Tactics for Internal Compliance: A Literature Review
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.03775v1
- Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 17:56:17 GMT
- Title: Tactics for Internal Compliance: A Literature Review
- Authors: Ralph Foorthuis
- Abstract summary: We present a typology of 45 compliance tactics, which constitutes a comprehensive and rich overview of elementary ways for bringing the organization into compliance.
Secondly, we provide an overview of fundamental concepts in the theory of compliance, which forms the basis for the framework we developed for positioning compliance tactics.
Thirdly, we present insights for moving from compliance tactics to compliance strategies.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Compliance of organizations with internal and external norms is a highly
relevant topic for both practitioners and academics nowadays. However, the
substantive, elementary compliance tactics that organizations can use for
achieving internal compliance have been described in a fragmented manner and in
the literatures of distinct academic disciplines. Using a multidisciplinary
structured literature review of 134 publications, this study offers three
contributions. First, we present a typology of 45 compliance tactics, which
constitutes a comprehensive and rich overview of elementary ways for bringing
the organization into compliance. Secondly, we provide an overview of
fundamental concepts in the theory of compliance, which forms the basis for the
framework we developed for positioning compliance tactics and for analyzing or
developing compliance strategies. Thirdly, we present insights for moving from
compliance tactics to compliance strategies. In the process, and using the
multidisciplinary literature review to take a bird's-eye view, we demonstrate
that compliance strategies need to be regarded as a richer concept than
perceived hitherto. We also show that opportunities for innovation exist.
Related papers
- Three Decades of Formal Methods in Business Process Compliance: A Systematic Literature Review [0.0]
Digitalization efforts often face a key challenge: business processes must adhere to legal regulations.
This study focuses on rigorous frameworks using formal methods to verify or ensure compliance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-13T21:19:57Z) - Normative Requirements Operationalization with Large Language Models [3.456725053685842]
Normative non-functional requirements specify constraints that a system must observe in order to avoid violations of social, legal, ethical, empathetic, and cultural norms.
Recent research has tackled this challenge using a domain-specific language to specify normative requirements.
We propose a complementary approach that uses Large Language Models to extract semantic relationships between abstract representations of system capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-18T17:01:34Z) - The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the
Current State of Practice [64.29355073494125]
This article aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation.
We articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T05:30:42Z) - Approaching Unanticipated Consequences [3.253495920474109]
We explored how software that fulfils its requirements may have un-envisioned aftereffects with significant impacts.
We considered three real-world case studies and engaged with literature from several disciplines to develop a conceptual framework.
We found participant groups navigated the model with either a convergent or divergent intent.
The study demonstrated potential for the conceptual framework to be used as a tool with implications for research and practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-16T16:43:52Z) - Automating the Analysis of Institutional Design in International
Agreements [52.77024349608834]
The developed tool utilizes techniques such as collecting legal documents, annotating them with Institutional Grammar, and using graph analysis to explore the formal institutional design.
The system was tested against the 2003 UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T08:57:11Z) - A multidomain relational framework to guide institutional AI research
and adoption [0.0]
We argue that research efforts aimed at understanding the implications of adopting AI tend to prioritize only a handful of ideas.
We propose a simple policy and research design tool in the form of a conceptual framework to organize terms across fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-17T16:33:01Z) - Tackling problems, harvesting benefits -- A systematic review of the
regulatory debate around AI [0.0]
How to integrate an emerging and all-pervasive technology such as AI into the structures and operations of our society is a question of contemporary politics, science and public debate.
This article analyzes the academic debate around the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI)
The analysis concentrates on societal risks and harms, questions of regulatory responsibility, and possible adequate policy frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-07T11:29:30Z) - Entity Graph Extraction from Legal Acts -- a Prototype for a Use Case in
Policy Design Analysis [52.77024349608834]
This paper presents a prototype developed to serve the quantitative study of public policy design.
Our system aims to automate the process of gathering legal documents, annotating them with Institutional Grammar, and using hypergraphs to analyse inter-relations between crucial entities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-02T10:57:47Z) - Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for
algorithmic systems [76.79703106646967]
We develop a value-based assessment framework that visualizes closeness and tensions between values.
We give guidelines on how to operationalize them, while opening up the evaluation and deliberation process to a wide range of stakeholders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-09T19:28:32Z) - Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration
in Peer Review [52.359007622096684]
Peer review is a key component of the publishing process in most fields of science.
Existing NLP studies focus on the analysis of individual texts.
editorial assistance often requires modeling interactions between pairs of texts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-22T16:39:38Z) - Case Study: Deontological Ethics in NLP [119.53038547411062]
We study one ethical theory, namely deontological ethics, from the perspective of NLP.
In particular, we focus on the generalization principle and the respect for autonomy through informed consent.
We provide four case studies to demonstrate how these principles can be used with NLP systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-09T16:04:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.