KrigHedge: Gaussian Process Surrogates for Delta Hedging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08407v4
• Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 05:14:22 GMT
• Title: KrigHedge: Gaussian Process Surrogates for Delta Hedging
• Authors: Mike Ludkovski and Yuri Saporito
• Abstract summary: We investigate a machine learning approach to option Greeks approximation based on Gaussian process (GP) surrogates. We provide a detailed analysis of numerous aspects of GP surrogates, including choice of kernel family, simulation design, choice of trend function and impact of noise. We discuss the application to Delta hedging, including a new Lemma that relates quality of the Delta approximation to discrete-time hedging loss.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We investigate a machine learning approach to option Greeks approximation based on Gaussian process (GP) surrogates. The method takes in noisily observed option prices, fits a nonparametric input-output map and then analytically differentiates the latter to obtain the various price sensitivities. Our motivation is to compute Greeks in cases where direct computation is expensive, such as in local volatility models, or can only ever be done approximately. We provide a detailed analysis of numerous aspects of GP surrogates, including choice of kernel family, simulation design, choice of trend function and impact of noise. We further discuss the application to Delta hedging, including a new Lemma that relates quality of the Delta approximation to discrete-time hedging loss. Results are illustrated with two extensive case studies that consider estimation of Delta, Theta and Gamma and benchmark approximation quality and uncertainty quantification using a variety of statistical metrics. Among our key take-aways are the recommendation to use Matern kernels, the benefit of including virtual training points to capture boundary conditions, and the significant loss of fidelity when training on stock-path-based datasets.

Related papers

• Indiscriminate Disruption of Conditional Inference on Multivariate Gaussians [60.22542847840578]
  Despite advances in adversarial machine learning, inference for Gaussian models in the presence of an adversary is notably understudied. We consider a self-interested attacker who wishes to disrupt a decisionmaker's conditional inference and subsequent actions by corrupting a set of evidentiary variables. To avoid detection, the attacker also desires the attack to appear plausible wherein plausibility is determined by the density of the corrupted evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T17:46:55Z)
• Computation-Aware Gaussian Processes: Model Selection And Linear-Time Inference [55.150117654242706]
  We show that model selection for computation-aware GPs trained on 1.8 million data points can be done within a few hours on a single GPU. As a result of this work, Gaussian processes can be trained on large-scale datasets without significantly compromising their ability to quantify uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T21:11:48Z)
• Theoretical Convergence Guarantees for Variational Autoencoders [2.8167997311962942]
  Variational Autoencoders (VAE) are popular generative models used to sample from complex data distributions. This paper aims to bridge that gap by providing non-asymptotic convergence guarantees for VAE trained using both Gradient Descent and Adam algorithms. Our theoretical analysis applies to both Linear VAE and Deep Gaussian VAE, as well as several VAE variants, including $beta$-VAE and IWAE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T07:12:38Z)
• Variational Bayesian surrogate modelling with application to robust design optimisation [0.9626666671366836]
  Surrogate models provide a quick-to-evaluate approximation to complex computational models. We consider Bayesian inference for constructing statistical surrogates with input uncertainties and dimensionality reduction. We demonstrate intrinsic and robust structural optimisation problems where cost functions depend on a weighted sum of the mean and standard deviation of model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T09:22:35Z)
• Model-Based Epistemic Variance of Values for Risk-Aware Policy Optimization [59.758009422067]
  We consider the problem of quantifying uncertainty over expected cumulative rewards in model-based reinforcement learning. We propose a new uncertainty Bellman equation (UBE) whose solution converges to the true posterior variance over values. We introduce a general-purpose policy optimization algorithm, Q-Uncertainty Soft Actor-Critic (QU-SAC) that can be applied for either risk-seeking or risk-averse policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T15:55:58Z)
• Sensitivity-Aware Amortized Bayesian Inference [8.753065246797561]
  Sensitivity analyses reveal the influence of various modeling choices on the outcomes of statistical analyses. We propose sensitivity-aware amortized Bayesian inference (SA-ABI), a multifaceted approach to integrate sensitivity analyses into simulation-based inference with neural networks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in applied modeling problems, ranging from disease outbreak dynamics and global warming thresholds to human decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T10:14:10Z)
• Physics Inspired Approaches To Understanding Gaussian Processes [0.9712140341805067]
  We contribute an analysis of the loss landscape for GP models using methods from physics. We demonstrate $nu$-continuity for Matern kernels and outline aspects of catastrophe theory at critical points in the loss landscape. We also provide an a priori method for evaluating the effect of GP ensembles and discuss various voting approaches based on physical properties of the loss landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T06:39:07Z)
• Best-Effort Adaptation [62.00856290846247]
  We present a new theoretical analysis of sample reweighting methods, including bounds holding uniformly over the weights. We show how these bounds can guide the design of learning algorithms that we discuss in detail. We report the results of a series of experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of our best-effort adaptation and domain adaptation algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T00:09:07Z)
• Inverting brain grey matter models with likelihood-free inference: a tool for trustable cytoarchitecture measurements [62.997667081978825]
  characterisation of the brain grey matter cytoarchitecture with quantitative sensitivity to soma density and volume remains an unsolved challenge in dMRI. We propose a new forward model, specifically a new system of equations, requiring a few relatively sparse b-shells. We then apply modern tools from Bayesian analysis known as likelihood-free inference (LFI) to invert our proposed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T09:08:27Z)
• Evaluating Sensitivity to the Stick-Breaking Prior in Bayesian Nonparametrics [85.31247588089686]
  We show that variational Bayesian methods can yield sensitivities with respect to parametric and nonparametric aspects of Bayesian models. We provide both theoretical and empirical support for our variational approach to Bayesian sensitivity analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-08T03:40:18Z)
• Variable selection for Gaussian process regression through a sparse projection [0.802904964931021]
  This paper presents a new variable selection approach integrated with Gaussian process (GP) regression. The choice of tuning parameters and the accuracy of the estimation are evaluated with the simulation some chosen benchmark approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-25T01:06:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.