Enterprise Architecture in Healthcare Systems: A systematic literature review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.06767v2
• Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:18:38 GMT
• Title: Enterprise Architecture in Healthcare Systems: A systematic literature review
• Authors: Silvano Herculano da Luz J\'unior, Francisco \'Icaro Cipriano Silva, Gustavo Sousa Galisa Albuquerque, Francisco Petr\^onio Alencar de Medeiros and Heremita Brasileiro Lira
• Abstract summary: Enterprise architecture (EA) has been present in scientific literature since the 1980s. EA delivers value by presenting business and ICT leaders with recommendations for adjusting policies and projects to achieve business goals. This work presents a systematic literature review to select studies demonstrating current EA practices in healthcare systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Enterprise architecture (EA) has been present in scientific literature since the 1980s and has branched out into several research fields. EA delivers value by presenting business and ICT leaders with recommendations for adjusting policies and projects to achieve business goals. Although there are many works on the EA application in healthcare systems, the literature lacks studies that provide a systematic approach to this topic specifically. This work presents a deep and broad Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to select studies demonstrating current EA practices in healthcare systems. The researchers established an SLR protocol returning 280 primary studies after the first step of the Data Selection and a consolidated inclusion of 46 articles after the second step. They assessed the level of disagreement during the team's evaluations using Cohen's Kappa. This SLR revealed essential aspects of state-of-the-art EA application in healthcare systems, such as the most used methodologies and tools, best practices, and criteria considered for their choice. It also analyzed the main positive impacts, challenges, and critical success factors described by the studies' authors based on empirical approaches. Besides, this work brings the main publication channels and the most influential authors on the topic of EA in Healthcare systems.

Related papers

• SurveyAgent: A Conversational System for Personalized and Efficient Research Survey [50.04283471107001]
  This paper introduces SurveyAgent, a novel conversational system designed to provide personalized and efficient research survey assistance to researchers. SurveyAgent integrates three key modules: Knowledge Management for organizing papers, Recommendation for discovering relevant literature, and Query Answering for engaging with content on a deeper level. Our evaluation demonstrates SurveyAgent's effectiveness in streamlining research activities, showcasing its capability to facilitate how researchers interact with scientific literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T15:01:51Z)
• A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [58.6354685593418]
  This paper proposes several article-level, field-normalized, and large language model-empowered bibliometric indicators to evaluate reviews. The newly emerging AI-generated literature reviews are also appraised. This work offers insights into the current challenges of literature reviews and envisions future directions for their development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z)
• Privacy Impact Assessments in the Wild: A Scoping Review [1.7677916783208343]
  Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) offer a systematic process for assessing the privacy impacts of a project or system. PIAs are heralded as one of the main approaches to privacy by design, supporting the early identification of threats and controls. There is still a significant need for more primary research on the topic, both qualitative and quantitative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T05:07:10Z)
• Question answering systems for health professionals at the point of care -- a systematic review [2.446313557261822]
  Question answering (QA) systems have the potential to improve the quality of clinical care by providing health professionals with the latest and most relevant evidence. This systematic review aims to characterize current medical QA systems, assess their suitability for healthcare, and identify areas of improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T13:47:39Z)
• De-identification of clinical free text using natural language processing: A systematic review of current approaches [48.343430343213896]
  Natural language processing has repeatedly demonstrated its feasibility in automating the de-identification process. Our study aims to provide systematic evidence on how the de-identification of clinical free text has evolved in the last thirteen years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T13:20:41Z)
• Healthcare Knowledge Graph Construction: State-of-the-art, open issues, and opportunities [5.652978777706895]
  This paper is the first to provide a comprehensive taxonomy and a bird's eye view of healthcare KG construction. A thorough examination of the current state-of-the-art techniques drawn from academic works relevant to various healthcare contexts is carried out. Several research findings and existing issues in the literature are reported and discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-08T09:19:01Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)
• Benefits, Challenges and Contributors to Success for National eHealth Systems Implementation: A Scoping Review [3.441021278275805]
  Key factors influencing success include promoting trust of the system, ensuring wider acceptance amongst users, reconciling the system with legal requirements and ensuring an adaptable technical platform. This study identifies the primary socio-technical, legal and ethical factors that challenge and contribute to the success of eHealth system implementations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T12:25:54Z)
• An Analysis of a BERT Deep Learning Strategy on a Technology Assisted Review Task [91.3755431537592]
  Document screening is a central task within Evidenced Based Medicine. I propose a DL document classification approach with BERT or PubMedBERT embeddings and a DL similarity search path. I test and evaluate the retrieval effectiveness of my DL strategy on the 2017 and 2018 CLEF eHealth collections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T19:45:27Z)
• Digital personal health libraries: a systematic literature review [15.392783869176778]
  This paper gives context on recent literature regarding the development of digital personal health libraries (PHL) It provides insights into the potential application of consumer health informatics in diverse clinical specialties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T01:11:38Z)
• Opportunities and Challenges of Deep Learning Methods for Electrocardiogram Data: A Systematic Review [62.490310870300746]
  The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most commonly used diagnostic tools in medicine and healthcare. Deep learning methods have achieved promising results on predictive healthcare tasks using ECG signals. This paper presents a systematic review of deep learning methods for ECG data from both modeling and application perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-28T02:44:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.