The Concept 'Indistinguishable'

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.14214v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:42:43 GMT
• Title: The Concept 'Indistinguishable'
• Authors: Simon Saunders
• Abstract summary: All ordinary matter is made of electrons, protons, neutrons, and photons and they are all indistinguishable particles. The concept of indistinguishable particles has proved elusive, in part because of the interpretational difficulties that afflict quantum theory. I offer a deflationary reading of the concept "indistinguishable" that is identical to the Gibbs concept of "generic phase"
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The concept of indistinguishable particles in quantum theory is fundamental to questions of ontology. All ordinary matter is made of electrons, protons, neutrons, and photons and they are all indistinguishable particles. Yet the concept itself has proved elusive, in part because of the interpretational difficulties that afflict quantum theory quite generally, and in part because the concept was so central to the discovery of the quantum itself, by Planck in 1900; it came encumbered with revolution. I offer a deflationary reading of the concept "indistinguishable" that is identical to the Gibbs concept of "generic phase", save that it is defined for state spaces with only finitely-many states of bounded volume and energy (finitely-many orthogonal states, in quantum mechanics). That, and that alone, makes for the difference between the quantum and Gibbs concepts of indistinguishability. This claim is heretical on several counts, but here we consider only the content of the claim itself, and its bearing on the early history of quantum theory rather than in relation to contemporary debates about particle indistinguishability and permutation symmetry. It powerfully illuminates that history.

Related papers

• Which features of quantum physics are not fundamentally quantum but are due to indeterminism? [0.0]
  We argue that most of the features, problems, and paradoxes attributed to quantum physics have a clear classical analogue. What really characterizes quantum physics boils down only to phenomena that involve $hbar$, i.e., incompatible observables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T18:00:01Z)
• Locality in the Schroedinger Picture of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We explain how the so-called Einstein locality is to be understood in the Schr"odinger picture of quantum mechanics. Contrary to some beliefs that quantum mechanics is incomplete, it is, in fact, its overcompleteness as exemplified by different pictures of quantum physics, that points to the same underlying reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T21:16:39Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Demystifying Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We discuss the concepts of physical reality imposed by quantum mechanics, the role of the observer, prediction limits, a definition of collapse, and how to deal with correlated states. The discussion is carried out within the framework of accepting that there is in fact nothing important missing, rather we are just restricted by the limitations imposed by quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T22:32:11Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• On quantum neural networks [91.3755431537592]
  We argue that the concept of a quantum neural network should be defined in terms of its most general function. Our reasoning is based on the use of the Feynman path integral formulation in quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T18:30:30Z)
• The Time-Evolution of States in Quantum Mechanics [77.34726150561087]
  It is argued that the Schr"odinger equation does not yield a correct description of the quantum-mechanical time evolution of states of isolated (open) systems featuring events. A precise general law for the time evolution of states replacing the Schr"odinger equation is formulated within the so-called ETH-Approach to Quantum Mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-04T16:09:10Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)
• Is the standard quantum mechanics a completely nondeterministic theory? [0.0]
  It is argued that although quantum theory isn't an absolutely deterministic theory, it is partially deterministic. The argument is based on the conceptual meaning of determinism and by means of some well-known phenomena in the quantum world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-04T14:48:13Z)
• Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
  We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology. These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z)
• Quantum resource covariance [0.0]
  Since the dawn of quantum mechanics there is no consensus on what the theory is all about. We construct a theoretical framework within which a given combination of quantum resources is shown to be a Galilean invariant. We show that the notion of physical reality implied by quantum mechanics is not absolute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-19T17:34:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.