration data using a simple formula. Error mitigation is achieved by applying the inverse noise matrix to a probability vector that represents the outcomes of a noisy measurement. The error mitigation overhead, including the the number of measurements and the cost of the classical post-processing, is exponential in $\epsilon n$, where $\epsilon$ is the maximum error rate and $n$ is the number of qubits. We report experimental demonstration of our error mitigation methods on IBM Quantum devices using stabilizer measurements for graph states with $n\le 12$ qubits and entangled 20-qubit states generated by low-depth random Clifford circuits.

Related papers

• Real-time measurement error mitigation for one-way quantum computation [0.0]
  We propose a quantum error mitigation scheme for single-qubit measurement errors, particularly suited for one-way quantum computation. Our method is capable of mitigating measurement errors in real-time, during the processing measurements of the one-way computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T23:27:47Z)
• Model-based Optimization of Superconducting Qubit Readout [59.992881941624965]
  We demonstrate model-based readout optimization for superconducting qubits. We observe 1.5% error per qubit with a 500ns end-to-end duration and minimal excess reset error from residual resonator photons. This technique can scale to hundreds of qubits and be used to enhance the performance of error-correcting codes and near-term applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T23:30:56Z)
• Calibration of Syndrome Measurements in a Single Experiment [0.0]
  Methods of quantum error correction are starting to be beneficial on current quantum computing hardware. We present a calibration method which allows to take the additional noise into account. We give examples of how to apply this method to noise estimation and error correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T17:21:18Z)
• Volumetric Benchmarking of Error Mitigation with Qermit [0.0]
  We develop a methodology to assess the performance of quantum error mitigation techniques. Our benchmarks are volumetric in design, and are performed on different superconducting hardware devices. Qermit is an open source python package for quantum error mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-20T18:13:04Z)
• The Accuracy vs. Sampling Overhead Trade-off in Quantum Error Mitigation Using Monte Carlo-Based Channel Inversion [84.66087478797475]
  Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is a class of promising techniques for reducing the computational error of variational quantum algorithms. We consider a practical channel inversion strategy based on Monte Carlo sampling, which introduces additional computational error. We show that when the computational error is small compared to the dynamic range of the error-free results, it scales with the square root of the number of gates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-20T00:05:01Z)
• Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
  We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application. We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor. This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z)
• Performance of teleportation-based error correction circuits for bosonic codes with noisy measurements [58.720142291102135]
  We analyze the error-correction capabilities of rotation-symmetric codes using a teleportation-based error-correction circuit. We find that with the currently achievable measurement efficiencies in microwave optics, bosonic rotation codes undergo a substantial decrease in their break-even potential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-02T16:12:13Z)
• Exponential suppression of bit or phase flip errors with repetitive error correction [56.362599585843085]
  State-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near $10-3$. Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits. We implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T17:11:20Z)
• Measurement Error Mitigation in Quantum Computers Through Classical Bit-Flip Correction [1.6872254218310017]
  We develop a classical bit-flip correction method to mitigate measurement errors on quantum computers. This method can be applied to any operator, any number of qubits, and any realistic bit-flip probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T17:52:12Z)
• Scalable quantum processor noise characterization [57.57666052437813]
  We present a scalable way to construct approximate MFMs for many-qubit devices based on cumulant expansion. Our method can also be used to characterize various types of correlation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T17:39:42Z)
• Rigorous measurement error correction [0.0]
  We review an experimental technique used to correct state preparation and measurement errors on gate-based quantum computers. We show how to obtain $Gamma$ from gate set tomography and apply the error correction technique to single IBM Q superconducting qubits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-04T18:58:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.