Relational Quantum Entanglement Beyond Non-Separable and Contextual Relativism

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.06743v1
• Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 15:51:37 GMT
• Title: Relational Quantum Entanglement Beyond Non-Separable and Contextual Relativism
• Authors: Christian de Ronde, C\'esar Massri
• Abstract summary: We address the relativist-perspectival nature of the orthodox definition of quantum entanglement in terms of preferred factorizations. We show how a new objective definition of entanglement is able to escape both non-separable relativism and contextual relativism.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper we address the relativist-perspectival nature of the orthodox definition of quantum entanglement in terms of preferred factorizations. We also consider this aspect aspect within the generalized definition of entanglement proposed by Barnum et al. [6, 7] in terms of preferred observables. More specifically, we will discuss the non-separable relativism implied by the orthodox definition of entanglement, the contextual relativism implied by its generalization as well as some other serious problems presently discussed within the specialized literature. In the second part of this work, we address a recently proposed objective-invariant definition of entanglement understood as the actual and potential coding of effective and intensive relations [32]. Through the derivation of two theorems we will show explicitly how this new objective definition of entanglement is able to escape both non-separable relativism and contextual relativism. According to these theorems, within this proposed relational definition, all possible subsets of observables as well as all possible factorizations can be globally considered as making reference to the same (potential) state of affairs. The conclusion is that, unlike with the orthodox definitions, this new objective-relational notion of entanglement is able to bypass relativism right from the start opening the door to a realist understanding of quantum correlations.

Related papers

• Equivalence Relations in Quantum Theory: An Objective Account of Bases and Factorizations [0.0]
  In orthodox Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM) bases and factorizations are considered to define quantum states and entanglement in relativistic terms. We provide an invariant account of bases and factorizations which allows us to build a conceptual-operational bridge between formalism and quantum phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T10:17:49Z)
• Relational Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Relativism, and the Iteration of Relativity [0.0]
  The idea that the dynamical properties of quantum systems are invariably relative to other systems has recently regained currency. Are there absolute facts about the properties one system possesses relative to a specified reference, or is this again a relative matter, and so on? I conclude with some reflections on the current state of play in perspectivist versions of RQM and quantum relativism more generally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T21:48:41Z)
• A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
  We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality. Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z)
• What is nonclassical about uncertainty relations? [0.0]
  Uncertainty relations express limits on the extent to which the outcomes of distinct measurements on a single state can be made jointly predictable. We show that for a class of theories satisfying a particular symmetry property, the functional form of this predictability tradeoff is constrained by noncontextuality to be below a linear curve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-24T17:19:47Z)
• Genuine multipartite entanglement and quantum coherence in an electron-positron system: Relativistic covariance [117.44028458220427]
  We analyze the behavior of both genuine multipartite entanglement and quantum coherence under Lorentz boosts. A given combination of these quantum resources is shown to form a Lorentz invariant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-26T17:22:59Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Relativistic spin operator must be intrinsic [0.0]
  There is no consensus concerning the set of properties that a relativistic spin observable should satisfy. We present how to overcome this problem by imposing a condition that everyone should agree about the nature of the relativistic spin observable: it must be intrinsic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T03:39:10Z)
• Equivalence of approaches to relational quantum dynamics in relativistic settings [68.8204255655161]
  We show that the trinity' of relational quantum dynamics holds in relativistic settings per frequency superselection sector. We ascribe the time according to the clock subsystem to a POVM which is covariant with respect to its (quadratic) Hamiltonian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T16:12:24Z)
• Relational observables, reference frames, and conditional probabilities [0.0]
  We show how conditional expectation values of worldline tensor fields are related to quantum averages of suitably defined relational observables. We analyze a recollapsing cosmological model, for which we construct unitarily evolving quantum relational observables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-09T21:54:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.