Benefits, Challenges and Contributors to Success for National eHealth Systems Implementation: A Scoping Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.08737v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:25:54 GMT
• Title: Benefits, Challenges and Contributors to Success for National eHealth Systems Implementation: A Scoping Review
• Authors: James Scheibner, Marcello Ienca, Joanna Sleigh and Effy Vayena
• Abstract summary: Key factors influencing success include promoting trust of the system, ensuring wider acceptance amongst users, reconciling the system with legal requirements and ensuring an adaptable technical platform. This study identifies the primary socio-technical, legal and ethical factors that challenge and contribute to the success of eHealth system implementations.
• Score: 3.441021278275805
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Our scoping review aims to assess what legal, ethical, and socio-technical factors contribute or inhibit the success of national eHealth system implementations. In addition, our review seeks to describe the characteristics and benefits of eHealth systems. We conducted a scoping review of literature published in English between January 2000 and 2020 using a keyword search on five databases; PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEEXplore, and ProQuest. After removal of duplicates, abstract screening and full-text filtering, 86 articles were included from 8276 search results. We identified 17 stakeholder groups, 6 eHealth Systems areas, and 15 types of legal regimes and standards. In-depth textual analysis revealed challenges mainly in implementation, followed by ethico-legal and data related aspects. Key factors influencing success include promoting trust of the system, ensuring wider acceptance amongst users, reconciling the system with legal requirements and ensuring an adaptable technical platform. Results revealed support for decentralised implementations because they carry less implementation and engagement challenges than centralised ones. Simultaneously, due to decentralised systems interoperability issues, federated implementations (with a set of national standards) might be preferable. This study identifies the primary socio-technical, legal and ethical factors that challenge and contribute to the success of eHealth system implementations. This study also describes the complexities and characteristics of existing eHealth implementation programs, and surmises suggested guidance for resolving the identified challenges.

Related papers

• Implementing a Nordic-Baltic Federated Health Data Network: a case report [56.96209893909196]
  We formed an interdisciplinary consortium to develop a feder-ated health data network, comprised of six institutions across five countries. The objective of this report is to offer early insights into our experiences developing this network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T14:15:54Z)
• Analysis of Blockchain Integration in the e-Healthcare Ecosystem [0.0]
  This article studies the most commonly adopted approaches in healthcare data management systems using blockchain technology. An evaluation is conducted based on a set of observed common characteristics, distinguishing one approach from the others. For effective implementation in the context of e-health, we emphasize the existence of crucial challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-08T12:19:53Z)
• Large Language Models in Mental Health Care: a Scoping Review [28.635427491110484]
  The integration of large language models (LLMs) in mental health care is an emerging field. There is a need to systematically review the application outcomes and delineate the advantages and limitations in clinical settings. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of LLMs in mental health care, assessing their efficacy, challenges, and potential for future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T17:35:52Z)
• De-identification of clinical free text using natural language processing: A systematic review of current approaches [48.343430343213896]
  Natural language processing has repeatedly demonstrated its feasibility in automating the de-identification process. Our study aims to provide systematic evidence on how the de-identification of clinical free text has evolved in the last thirteen years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T13:20:41Z)
• Designing Interpretable ML System to Enhance Trust in Healthcare: A Systematic Review to Proposed Responsible Clinician-AI-Collaboration Framework [13.215318138576713]
  The paper reviews interpretable AI processes, methods, applications, and the challenges of implementation in healthcare. It aims to foster a comprehensive understanding of the crucial role of a robust interpretability approach in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T12:29:18Z)
• The Design and Implementation of a National AI Platform for Public Healthcare in Italy: Implications for Semantics and Interoperability [62.997667081978825]
  The Italian National Health Service is adopting Artificial Intelligence through its technical agencies. Such a vast programme requires special care in formalising the knowledge domain. Questions have been raised about the impact that AI could have on patients, practitioners, and health systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T08:00:02Z)
• Smart Healthcare System Implementation Challenges: A stakeholder perspective [0.38073142980733]
  The objective of this study is to identify the key challenges associated with each stakeholder of the smart healthcare system. We have identified 27 challenges associated with eight key stakeholders of smart healthcare reported in the state-of-the-art literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-24T09:50:36Z)
• Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Review [90.22219142430146]
  We analyze the intersection of fairness in machine learning and healthcare disparities. We provide a critical review of the associated fairness metrics from a machine learning standpoint. We propose several new research directions that hold promise for developing ethical and equitable ML applications in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-29T04:32:10Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)
• Towards a framework for evaluating the safety, acceptability and efficacy of AI systems for health: an initial synthesis [0.2936007114555107]
  We aim to set out a minimally viable framework for evaluating the safety, acceptability and efficacy of AI systems for healthcare. We do this by conducting a systematic search across Scopus, PubMed and Google Scholar. The result is a framework to guide AI system developers, policymakers, and regulators through a sufficient evaluation of an AI system designed for use in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T15:00:39Z)
• Assessing the Severity of Health States based on Social Media Posts [62.52087340582502]
  We propose a multiview learning framework that models both the textual content as well as contextual-information to assess the severity of the user's health state. The diverse NLU views demonstrate its effectiveness on both the tasks and as well as on the individual disease to assess a user's health.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-21T03:45:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.